Billy Jim
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2010
- Messages
- 429
People talking up Jesus all game but I only saw one player out there who’s literally risen from the dead.
Quality player.
Quality player.
Pogba might be physically done at this stage.
Nah. It's what we expected Pogba to be all these years playing deep.What we expected Mata to be all these years.
People talking up Jesus all game but I only saw one player out there who’s literally risen from the dead.
Quality player.
Not sure if that's about passing, imo it's more spatial awareness, focus, and in general he has a beautiful mind of a midfielder. Pogba had the skills but lacked the brain. He also didn't know how to use his physicality.It's funny how long we tried to make Pogba work playing deep. Eriksen comes in and looks a million times better and more suited to it even if he's out of position doing it than Pogba ever was. Just a more natural deep passer. Eriksen and Bruno having a great relationship between themselves already too. Good to see. We'll need to rotate him in the cup games especially, can't see him surviving if he plays in those, but what a difference he is.
Wrong question, how would they play togetherWould FdJ have been any better in this position than him?
Yup for sure. Just knowing where to pass, knowing where to move, knowing when to slow down play and when to play that killer ball. Pogba looked like he was bored to play simple passes and always wanted to speed it up and play the hollywood ball. You just can't have that in deep midfield. He has the brain of a #10 essentially, whereas Eriksen is mentally so much more suited to being used deep.Not sure if that's about passing, imo it's more spatial awareness, focus, and in general he has a beautiful mind of a midfielder. Pogba had the skills but lacked the brain. He also didn't know how to use his physicality.
Well playedPeople talking up Jesus all game but I only saw one player out there who’s literally risen from the dead.
Quality player.
Bit harsh. Mata was quality in an attacking mid role except he got played out of position most of the time on the right wing.What we expected Mata to be all these years.
Indeed, well put. I never liked him in the midfield for that reason. He didn't make us "click". Pogba had a good midfield performance when he scored or assisted, so judging by metrics used for attackers not midfielders.Yup for sure. Just knowing where to pass, knowing where to move, knowing when to slow down play and when to play that killer ball. Pogba looked like he was bored to play simple passes and always wanted to speed it up and play the hollywood ball. You just can't have that in deep midfield. He has the brain of a #10 essentially, whereas Eriksen is mentally so much more suited to being used deep.
FfsIt's funny how long we tried to make Pogba work playing deep. Eriksen comes in and looks a million times better and more suited to it even if he's out of position doing it than Pogba ever was. Just a more natural deep passer. Eriksen and Bruno having a great relationship between themselves already too. Good to see. We'll need to rotate him in the cup games especially, can't see him surviving if he plays in those, but what a difference he is.
Matas right wing position isnt out of position though, hes played and excelled there most of his career.Bit harsh. Mata was quality in an attacking mid role except he got played out of position most of the time on the right wing.
It's funny how long we tried to make Pogba work playing deep. Eriksen comes in and looks a million times better and more suited to it even if he's out of position doing it than Pogba ever was. Just a more natural deep passer. Eriksen and Bruno having a great relationship between themselves already too. Good to see. We'll need to rotate him in the cup games especially, can't see him surviving if he plays in those, but what a difference he is.
feck, I’m stealing that. Nice.People talking up Jesus all game but I only saw one player out there who’s literally risen from the dead.
Quality player.
Oops
He just knows where the players are, that pass to Bruno was instant
If this summer thaught us one thing, caf experts know shitCaf experts were questioning this signing.
Great comparison, to be fair Pirlo probably should have played there from the start, the jury is still out on Eriksen but he too might have been better in the deep end to begin with.Not saying he's the same level but his switch from an attacking player into a playmaker from deep reminds me of Pirlo when he changed roles and became a walking metronome in the middle of the pitch.
FixedCaf “experts” were questioning this signing.