Valar Morghulis
Full Member
What suitable role would you find for him inside the club?
Could you imagine if he got a call from MUTV when Paddy Crerand calls time on his MUTV career?
The Roy Keane Show...
That would be bloody TV Gold.
What suitable role would you find for him inside the club?
True: Slapped Dean Whitehead in the dressing room, said Clive Clarke's heartattack was a surprise because he showed no heart in his team and sent Dwight Yorke to train with the kids because he felt Yorke had more influence on the players than he did. You can put as many quotes as you want when it comes to who likes Keane, but the facts are he devides opinion. And when you're a manager, you never want to do that.False: Keane is a negative influence on the dressing room.
Are they anywhere near as high profile though?i'm always amazed how everyone turns a blind eye to Robbo's indiscretions and lack of professionalism whist would be the same people who would criticise Keane for his.
That's not true to be fair. Keane's criticisms are hindsight type stuff. Guarantee there were more excuses made for Roy Keane by the fans (myself included) when he played for us. Keane was involved in a brawl and was arrested just because the FA Cup final one year. During the biggest week of Sir Alex's life (the week before the CL final) he was up one morning with Steve McLaren and Head of Security Ned Kelly sorting that out. But we all took it with a pinch of salt because it was Keano. Facts are, you always treat your heroes differently. Even Ferguson treated Cantona with kid gloves.i'm always amazed how everyone turns a blind eye to Robbo's indiscretions and lack of professionalism whist would be the same people who would criticise Keane for his.
Oh, it'll be pro Keane. Very very pro Keane.
Are they anywhere near as high profile though?
I'd say Robbo was a great captain off the field. Robbo liked a drink, he wasnt Paul Gascoigne. He had the respect of everyone in the dressing room. He was the man who balanced the drinking culture out when Fergie wanted the days of long nights out finished. If you read any United book from the 90s, Robbo was essential in helping the likes of Giggs, Keane, Sharpe and the like settle into the club. Schmeichel, Bruce, Pallister Robson, Irwin and Hughes all shared the bond because they were social with each other off the pitch as well as on it. The team spirit of that 92-95 team was arguably the best in Fergie's tenure here.Probably not but Robbo may not affected his performances but he sure did affect those around him, it will be an unpopular view but Robbo off the pitch wasn't a great captain.
Give me a few examples where Scholes wasnt spot on? It'a harsh what he says but mostly still true.The thing is, Sir Alex Ferguson is probably the biggest cnut alive. He was a great manager and I had no real issue with his style of management due to how beneficial it was to the club I support.
But there's no doubt about it, you would not like Fergie if you were an opposition fan or player. Some of it was just trolling by him, but he could be genuinely nasty. He's certainly no angelic gentleman. Sir or not.
For anyone who has any issue with Keane, look at how their beloved "Ginger Prince" Scholes has conducted himself since retiring. Keane is often just brutally honest in his analysis. Scholes sounds bitter that the Ferguson era is over and often comes across as a puppet.
Keane vs Vieira in the tunnel should be enough to prove to any United fan where his loyalties were and still are. He loves this club. He still goes to games with his son. United through and through.
The Rooney worship is a bit much, but generally, yeah, I find myself agreeing with most of what he says. Thing is, his bluntness isnt a new thing. That's what his team mates have said about him since he was 20. He just comes out with some real shit occassionally.Give me a few examples where Scholes wasnt spot on? It'a harsh what he says but mostly still true.
Seconded, forgot about that, really deluded when it comes to Rooney.The Rooney worship is a bit much, but generally, yeah, I find myself agreeing with most of what he says.
Give me a few examples where Scholes wasnt spot on? It'a harsh what he says but mostly still true.
Yeah right.. it might be bitter or harsh, doesnt make it any less true.Everything he says. It's not 1995. He's like an old dinosaur with his views.
From Keane's perspective, there had been a lowering of standards with the club finishing 3rd in the previous two seasons and to be fair, at that time, he was playing alongside the likes of Bellion, Miller and Gibson.
Keane and Fergie were too similar.
What suitable role would you find for him inside the club?
It depends exactly how bad you think he is. He left his only two clubs in the relegation zone. No amount of praise from past players or colleagues can change that.
The overall style of football was changing from being a pure adrenaline sport to something which was more artful and cultured. These players needed to be dealt with in a certain way and Keane was definitely not up for it.
Some people have a lot of time on their hands.
Terrible book.I read his second book a couple of weeks ago and to be honest I found him to be quite boring, he even says so himself.
Says the man with 33,332 postsSome people have a lot of time on their hands.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/bringing-back-the-united-philosophy-roy-keane-for-manager.416682/He does say a lot of bullshit at times. What suitable role would you find for him inside the club?
Why isn't Roy Keane mentioned more as a candidate for United manager?
For the last three seasons, I have watched United's identity slip away both on and off the pitch. I have seen us play conservative football and draw or lose games with a whimper. I have seen the manager and player interviews after a game where they look so flat and crestfallen. No one fears us in the way they did any more. And I think to myself... this is not the United I know.
That loss of winning mentality arrived when Ferguson retired. It is the result of Moyes who, for example, accepted Liverpool were coming to Old Trafford as favourites and said we have to aspire to City's level. It is the result of Van Gaal and his defence-first football. I hate to disappoint anyone hoping for Mourinho, but his approach is not so different. These managers have their own philosophies, but it is not the United philosophy, and Ferguson isn't coming back.
Then I remember Keane, the most successful captain in our history...
He had an intensity leading the team onto the pitch which fortified his team-mates and intimidated the opposition before the game even kicked-off. We played the game with fight and energy, excitement and goals. Whenever United were behind we could be sure the opposition box would be under siege from wave after wave of attack during the final minutes. When we did lose, Keane, like Ferguson, would have fire in his eyes. We need that anger and edge to our game. It was a resolve and winning mentality even in defeat that said woe betide our next opponents. This is the mentality I want to see back at United.
Whilst that was in his playing days, many have commented that Keane's main strength wasn't in his football skill but in his motivational ability. His passion, drive, hunger, desire and will-to-win spread throughout the team. Keane retains those attributes, not to mention a love of United, which are equally as applicable in management as in his captaincy.
I know some will say Keane has made mistakes (the infamous MUTV interview, for example) but much of that was over a decade ago. Keane is now 44 years old and an experienced manager of 10 years at Championship, Premier League and International levels.
I also know there is the fallout with Ferguson but alongside that both have continued to offer great praise and compliments to each other over the years. As a business relationship I don't think it is anything that cannot be fixed. Keane and Niall Quinn had a much worse fallout before going on to have a successful manager/chairman relationship at Sunderland.
I have a lot of evidence I can share on the thread in the way of quoted testimony to Keane's motivational skills, how he has developed and improved players, the praise he has received from former team-mates and players he has managed, recommendations for him in a management role, etc.
It certainly worked for Guardiola at Barcelona, Simeone at Atletico, Conte at Juventus and de Boer at Ajax – these are all former leaders and captains of those teams who carried the philosophy they developed in their playing days back into management of the clubs.
Likewise, I believe Roy Keane is the only manager who can now bring the United philosophy back to Old Trafford and continue the dynasty of Matt Busby and Alex Ferguson.
What about you?
Lovely thread but it still doesnt change the fact that Robson was better.
I do prefer Robson to Keane but I was just stirring a bit with that comment.Spot on Stack. Two great players but Robson every time.
summed up in just one post, the op could of saved a lot of timeThat's a lot of words for the few points no-one disputes.
Brilliant, brilliant player and leader.
Rubbish manager.
Idiot of a man.
I do prefer Robson to Keane but I was just stirring a bit with that comment.
Youn are however spot on when saying they were 2 great players. I see these claims that Keane doesnt get proper recognition, I dont get that at all. I think Keane is seen as one of our greats and that he gets a decent chunk of credit for the successes we had when he played. He gets great recognition.