Raul Madrid
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,457
If he had the players im sure he would. His Madrid team were not overly defensive.As if Jose's ever gonna go this attacking.
If he had the players im sure he would. His Madrid team were not overly defensive.As if Jose's ever gonna go this attacking.
Liverpool makes no sense for him when Arsenal are financially every bit as strong financially (far more if they want to flex), and as good a team too.I'm also shocked pool aren't quick on this one. They are spending a fortune trying to convince a lessor player to join them. While he is on the market for a similar price and would surely be the type of signing that would impress suarez. Chelseea's case is more understandable. They have too many no10's and mou preffers brawn over flair in midfield.
I don't think that team would work at all really.It is very slow and Mata, Rooney and Cesc would all be getting in each others way.It is going to be difficult enough to fit Rooney and Mata in the same team without adding Cesc to the mix.
We should be playing a proper 433 with pacy wideman.If Sanchez or Pedro are available I hope we go after them to accompany Januzaj on the wing, Konoplanka could do a job if not.
For midfield we need two box to box players.I think we should at least bid for Vidal, and sell him a project.There is no player better suited to us at the moment.
Strootman is a great option if he recovers but I'm not so sure about Schweinsteiger.He's a brilliant player but he's nearly 30.I'd be delighted to have him for 20M or less.
Arsenal are not in for him according to various media sources. Arsenal are stocked to the brim with players of his elk and i think their priority is DM, CF and RB. Fabregas would be a luxury signing Arsenal don't need.Liverpool makes no sense for him when Arsenal are financially every bit as strong financially (far more if they want to flex), and as good a team too.
I think it would be clever to not go for Fabregas simply because I don't think we need him. It is better going for a box-to-box midfielder like Strootman instead of a big money signing like Fabregas.
Why would you want to upset him?So he has agreed terms with Man city, now Chelsea.
Who is next ? Tottenham ?
I think it would be clever to not go for Fabregas simply because I don't think we need him. It is better going for a box-to-box midfielder like Strootman instead of a big money signing like Fabregas.
I know what ya mean but Strootman or a Vidal score goals from midfield and they are better defensively.We also need someone who can score goals from midfield, Fabregas is ideal for that role. And if the £30m price tag has any truth to it then surely he has to be worth a bid...
He has said he wants to play further forward. He will be in Mata's position.I see Fabregas has an offensive Box to Box, in the Scholes tradition. Having him for 30m-40m would be terrific.
They probably think he's too deer.Arsenal are not in for him according to various media sources. Arsenal are stocked to the brim with players of his elk and i think their priority is DM, CF and RB. Fabregas would be a luxury signing Arsenal don't need.
Liverpool makes perfect sense for both parties. Wouldn't piss off Arsenal fans too much since they have no real beef with Liverpool and he would have a field day threading passes into Suarez, Sturridge and Sterling. I can see Liverpool being genuine title contenders again with reinforcements in midfield and defense.
Arsenal aren't as good as Pool if last season is anything to go by. Arsenal compete for 4th while Pool mounted a title challenge. Plus they have the best player in the league and another striker who's scoring at an outrageous rate. Flexing isn't something arsenal do, I'm sure we all know that. He's been to arsenal and seen how things work there. Surely he'd be willing to try something new, at a club that seems on the up instead of a perennially stagnant one?Liverpool makes no sense for him when Arsenal are financially every bit as strong financially (far more if they want to flex), and as good a team too.
They probably think he's too deer.
Fabregas plays both as a 10 and as a central midfielder. He's also been previously played out wide and up top as a false 9 since joining barca. His versatility has never been an issue.
Fact is pool only have 1 no 10(coutinho) and he isn't pulling up no trees lately. In midfield they have bodies, but bodies don't help teams dominate leagues and compete in the CL, quality does. Outwide they have sterling(who seems on the verge of exploding) and coutinho has also played there. The midfielders aren't a patch on cesc either.
Any way you put it this:
------Sterling------Suarez------Sturrige-------
----------------------Fabregas------------------
---------------Gerrard-----Hendo-------------
Is better than
-----Lallana------suarez-------sturrige
--------------Coutinho/sterling------------
-----------------Gerrard-hendo------------
I'd argue that the 25million bid for Lallana shows you Pool aren't particularly cash strapped. Plus they can get rid of some of the squaddies to release funds for the cesc wage.
I'd believe it. The Guardian, The Times etc wouldn't all report it at the same time if it wasn't true.If it is true that he's beeing pushed out (I don't believe it), they shouldn't get anywhere near €35M
If it is true that he's beeing pushed out (I don't believe it), they shouldn't get anywhere near €35M
Strootman is injured, we can't even use him when the season starts, people seem to ignore that rather big issue. We'd probably have to wait until January to sign him.
If it is true that he's beeing pushed out (I don't believe it), they shouldn't get anywhere near €35M
I'd believe it. The Guardian, The Times etc wouldn't all report it at the same time if it wasn't true.
I don't think £28.5m is a lot of money for a player of his caliber, in fact, by recent standards it's probably a steal.
Unlikely. Those papers are reliable. Barca haven't exactly shot it down have they? Look at it this way, same thing happened when Fergie retired, Moyes got sacked, Mata wanted out. When all the reliable papers come out with the same story at the same time it's clearly briefing which has occured.Band wagon?
I think it would be clever to not go for Fabregas simply because I don't think we need him. It is better going for a box-to-box midfielder like Strootman instead of a big money signing like Fabregas.
I have heard that he has said he wants to play further forward. We need a central midfielder not an attack midfielder. If he is happy sitting deep then it could work.Eh? He was a near perfect all rounder midfielder during his tenure in the Premier League. Get him back to the level he was at with Arsenal and he would be the best midfielder in the league, hands down
Cowdenbeath...they need a bit of quality now they are staying up in the Scottish ChampionshipSo he has agreed terms with Man city, now Chelsea.
Who is next ? Tottenham ?
Cowdenbeath...they need a bit of quality now they are staying up in the Scottish Championship
BLUE BRAZIL!!!!
He changed his style of play and system dramatically this season tbf.Youre missing the point. They may very well be able to fit him in - but he isnt a winger, nor I suggest would he want to be deployed as one.
Your argument seems to be that they should buy a central midfielder instead of a winger because he's a better player. I'd suggest that gievn that they are targetting and making bids for a wide player then that's what they want. Rodgers plays a specific system and what he does works. I suspect Lallana has been targetted because he feels like he will fit that system. I suspect that he won't change his system just to fit a player in.
He might very well love to have Fabregas in his squad - but the pursuit of Lallana, given he evidently wants another wide player in his squad in order to compete on various fronts next year, is arguably irrelevant.
Something tells me Van Gaal may still go after him.It's Arsenal or Chelsea now I reckon.