PL used to be the most competitive and exciting league in the world which enable it to generate incomes far above other leagues.
PL is sabotaging itself if they let City's have their way. PL will be like Bundesliga - BM, Ligue 1 - PSG, PL - City. These 3 teams are too far ahead of the rest and it kills the competitiveness and excitement.
United won the whole thing all but two years between 92 and 2000 didn’t they?
After that, Chelsea joining the party is the only thing that kept it from being a 3 team league.
City is on a decent run, but they gave t even locked down the title this year …. Yet, and the competition for spots, all the way into the middle of the table, is extremely strong.
United isn’t winning like they used to, but the league is a lot more competitive than it was “back then” as a whole.
The PL should never put themselves in a position of losing out on talent and market share to other leagues just to compensate for bad owners at historic clubs.
If they want to set spending limits? Fine, but those limits should be high. There should be more concern with the best teams in England competing with the best teams in Europe than there is over the spend budget of the Luton Town’s of the world; that’s ridiculous.
And the spending limits should be fair. The idea that one team should be able to spend more money than another because their money came from Jersey sales is stupid. It was an obvious attempt to cement the position of certain teams.
City should get busted, but because they committed fraud, not because the FFP rules are in any way a remotely fair or good idea.
Didn’t the City of Madrid once sell Real land for 30m then buy it back from them for like 500m?
On a larger scale FFP is an artificial way to keep historic leagues from getting passed over as well.
It’s all a joke, and United would be benefitting from this incredibly, but you have the worst owners in Pro Sports. But that isn’t every other team in Englands fault. That problem is hopefully being remedied with Ineos.