sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,747
Given the amount of gametime we clearly plan on wringing out of him this season he was a good pick up on a free transfer.
Was given motm. Not sure about that but he was neat and tidy all evening
Give his technical ability to a player with an engine like Fred's and we'd steamroller teams. He's lovely to watch but I don't think he can play every game, we'll end up killing the poor guy.
He wouldn't start Arsenal game anyway. This game will be too tight and intense.
Already? Though he does gas out after 60 minutes. Not sure it's just fitness not being upto levels or it's his age/health.Solid, but his engines are cooling down a bit. Could use some time off.
On one side, we can tell how quality Eriksen is as a player ; just compare him with Bruno side by side, his passes are almost always spot on or at least you can tell the failed passes make sense to try , while Bruno's passes lack of consistency and receivers always have to adjust slightly to get on the balls and therefore miss the chances to handle them right away , not to mention that Bruno could sometime make those totally no-sense passes which land to nowhere.
On the other side, the team are not yet fully connected and we still lose too many passes which demand Eriksen to cover much grounds to recover the balls. Therefore we generally saw him dropping intensity in mid 2nd half . All in all, we may have to at least drop either Bruno or Rashford who I considered the roots of losing balls , otherwise we will consistently see Eriksen drop form in 2nd half .
I think the plan is to rely on him until we get Frenkie. Then we dont have to rely on him so much. His impact is instant and we let him go to Inter after Spurs. Just how stupid that was.
Only 'complaint' I have is that he has an air of absolutely not giving a feck. Think it's just his style, but he always looks like he couldn't care less
Only managed to catch the second half last night but thought he looked way off the pace.
Then towards the end of the game, he was named MOM so I'm presuming he was on fire first half or just another poor choice by the pundits?
Only managed to catch the second half last night but thought he looked way off the pace.
Then towards the end of the game, he was named MOM so I'm presuming he was on fire first half or just another poor choice by the pundits?
Exactly. He plays clever passes that ward off the opponents press and retain possesion. It's not blockbuster stuff but absolutely crucial. No chance I'd drop him as some are suggesting.I don't think those criticizing him realize he's the one dictating the style and speed of play. Which, to few, look like just ball recycling and thus boring.
Only managed to catch the second half last night but thought he looked way off the pace.
Then towards the end of the game, he was named MOM so I'm presuming he was on fire first half or just another poor choice by the pundits?
Just going to leave this hereI don't know if his lack of stamina is the main problem, he's really slow even in the first half. He plays his role quite good, but he's being found out when United get tired in general and he looks even worse.
Overall he's been good so far.
As with all of our players, the fitness to keep the intensity up over 90 mins will come over time.I don't know if his lack of stamina is the main problem, he's really slow even in the first half. He plays his role quite good, but he's being found out when United get tired in general and he looks even worse.
Overall he's been good so far.
If my memory serves me well, in his younger days he always ran around 13-14 kilometers a game
I don't think those criticizing him realize he's the one dictating the style and speed of play. Which, to few, look like just ball recycling and thus boring.
Our Kroos.