If Keano in his prime was in our first eleven right now, there's not a hope the past three performances would have happened.
Since it doesn't seem like we disagree much on the other points, I will only address the last part of your post. It is hard to make a bullet proof argument about our football in those last years under Fergie as one's exciting football is not everyone else's. I would however argue that there was a general consensus on this board among other that our football was hardly comparable to the best teams in Europe or even the likes of Dortmund or City in that period. The transfer of Kagawa I remember generated so much buzz because people were hoping he will change that to no avail of course. I would also cite our performances against the likes of City, Chelsea, Real and Liverpool or even the likes of Bilbao where all we did is sit back behind the ball losing the midfield and being pressed all over the pitch relying on the individual brilliance of Van Persie, Scholes or Rooney. I don't know about you but that's not what I'd call performances befitting one of the biggest clubs in the world. Against the rest of the league, our games were either ones where we got our noses up front and sat back behind the ball to defend a lead or ones where we did not defend well and ended up throwing the kitchen sink which albeit being exciting and enthralling, is still indicative that we were very flawed.Again I agree with your comments on Fergie above, in particular the bolded text – and it sounds absolutely fecking brilliant to me: getting the basics right, pace, power, bravery, attacking football, risk taking, an alpha personality – oh yes, that is what United should be. On the other hand, your suggestion that, in later years, this approach did not produce dominant football and... 'zombie football'... I have no idea what you are talking about. It was van Gaal that produced 'zombie football' with his overload of tactics to the players that ruined their natural game. The way I saw it is that United were successful and entertaining to the end of Ferguson's tenure and the records and stats support that also. I'll take that every time over the errr, 'innovative coaching' that has overseen the club's slide the past two-plus seasons.
With that, we have gone full circle back to discussion on the 'Origins of Our on Field Problems: Ferguson's Final Years vs Post Ferguson Years' thread.
I'm in awe of Gav's dedication here.
If Keano in his prime was in our first eleven right now, there's not a hope the past three performances would have happened.
scary stuff. Some nice ones there but don't get on their wrong side.You don't need to tell me about Cork. My wife is from there
There aren't too many actual box to box players around, few to none of Keane's style as the game has moved on. Maybe a blend of Busquets and Schweinsteiger.Sorry, I can't start a new thread as I'm still newbie. It's the first Roy Keane thread I could find.
My question was for the 'old heads' when we signed Keane, did you know he was going to be a captain that he ended up being?
Is there any players in the least (in our squad) resemble Keane right now? I know it's a different time, different era, but please be positive, give us something. Hererra?
How did you react to Keane giving that interview? Obviously, that squad turned out to be very successful but did you agree with with him then? And would you want a critical evaluation of our squad now, like he did then? To give our players a kick up the arse, essentially.
Very sorry for grammar. I'm very drunk.
False: Keane left United due to criticism of his teammates on MUTV
The common held belief is that after a 4-1 loss to Middlesbrough, Keane gave an interview to MUTV where he criticised a number of players, specifically van der Sar, O'Shea, Ferdinand, Fletcher, Richardson and Alan Smith. The criticism was such that Ferguson had to pull the video from being aired and subsequently terminated Keane's contract with the club mid-season due to his destabilising influence on the dressing room.
Whilst it is true that Ferguson told Keane, “that interview was a disgrace, a joke. Criticising your teammates. And wanting that to go out”, the fact is, when done in private, Ferguson didn't mind Keane's criticism of teammates: -
“If Roy Keane thought you weren't pulling your weight he would be right on top of you, straight away. Many players faced his wrath for committing that crime and there would be no place to hide from him. I never felt that was a bad aspect of his character.”
And let's not forget that the video was never released and Keane remained very much a part of the first team following the incident.
Furthermore, the players named were not offended by the comments which Keane had discussed with them and have since given glowing references of Keane's influence. Alan Smith even credited Keane's MUTV criticism for the much improved 1-0 victory over Chelsea in the very next game with another of the players he singled out, Fletcher, scoring the winning goal.
So now we have established that Ferguson didn't eject Keane on the basis of the video, that the players were not offended, if anything their performances improved and that it was mostly a media driven furore over a few leaked excerpts of the interview, why did Ferguson terminate Keane's contract?
The truth is there had been a building tension and deteriorating relationship between Keane, Ferguson and his assistant, Carlos Queiroz, for some time...
From Keane's perspective, there had been a lowering of standards with the club finishing 3rd in the previous two seasons and to be fair, at that time, he was playing alongside the likes of Bellion, Miller and Gibson. Phil Neville, Nicky Butt and David Beckham had recently left, Vidic and Evra were yet to join and Ronaldo was far from the finished article, having scored only 15 goals in 90 games up to that point. Keane felt the Rock of Gibraltar legal battle was not in the interest of United and that Ferguson had not done enough to prevent the slide. He also felt mistreated and disrespected by Quieroz during training sessions. It is fair to say that Keane, winner that he is, was feeling a lot of frustration at that point.
From Ferguson and Quieroz's perspective, there was an issue that Keane had chosen his own accommodation during the pre-season tour of Portugal, he challenged the training methods in a player meeting and they were having trouble getting Keane to adhere to a more restrained deep-lying midfield role despite his increasing number of injuries.
The killer blow, the nail in the coffin, the coup de grace to Keane's United career came in a meeting of the management and players where, against the backdrop above, in front of the team, Ferguson called the interview a disgrace and invited the players to join his condemnation of Keane, and Queiroz then questioned Keane's loyalty.
Honestly, what did they think would happen? My god, you do not question Roy Keane's integrity and loyalty and not expect fireworks. With all the heart, soul and winning mentallity that had driven United's success for over a decade, Keane erupted and tore into the pair of them in front of everyone.
That is what led Ferguson to state, “Roy absolutely overstepped the line”. That is why Keane later accepted his temperament had cost him. It was that particular confrontation in the meeting, not Keane's criticism of his teammates, that led Ferguson to push Keane out of the door.
Avoidable? Keane wouldn't be the force he was had he accepted United's decline. Ferguson wouldn't be the manager he was had he accepted Keane's defiance. In the end, an unavoidable clash of two hugely influential winning personalities who each wanted the best for United. Yet as we all know, no one contests Ferguson's control and it was destined to end only one way.
Great great player Keano, on a lighter note nice to see him and Giggs having a bit of banter.
Great great player Keano, on a lighter note nice to see him and Giggs having a bit of banter.
I think he might be just as well staying at Ireland until after Russia 2018 and then seeing what the United manager situation is. You know, Conte went straight from Italy to Chelsea, so why can't Keane go straight from Ireland to United? I know Conte won Serie A with Juventus prior to that, but that's the chance Keane has not yet had. Which reminds me....
I was watching the 1996 FA Cup semi vs Chelsea on the box last night.
With the passing of time and fading memory, I had undervalued how much Keane contributed to the team in attack. He spent a lot of time in and around of the box. Often ahead of the play, getting into wide positions, beating players and getting in crosses.
Unfortunately it's easier to talk him up as a midfield hatchet man and airbrush his play making contribution.
Fascinating post. I totally agree re.. "Keane felt the Rock of Gibraltar legal battle was not in the interest of United", that's clear from lots of contributions he has made. All I want to know is, what did he say in the dressing room? What were the words that overstepped the mark?False: Keane left United due to criticism of his teammates on MUTV
The common held belief is that after a 4-1 loss to Middlesbrough, Keane gave an interview to MUTV where he criticised a number of players, specifically van der Sar, O'Shea, Ferdinand, Fletcher, Richardson and Alan Smith. The criticism was such that Ferguson had to pull the video from being aired and subsequently terminated Keane's contract with the club mid-season due to his destabilising influence on the dressing room.
Whilst it is true that Ferguson told Keane, “that interview was a disgrace, a joke. Criticising your teammates. And wanting that to go out”, the fact is, when done in private, Ferguson didn't mind Keane's criticism of teammates: -
“If Roy Keane thought you weren't pulling your weight he would be right on top of you, straight away. Many players faced his wrath for committing that crime and there would be no place to hide from him. I never felt that was a bad aspect of his character.”
And let's not forget that the video was never released and Keane remained very much a part of the first team following the incident.
Furthermore, the players named were not offended by the comments which Keane had discussed with them and have since given glowing references of Keane's influence. Alan Smith even credited Keane's MUTV criticism for the much improved 1-0 victory over Chelsea in the very next game with another of the players he singled out, Fletcher, scoring the winning goal.
So now we have established that Ferguson didn't eject Keane on the basis of the video, that the players were not offended, if anything their performances improved and that it was mostly a media driven furore over a few leaked excerpts of the interview, why did Ferguson terminate Keane's contract?
The truth is there had been a building tension and deteriorating relationship between Keane, Ferguson and his assistant, Carlos Queiroz, for some time...
From Keane's perspective, there had been a lowering of standards with the club finishing 3rd in the previous two seasons and to be fair, at that time, he was playing alongside the likes of Bellion, Miller and Gibson. Phil Neville, Nicky Butt and David Beckham had recently left, Vidic and Evra were yet to join and Ronaldo was far from the finished article, having scored only 15 goals in 90 games up to that point. Keane felt the Rock of Gibraltar legal battle was not in the interest of United and that Ferguson had not done enough to prevent the slide. He also felt mistreated and disrespected by Quieroz during training sessions. It is fair to say that Keane, winner that he is, was feeling a lot of frustration at that point.
From Ferguson and Quieroz's perspective, there was an issue that Keane had chosen his own accommodation during the pre-season tour of Portugal, he challenged the training methods in a player meeting and they were having trouble getting Keane to adhere to a more restrained deep-lying midfield role despite his increasing number of injuries.
The killer blow, the nail in the coffin, the coup de grace to Keane's United career came in a meeting of the management and players where, against the backdrop above, in front of the team, Ferguson called the interview a disgrace and invited the players to join his condemnation of Keane, and Queiroz then questioned Keane's loyalty.
Honestly, what did they think would happen? My god, you do not question Roy Keane's integrity and loyalty and not expect fireworks. With all the heart, soul and winning mentallity that had driven United's success for over a decade, Keane erupted and tore into the pair of them in front of everyone.
That is what led Ferguson to state, “Roy absolutely overstepped the line”. That is why Keane later accepted his temperament had cost him. It was that particular confrontation in the meeting, not Keane's criticism of his teammates, that led Ferguson to push Keane out of the door.
Avoidable? Keane wouldn't be the force he was had he accepted United's decline. Ferguson wouldn't be the manager he was had he accepted Keane's defiance. In the end, an unavoidable clash of two hugely influential winning personalities who each wanted the best for United. Yet as we all know, no one contests Ferguson's control and it was destined to end only one way.
Roy Keane gave his heart and soul for United and he was one of the primary reasons why we never let the standards drop during his stint as club captain. However, with time, you have to change your style of functioning as well and the one thing with Keane was that he is completely rigid and inflexible. Probably that's one of the reasons for his relative lack of success as a manager.
The player dynamics had already changed during his later years and he just couldn't cope with it. The good old style edge of the seat stuff, running around the field for the entire match, blood and sweat style of play was slowly becoming passe even in the PL with the emergence of skillful players both from mainland Europe and closer home.
The overall style of football was changing from being a pure adrenaline sport to something which was more artful and cultured. These players needed to be dealt with in a certain way and Keane was definitely not up for it. For him, there was only one way to get your football education. Idolize your seniors, work your butt off on the field and earn your place. I feel this whole difference in culture partly contributed to how it ended up.
Basically he is spamming the forum with all the previous comments he has made about Roy. I expect to see similar threads on the other forums the OP belongs to. Roy should seek on order of protection this level of obsession is usually a bad sign.
Amongst all the posters, papers with quotes about Roy, you know there is a very creepy shrine built and possibly a flesh light with Roy's face.