Danny1982
Sectarian Hipster
Game 6 started. e4 again!
Anand never got the initiative he needed. Playing without a plan it seems.
Does Magnus Carlsen make mistakes?
Very rarely. In the candidates tournament this year, Carlsen lost two of the last three games, and he almost lost chance to challenge Anand for the title.
Some called it a "mental collapse" or "cracking under pressure", and it's the glimmer of hope we have now hoping for an interesting match.
Towards the end of the game, he seems ruthless.
Having said that, a question, why does the evaluation line change, even after a series of optimal moves as determined by the computer?
If the probability of winning is X at move N and after consecutive M optimal moves, the probability should remain the same after move N + M, no?
It seems to keep changing. I understand that it's not a probability, having seen it show >1 in yesterday's game, but don't understand why it fluctuates.
Towards the end of the game, he seems ruthless.
Having said that, a question, why does the evaluation line change, even after a series of optimal moves as determined by the computer?
If the probability of winning is X at move N and after consecutive M optimal moves, the probability should remain the same after move N + M, no?
It seems to keep changing. I understand that it's not a probability, having seen it show >1 in yesterday's game, but don't understand why it fluctuates.
And Carlsen wins again!
4-2. Match over.
Just woke up and saw the result.. I'm not even going to see the game.
I feel bad for Anand.
Don't. It's pretty much the same story. Anand attacks, sacrifices a pawn, rook and pawn ending, objectively drawn position, Carlsen wins.
This is going to be fun now. Anand will have to attack, much more than he even did today.
The computer evaluation is not very accurate, it's just a rough estimation. If you make another move, the computer will analyse this line in more depth, and the evaluation could be affected because it now sees "new" things in the new depth, which could affect the evaluation a bit..
But generally small values don't matter, so if a player has an advantage of (0.4) for example, then that's basically not much. Advantages over 1 though does mean that the player has a significant advantage. 2 or more is usually winning.
Also, an optimal move doesn't necessarily mean it was the move the computer suggested in its analysis, which means there might be a small difference, but since the difference is not much, the computer still considers it an optimal move.
Perhaps a couple of silly questions here:
If Carlsen wins this tournament, and also has the nr. 1 ranking, how would this put him compared ot other all time greats? I realize that his lack of tenure might mean that it's way too early to draw comparisons to Kasparov, Fischer etc?
Second, why has Carlsen not been in this position before? It was my impression that he's been world nr. 1 for two or three years, yet why is this the first time he is able to World Champion?
He didn't take part in the previous candidates cycle (that decides the challenger). Carlsen will always suffer in comparisms to Kasparov and Fischer because of his style - he is a grinder. Using ELO points, he is already better than they ever were - but he needs to do it for a period to be considered better than them. Chess players will continuously get better over time - so somebodoy better than him will come along as well. However, if he continues at the present rate and dominates for 10-15 years (like Kasparov) he will be like the all time greats. It's much harder to compare him to older greats like Alekhine, or my favorites - Capablanca or Tal
Thansk, NM. Why hasn't he been in the previous cycles though?
Thanks.
Was Ra4 such a bad movie, as the evaluation line suggests?
Seems to me that even before that move, the advanced pawn in the f column already had won it for Carlsen.
Was not evident to me at that point, but retrospectively.
Even if Anand had moved b4 instead of Ra4, I can see only the same result happening.
Game 7 now started, let's hope Anand can bounce back to make this match interesting.
Any text link To follow this? In class so cant stream.
How has the game gone so far?
Yup.
What annoys me is that Anand lost two objectively drawn positions. Carlsen didn't even have to play brilliantly. Oh well - hopefully Vishy focuses on tourney play now.