Clearing up some myths about Roy Keane

If Keano in his prime was in our first eleven right now, there's not a hope the past three performances would have happened.
 
Again I agree with your comments on Fergie above, in particular the bolded text – and it sounds absolutely fecking brilliant to me: getting the basics right, pace, power, bravery, attacking football, risk taking, an alpha personality – oh yes, that is what United should be. On the other hand, your suggestion that, in later years, this approach did not produce dominant football and... 'zombie football'... I have no idea what you are talking about. It was van Gaal that produced 'zombie football' with his overload of tactics to the players that ruined their natural game. The way I saw it is that United were successful and entertaining to the end of Ferguson's tenure and the records and stats support that also. I'll take that every time over the errr, 'innovative coaching' that has overseen the club's slide the past two-plus seasons.

With that, we have gone full circle back to discussion on the 'Origins of Our on Field Problems: Ferguson's Final Years vs Post Ferguson Years' thread.
Since it doesn't seem like we disagree much on the other points, I will only address the last part of your post. It is hard to make a bullet proof argument about our football in those last years under Fergie as one's exciting football is not everyone else's. I would however argue that there was a general consensus on this board among other that our football was hardly comparable to the best teams in Europe or even the likes of Dortmund or City in that period. The transfer of Kagawa I remember generated so much buzz because people were hoping he will change that to no avail of course. I would also cite our performances against the likes of City, Chelsea, Real and Liverpool or even the likes of Bilbao where all we did is sit back behind the ball losing the midfield and being pressed all over the pitch relying on the individual brilliance of Van Persie, Scholes or Rooney. I don't know about you but that's not what I'd call performances befitting one of the biggest clubs in the world. Against the rest of the league, our games were either ones where we got our noses up front and sat back behind the ball to defend a lead or ones where we did not defend well and ended up throwing the kitchen sink which albeit being exciting and enthralling, is still indicative that we were very flawed.

After Fergie, the only relatively modern manager we had is LvG and his tenure was overall a disappointment. That however doesn't mean that a more coaching/tactical oriented approach does not work. A quick glimpse at the best teams in the world would tell you that. We sadly don't exist in our own little island where we play by our own rules. We have to adapt to the modern order whether we like it or not because everybody else is. You seem to equate the failure of individuals with the failure of a system which I think is a very common attitude. People don't like someone's coaching, rightfully and then go on to write off everything he did from his performance, principles and ideas. My point is that just because LvG failed in the end, not everything he stood for or believe in is wrong.
 
Just read an interview with Shane Long and he was talking about Keano. Suppose this thread is as good a place as any to share what he had to say.

No, do you know what, around the floor here with the lads he sits in and he's a great laugh, he's very sharp, quick with his banter you know? Funny, very funny.

He's probably the best player that's ever come out of Ireland, he's played at the biggest club at their best time, so he's obviously used to the best of the best and he wants to bring Ireland to that standard to compete, and he has brought an element of that with him. Tempo in training is a lot higher now and he wouldn't be afraid to stop it and pull out the people who aren't pulling their weight. He keeps everyone on their toes.

I think he just kind of... Has an angry head on him the whole time, but he's not actually grumpy, so people think he's grumpy.
 
@Keenst thanks for sharing, I'll add that to the collection. It's interesting to see the contrast between "he's a great laugh" during downtime and then "has an angry head on him the whole time" when it comes to training. It seems to me the latter is what gives him that focus, drive and will to win.
 
Sorry, I can't start a new thread as I'm still newbie. It's the first Roy Keane thread I could find.

My question was for the 'old heads' when we signed Keane, did you know he was going to be a captain that he ended up being?

Is there any players in the least (in our squad) resemble Keane right now? I know it's a different time, different era, but please be positive, give us something. Hererra?

How did you react to Keane giving that interview? Obviously, that squad turned out to be very successful but did you agree with with him then? And would you want a critical evaluation of our squad now, like he did then? To give our players a kick up the arse, essentially.

Very sorry for grammar. I'm very drunk.
 
Sorry, I can't start a new thread as I'm still newbie. It's the first Roy Keane thread I could find.

My question was for the 'old heads' when we signed Keane, did you know he was going to be a captain that he ended up being?

Is there any players in the least (in our squad) resemble Keane right now? I know it's a different time, different era, but please be positive, give us something. Hererra?

How did you react to Keane giving that interview? Obviously, that squad turned out to be very successful but did you agree with with him then? And would you want a critical evaluation of our squad now, like he did then? To give our players a kick up the arse, essentially.

Very sorry for grammar. I'm very drunk.
There aren't too many actual box to box players around, few to none of Keane's style as the game has moved on. Maybe a blend of Busquets and Schweinsteiger.
 
False: Keane left United due to criticism of his teammates on MUTV

The common held belief is that after a 4-1 loss to Middlesbrough, Keane gave an interview to MUTV where he criticised a number of players, specifically van der Sar, O'Shea, Ferdinand, Fletcher, Richardson and Alan Smith. The criticism was such that Ferguson had to pull the video from being aired and subsequently terminated Keane's contract with the club mid-season due to his destabilising influence on the dressing room.

Whilst it is true that Ferguson told Keane, “that interview was a disgrace, a joke. Criticising your teammates. And wanting that to go out”, the fact is, when done in private, Ferguson didn't mind Keane's criticism of teammates: -

“If Roy Keane thought you weren't pulling your weight he would be right on top of you, straight away. Many players faced his wrath for committing that crime and there would be no place to hide from him. I never felt that was a bad aspect of his character.”

And let's not forget that the video was never released and Keane remained very much a part of the first team following the incident.

Furthermore, the players named were not offended by the comments which Keane had discussed with them and have since given glowing references of Keane's influence. Alan Smith even credited Keane's MUTV criticism for the much improved 1-0 victory over Chelsea in the very next game with another of the players he singled out, Fletcher, scoring the winning goal.

So now we have established that Ferguson didn't eject Keane on the basis of the video, that the players were not offended, if anything their performances improved and that it was mostly a media driven furore over a few leaked excerpts of the interview, why did Ferguson terminate Keane's contract?

The truth is there had been a building tension and deteriorating relationship between Keane, Ferguson and his assistant, Carlos Queiroz, for some time...

From Keane's perspective, there had been a lowering of standards with the club finishing 3rd in the previous two seasons and to be fair, at that time, he was playing alongside the likes of Bellion, Miller and Gibson. Phil Neville, Nicky Butt and David Beckham had recently left, Vidic and Evra were yet to join and Ronaldo was far from the finished article, having scored only 15 goals in 90 games up to that point. Keane felt the Rock of Gibraltar legal battle was not in the interest of United and that Ferguson had not done enough to prevent the slide. He also felt mistreated and disrespected by Quieroz during training sessions. It is fair to say that Keane, winner that he is, was feeling a lot of frustration at that point.

From Ferguson and Quieroz's perspective, there was an issue that Keane had chosen his own accommodation during the pre-season tour of Portugal, he challenged the training methods in a player meeting and they were having trouble getting Keane to adhere to a more restrained deep-lying midfield role despite his increasing number of injuries.

The killer blow, the nail in the coffin, the coup de grace to Keane's United career came in a meeting of the management and players where, against the backdrop above, in front of the team, Ferguson called the interview a disgrace and invited the players to join his condemnation of Keane, and Queiroz then questioned Keane's loyalty.

Honestly, what did they think would happen? My god, you do not question Roy Keane's integrity and loyalty and not expect fireworks. With all the heart, soul and winning mentallity that had driven United's success for over a decade, Keane erupted and tore into the pair of them in front of everyone.

That is what led Ferguson to state, “Roy absolutely overstepped the line”. That is why Keane later accepted his temperament had cost him. It was that particular confrontation in the meeting, not Keane's criticism of his teammates, that led Ferguson to push Keane out of the door.

Avoidable? Keane wouldn't be the force he was had he accepted United's decline. Ferguson wouldn't be the manager he was had he accepted Keane's defiance. In the end, an unavoidable clash of two hugely influential winning personalities who each wanted the best for United. Yet as we all know, no one contests Ferguson's control and it was destined to end only one way.

I wonder what SAF thinks of Jose Mourinho publicly criticising his players ??
 
Supposedly Keane questioned SAF in that stand off infront of everyone, saying he was slipping. No coming back from that
 
Great great player Keano, on a lighter note nice to see him and Giggs having a bit of banter.

 
Great great player Keano, on a lighter note nice to see him and Giggs having a bit of banter.


He said he regretted that programme with ITV -- by all accounts, he's been on very good terms with Giggs, Scholes and Butt for a long time now. I'll have to find the reference for that though.
 
I think he might be just as well staying at Ireland until after Russia 2018 and then seeing what the United manager situation is. You know, Conte went straight from Italy to Chelsea, so why can't Keane go straight from Ireland to United? I know Conte won Serie A with Juventus prior to that, but that's the chance Keane has not yet had. Which reminds me....

I love Keano and understand what an awesome player he was. Like Ryan, playing for a country that is small fry in the world of the big fishes that regularly get to the finals of the European Championship or World Cup or win those competitions, has meant Keano's greatness has been underestimated.

However, with all due respect I observe that you're living in the past. Roy Keane, Steve, Bruce and Mark Hughes will never become Manchester United manager unless they actually have some noteworthy success with clubs such as a prestigious trophy at home or in Europe, or consistently making the upper echelons of the league table and challenging for trophies and European places. For real.

The 'Sir Alex was given time and patience' and 'Sir Alex stayed around for over two decades' were only possible in a different era. Alex Ferguson as he was when he was recruited by United had brought success to clubs that lacked the resources of their bigger named rivals. He was given time at United because although Ron Atkinson had brought United a kind of swagger and a piece of silverware, a common pattern of no title success and inconsistency along with a lack of real drive to take United back to the top was also in evidence.

Keano and other United former players cannot seriously expect to come in after what has been Manchester United's most sustained period of success including European success and gigantic success in reinventing itself as a brand.

They don't have any real record of success as managers to be given the reins at United - they would be a step down just as David Moyes was a huge mistake. Manchester United looked and was in fact amateurish in giving way to Sir Alex's frankly ridiculous pushing of Moyes.

Only if a former United player is involved with renewed genuine success under Mourinho can they have any hope of becoming Manchester United manager. Ryan could do this if he is part of a new United team that takes the club back to its recent heights. Or if he goes off to manage and does something really big with a club that lacks the resources of the big club. However, look at Keano, Brucey and Hughes for a warning as to why that would be very difficult.
 
I was watching the 1996 FA Cup semi vs Chelsea on the box last night.
With the passing of time and fading memory, I had undervalued how much Keane contributed to the team in attack. He spent a lot of time in and around of the box. Often ahead of the play, getting into wide positions, beating players and getting in crosses.

Unfortunately it's easier to talk him up as a midfield hatchet man and airbrush his play making contribution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Penna
I was watching the 1996 FA Cup semi vs Chelsea on the box last night.
With the passing of time and fading memory, I had undervalued how much Keane contributed to the team in attack. He spent a lot of time in and around of the box. Often ahead of the play, getting into wide positions, beating players and getting in crosses.

Unfortunately it's easier to talk him up as a midfield hatchet man and airbrush his play making contribution.

That's because when he left he didn't play like he did in 96 much like Scholes was a different player at the end.
 
False: Keane left United due to criticism of his teammates on MUTV

The common held belief is that after a 4-1 loss to Middlesbrough, Keane gave an interview to MUTV where he criticised a number of players, specifically van der Sar, O'Shea, Ferdinand, Fletcher, Richardson and Alan Smith. The criticism was such that Ferguson had to pull the video from being aired and subsequently terminated Keane's contract with the club mid-season due to his destabilising influence on the dressing room.

Whilst it is true that Ferguson told Keane, “that interview was a disgrace, a joke. Criticising your teammates. And wanting that to go out”, the fact is, when done in private, Ferguson didn't mind Keane's criticism of teammates: -

“If Roy Keane thought you weren't pulling your weight he would be right on top of you, straight away. Many players faced his wrath for committing that crime and there would be no place to hide from him. I never felt that was a bad aspect of his character.”

And let's not forget that the video was never released and Keane remained very much a part of the first team following the incident.

Furthermore, the players named were not offended by the comments which Keane had discussed with them and have since given glowing references of Keane's influence. Alan Smith even credited Keane's MUTV criticism for the much improved 1-0 victory over Chelsea in the very next game with another of the players he singled out, Fletcher, scoring the winning goal.

So now we have established that Ferguson didn't eject Keane on the basis of the video, that the players were not offended, if anything their performances improved and that it was mostly a media driven furore over a few leaked excerpts of the interview, why did Ferguson terminate Keane's contract?

The truth is there had been a building tension and deteriorating relationship between Keane, Ferguson and his assistant, Carlos Queiroz, for some time...

From Keane's perspective, there had been a lowering of standards with the club finishing 3rd in the previous two seasons and to be fair, at that time, he was playing alongside the likes of Bellion, Miller and Gibson. Phil Neville, Nicky Butt and David Beckham had recently left, Vidic and Evra were yet to join and Ronaldo was far from the finished article, having scored only 15 goals in 90 games up to that point. Keane felt the Rock of Gibraltar legal battle was not in the interest of United and that Ferguson had not done enough to prevent the slide. He also felt mistreated and disrespected by Quieroz during training sessions. It is fair to say that Keane, winner that he is, was feeling a lot of frustration at that point.

From Ferguson and Quieroz's perspective, there was an issue that Keane had chosen his own accommodation during the pre-season tour of Portugal, he challenged the training methods in a player meeting and they were having trouble getting Keane to adhere to a more restrained deep-lying midfield role despite his increasing number of injuries.

The killer blow, the nail in the coffin, the coup de grace to Keane's United career came in a meeting of the management and players where, against the backdrop above, in front of the team, Ferguson called the interview a disgrace and invited the players to join his condemnation of Keane, and Queiroz then questioned Keane's loyalty.

Honestly, what did they think would happen? My god, you do not question Roy Keane's integrity and loyalty and not expect fireworks. With all the heart, soul and winning mentallity that had driven United's success for over a decade, Keane erupted and tore into the pair of them in front of everyone.

That is what led Ferguson to state, “Roy absolutely overstepped the line”. That is why Keane later accepted his temperament had cost him. It was that particular confrontation in the meeting, not Keane's criticism of his teammates, that led Ferguson to push Keane out of the door.

Avoidable? Keane wouldn't be the force he was had he accepted United's decline. Ferguson wouldn't be the manager he was had he accepted Keane's defiance. In the end, an unavoidable clash of two hugely influential winning personalities who each wanted the best for United. Yet as we all know, no one contests Ferguson's control and it was destined to end only one way.
Fascinating post. I totally agree re.. "Keane felt the Rock of Gibraltar legal battle was not in the interest of United", that's clear from lots of contributions he has made. All I want to know is, what did he say in the dressing room? What were the words that overstepped the mark?
 
Roy Keane gave his heart and soul for United and he was one of the primary reasons why we never let the standards drop during his stint as club captain. However, with time, you have to change your style of functioning as well and the one thing with Keane was that he is completely rigid and inflexible. Probably that's one of the reasons for his relative lack of success as a manager.

The player dynamics had already changed during his later years and he just couldn't cope with it. The good old style edge of the seat stuff, running around the field for the entire match, blood and sweat style of play was slowly becoming passe even in the PL with the emergence of skillful players both from mainland Europe and closer home.

The overall style of football was changing from being a pure adrenaline sport to something which was more artful and cultured. These players needed to be dealt with in a certain way and Keane was definitely not up for it. For him, there was only one way to get your football education. Idolize your seniors, work your butt off on the field and earn your place. I feel this whole difference in culture partly contributed to how it ended up.

What? Keane was one of the most artful and cultured players I have seen.
 
Basically he is spamming the forum with all the previous comments he has made about Roy. I expect to see similar threads on the other forums the OP belongs to. Roy should seek on order of protection this level of obsession is usually a bad sign.

Amongst all the posters, papers with quotes about Roy, you know there is a very creepy shrine built and possibly a flesh light with Roy's face.
:)
 
However, this thread is still relevant re the debate about Keano's status at United and in football, and whether he can seriously be a contender for the United job in the future.

Keano was definitely not too old school for United at the end of his career with us. He was not simply a box to box midfielder of the type that is becoming rarer in English football. His skill level and his vision were on par with any of the famous names of cultured European players.

At his peak he was up there with the top 5 midfielders in the world. He left United because his body could not have taken much more in a club such as United with its fixtures, and he also was reverting to the honest Roy type openly around Sir Alex.

There is definitely truth in the comments that he was old fashioned in the context of the young generation of less committed, more financially privileged from the game, more narcissistic football players. Then again, look at Rio for an example of the best of the the younger generation - a player of passion, United through and through although he was a Cockney, made some mistakes and was a bit too big on his social profile, but tough and incredibly skilled.

I'd love to see a Manchester United management/coaching team of Roy, Brucey, Hughesy, Ryan, Nicky Butt, Gary Nev, and Scholesy. But unless one of the first four named actually has real success at another club, it aint happening. What a pity.
 
Last edited:
Best midfielder in Premier League history in terms of peak. Shame he doesn't get as much love as Scholes.