Abraxas
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2021
- Messages
- 6,313
He seems to be physically labouring at the moment. I think Fred's energy to help combat City might make the difference. We're not getting much of the ball anyway.
Good news he is back but i fear a few of you are doing the usual trick of building our players up whilst they are out injured. Eriksen is a great passer but he is lightweight and bypassed easily. We've got quite an easy run in with teams that should suit him but he would not have done us much good against Newcastle and i'd rather keep Casemiro and Fred against the better midfields in the league.
dont know why you got stick for that. he cant start in the final. we will get tore apart if he does.I got stick for this a couple of months ago. He's been horribly lightweight. He'll play a couple of great passes in a game but otherwise our midfield is worse with him in it. City will tear us apart with him in midfield.
I feel so too. Bring in a starting midfielder and Eriksen could be a fantastic squad option. Pick the right games for him, bring him on, when we need creativity from the bench and he should be absolutely fine.This guy hasn't been the same since his injury, but he is still one of the main reasons for our good season and even in his bad periods he gives us something (the assist yesterday and the pass that led to the goal against bournemouth). He should not be used against all teams and he shouldn't be a starter againts the top teams but he absolutly still has a role to play in our team. Give him some rest and use him wisely next season.
As far as I can remember as far back at spurs he’s always had a limited gas tank and would tire at the end of games especially in games where the intensity was high and he was required to do more defensive running.What are people attributing his limited gas tank to? Was he always this way (never noticed watched him at Spurs), is it down to the cardiac issue he had with Denmark, or is age just getting the better of him now?
I would argue the issue is he's slow rather than limited gas tank (might be a problem, but not THE problem). At some point in game as players get tired there's more space to cover and he fails miserably. He only has one speed, and the same applies to Casemiro so that is a really bad combo. This was the case even against Chelsea a few days ago.What are people attributing his limited gas tank to? Was he always this way (never noticed watched him at Spurs), is it down to the cardiac issue he had with Denmark, or is age just getting the better of him now?
What are people attributing his limited gas tank to? Was he always this way (never noticed watched him at Spurs), is it down to the cardiac issue he had with Denmark, or is age just getting the better of him now?
I would argue the issue is he's slow rather than limited gas tank (might be a problem, but not THE problem). At some point in game as players get tired there's more space to cover and he fails miserably. He only has one speed, and the same applies to Casemiro so that is a really bad combo. This was the case even against Chelsea a few days ago.
He's good on the ball but it doesn't make up for the fact the opposition can run around him and our midfield easily.
I wonder what is his role for next season. I think he will just play some very very easy home games, when we're not pressed and he can pass his way around.
I really don't think he is the guy you put for the last 20-30mins when you're struggling in midfield.
I fully agree. The problem is last 20-30' is when there's most ground to cover as players are getting tired. I don't particularly think Eriksen is the man to do that. When we're in control then it's fine, but we don't have a lot of those games so I expected his role to be drastically limited next season.I think he is a guy to bring on the last 20-30mins when we are in control of possesion and the game, not someone to chane the game, jsut continue controlling it. Personally though he is a very good player, i think he has also been over rated a lot at Spurs and very much so here this season too, especially by a fw pundits....but I still think he a role to play next seaon in the squad for sure.....if we progress and control more games in terms of the scoreline thatn we did this season
I fully agree. The problem is last 20-30' is when there's most ground to cover as players are getting tired. I don't particularly think Eriksen is the man to do that. When we're in control then it's fine, but we don't have a lot of those games so I expected his role to be drastically limited next season.
People always love players easy on the eye, Eriksen when not bothered by pressing looks efortless with his passing. He is also intelligent in his positioning but he's basically a ghost defensively:
I am really surprised this aspect of his game is ignored so easily as this is part of the reason we look so fragile away from home.
Also, I mentioned this many times but I truly think we peaked with Casemiro-Fred midfield. Not because Fred is the better player (mandatory comment), but because he brings more balance to midfield. He is however not easy on the eye.
What I like most about Fred is that Casemiro is more involved in the buildup as he doesn't need to be the last man in midfield always. This aspect is very overlooked. I am sure ETH also sees this what pursue of Mount would indicate.
Build up is important but it's equally important to do the dirty work in midfield, otherwise you play tennis game. Which is what happens when Eriksen plays in midfield against any decent opposition and in most away games.Fred isnt easy on the eye because he is shite and opening up the game for Bruno to thrive. While his defensive game is much better than Eriksen his passing is much worse.
Fred is simply not a viable option due to his lack of progressive passes and how few passes he does per 90 in general, which fits the eye test of a player who runs around a lot and does alot of defensive work but not enough build up.
Eriksen will feature much less next season I am sure precisely because of the reasons you outlined.
Mount is like a happy medium between Eriksen and Fred. Not quite as prolific in his long passing as Eriksen, or quite as good defensively as Fred, but better than both at progressive runs. Fully expect Fred to be sold.
Build up is important but it's equally important to do the dirty work in midfield, otherwise you play tennis game. Which is what happens when Eriksen plays in midfield against any decent opposition and in most away games.
Anyway, I'm just arguing ignoring defensive actions and focusing only on passing (that is exactly Fred vs Eriksen discussion) is just wrong. We had good results with "shite" Fred in the team this season. They contributed equally to this season success IMO.
I don't think he's shite at progressive, I think he's not very good at it- he just looks bad compared to Eriksen. Still I think he's been quite creative this season, he made those passess like assist to Bruno goal regularly (not often, but still this isn't something out of the blue). Out of curiosity, do you think Casemiro is better at this progressive passing?I said Fred was shite at progressive passes, not shite overall btw.
Either way I dont think we disagree in the overall point that we need a new partner for Casemiro next season.