bleezy
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2012
- Messages
- 1,115
A lot of teams are going to cross each other in 1980's Serie A here. I can't wait for the carnage it causes.
I rewatched Koeman specifically not long ago and albeit his passing range being second-to-none, if we speak strictly about the range of the passes he delivered, his accuracy in doing so was erratic at times. Not because his passing wasn't great, but he had complete freedom to try 60 yard passes at will even if it meant some lead to the opponent regaining the ball. After all the talk about us needing a great passer at United I think a more accurate description is that we want a technical defender as we'd never allow someone like Koeman to try those passes.
Cruyff as a trainer is in the opposite side of the spectrum when it comes to mad Dutch extremist tacticians. I also agree about Koeman, he's just a lost case in these drafts and I've also reached a point where I wouldn't be arsed to defend him if someone picked him.
For the link, it needs to be 15 games in the main league (Serie A, BPL, La Liga etc and/or the Champions League. No other leagues/cups).
Send me the write-ups please. Thanksfeckin' retard, that was my out to leave him alone! That's a string of three write-ups gone out of the window right there! He'd bettter have a good one
Sure @Joga Bonito would make an exception...as long as you don't divulge his strategy. We can work this out....
Send me the write-ups please. Thanks
Build a team around Schiaffino. Didn't pick him first. NiceYeah, right... My entire reason to join this was building a team around Schiaffino and merging the best of the Peñarol 1949 side and 60s sides. Of all the drafts, with all the rules there have ever been, this was the one where it was possible.
Thanks.
Build a team around Schiaffino. Didn't pick him first. Nice
The way this draft has gone so far we are better off scrapping it all and starting something over
Build a team around Schiaffino. Didn't pick him first. Nice
There are plenty of picks available for Rivaldo and he is one of the best modern day picks tbf, so I'm sure you won't be short of options @Stobzilla . Only problem might be working your way backwards to deal with the decade rule but there are a couple of glorious picks who would leave you plenty of options going backwards, and that's after hogging up some of the finest that the 90s-2000s have to offer.
Unfortunately it isn't funny, it's just sad.
Breitner actually offered an even more interesting path than Rummenigge in my opinion.
You can all feck off having a problem with the reset card now when I screamed my head off against it for days in advance. Additional nationality card my arse.
It's a fact that getting certain players requires getting stuck. It's not a matter of "playing your way out" with underwhelming picks, sometimes you will legitimately get stuck because there's no C who hasn't played with A.
What is important is that it isn't a pisstake, i.e.:
1) "Getting stuck" is clearly defined and has mitigating factors for anyone making it up: DONE
2) That the manager can't use it to teleport himself to a different decade/continent, i.e. ideally a player will be a natural continuation of the chain in place and be picked from the current team or the one right before (so long as they meet the Carrick/Hargreaves/Brown standard of "goodness", whatever that is... winning a CL and multiple league titles, it seems).
3) The manager makes a case for 1 or more players that a) do not teleport him, b) are of a similar underwhelming all-time standard as the aforementioned poor United servants, c) alllow him to continue the chain, d) player HAS to play in the first game.
4) A neutral (or committee) can still veto it so the guy clearly can't be taking the piss.
@Edgar Allan Pillow still hasn't confirmed 2-4 though.
I have to go in a while, is there anyone I can leave my pick with?
You can leave it with me if you like. You have 2 picks before I go again.
Choose a path not everyone will take and don't start sulking like little girls when it doesn't go your way. FFS.
You reckon going to Peñarol 40s and 60s was going to be popular? I had two paths there, one was blocked by Skizzo, the other by GS. Shit luck really.
I'm not sulking like a little girl, I'm lamenting the amount of time I am going to end up wasting on something I completely lost interest for. Which is precisely why I don't enter drafts any more.
Was referring more to Stob. Yours was tough luck, really.You reckon going to Peñarol 40s and 60s was going to be popular? I had two paths there, one was blocked by Skizzo, the other by GS. Shit luck really.
I'm not sulking like a little girl, I'm lamenting the amount of time I am going to end up wasting on something I completely lost interest for. Which is precisely why I don't enter drafts any more.
The way things are going, shouldn't this be viewed more as a self-inflicted sheep draft? i'm sure we've all started out with some grand ideas about chains, and they're already unravelling before our eyes. We've all complained about the super-teams that less restrictive drafts have ended up creating, so this is basically the opposite. Worst case scenario, we end up talking about some under-appreciated players in the match threads, laughing at the picks that have no place in an all-time draft, and hopefully not taking the voting too seriously.
What?Is @Edgar Allan Pillow around? We have another question to raise
Would you guys be OK if I gave @Stobzilla a restart, just to keep this running?
@Edgar Allan Pillow It's just been brought to my attention that during the 2 seasons at Fiorentina, Gentile and Baggio don't have the necessary number of league games. Can I pick again or am I going to be lumped with Titus Bramble?
Would you guys be OK if I gave @Stobzilla a restart, just to keep this running?
Ffs! Invalid pick. Go ahead and pick again.
Ffs! Invalid pick. Go ahead and pick again.