Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
Ah, I assumed rape would be the more serious charge, but how they worked out that its third degree rape is beyond me.
I'll still be shocked if he gets a heavy sentence.
Yea I expect it’ll be the minimum possible.
Ah, I assumed rape would be the more serious charge, but how they worked out that its third degree rape is beyond me.
I'll still be shocked if he gets a heavy sentence.
Will probably still run things from a cushy cell like a drug lord and be out in 3-4 years when no one speak about this anymore.
At least he’s not gonna rape anyone during that timeframe.
I get that they need to be there for a fairer trial. It's the lengths they go to to get them off and win, rather than simply provide their side of the story, that makes them dirtbags.Wow his attorney is a scumbag.
But she's just defending her client as is her job.
Nah, scumbag. Your client is a serial rapist and is lucky it's only 23 years.
Have to be honest, I've long had doubts about the adversarial style of courtroom justice.I get that they need to be there for a fairer trial. It's the lengths they go to to get them off and win, rather than simply provide their side of the story, that makes them dirtbags.
Wow his attorney is a scumbag.
But she's just defending her client as is her job.
Nah, scumbag. Your client is a serial rapist and is lucky it's only 23 years.
good enough for the cnut.
Feck you Weinstein and your legal team.
Imagine having the neck to ask for clemency due to his 'accomplishments'
Bob Weinstein said:U deserve a lifetime achievement award for the sheer savagery and immorality and inhumanness, for the acts u have perpetrated. Oh I forgot. They were all consensual. Then what are u in rehab for? Sex addiction. Don’t think so. You wouldn’t have harassment, assault and rape charges u have now received, from 82 women for active consensual sex.
What?
metoo was sadly found dead in a ditch with two bullets in the back of their head, police say they don't suspect foul playWhat?
Oh, I understand now.metoo was sadly found dead in a ditch with two bullets in the back of their head, police say they don't suspect foul play
Not suspicious whatsoever. Straight up assassinated.metoo was sadly found dead in a ditch with two bullets in the back of their head, police say they don't suspect foul play
Alyssa Milano, who started the movement by asking women to share their stories through #metoo, is the most notableWhich celebrities have done this?
how can we claim to believe victims when when both major political parties are rallying behind two openly creepy pervs who are credibly accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault?The reason we say 'believe victims' is to ensure that rape cases get the attention they deserve from the legal system. The conviction rate is so woefully low that this is the only way to get things are taken seriously.
But nobody should lose sight of the fact that the movement a corrective measure against institutionalised biases. It doesn't follow that every accused individual is guilty. This is not zero-sum situation. It's possible to give both parties the benefit of the doubt until the facts are clarified and the case is tried in a courtroom. To call Biden a rapist as a default reaction is stupid. Just as it's stupid to ignore Reade's claims without giving them due attention.
The problem with weaponising #metoo is that it does a disservice the movement itself. The point of it is to address the imbalances of the judicial system in order to produce fair outcomes. When you dismiss a victim report out-of-hand, that's potentially an injustice. But when you declare guilt without proving your case, that's equally so.
Those who think that #metoo gives them a right to call Biden a 'rapist' are only creating new systemic biases. It's trying curing a cancer with a different cancer.
This is exactly how I feel, and further the big risk to positive social change is those that abuse it - this just gives ammo to forces reliant on the institutionalized positions to begin with.The reason we say 'believe victims' is to ensure that rape cases get the attention they deserve from the legal system. The conviction rate is so woefully low that this is the only way to get things are taken seriously.
But nobody should lose sight of the fact that the movement a corrective measure against institutionalised biases. It doesn't follow that every accused individual is guilty. This is not zero-sum situation. It's possible to give both parties the benefit of the doubt until the facts are clarified and the case is tried in a courtroom. To call Biden a rapist as a default reaction is stupid. Just as it's stupid to ignore Reade's claims without giving them due attention.
The problem with weaponising #metoo is that it does a disservice the movement itself. The point of it is to address the imbalances of the judicial system in order to produce fair outcomes. When you dismiss a victim report out-of-hand, that's potentially an injustice. But when you declare guilt without proving your case, that's equally so.
Those who think that #metoo gives them a right to call Biden a 'rapist' are only creating new systemic biases. It's trying curing a cancer with a different cancer.
Not wanting to force you to engage your own brain, but did you watch the video? I did. Everyone should go watch it themselves - it's about a minute long. It directly confirms Reade's story from last year (about feeling harassed, not assulated). Her mother points out that Reade left a prominent Senator's office staff after being made to feel uncomfortable, and didn't want to go to the press with it out of respect for the Senator.
the biden circlejerk on reddit, this is the same subreddit that regularly upvoted accusations against Trump to their front page
dude stop it, just stop this shit, do you really expect her mother, in 1993, on CNN, to have gone into absolute details? tara went through a very trauamatic event with joe biden and it's really awful what you're doing to her, especially when you post things like this without understand why it was badNot wanting to force you to engage your own brain, but did you watch the video? I did. Everyone should go watch it themselves - it's about a minute long. It directly confirms Reade's story from last year (about feeling harassed, not assulated). Her mother points out that Reade left a prominent Senator's office staff after being made to feel uncomfortable, and didn't want to go to the press with it out of respect for the Senator.
Now, again, maybe you don't have kids. But if my daughter told me that her boss had raped her in an office, and I called into Larry King, that call is not how I would sound.
Also, good insight into sources there - note which ones choose to use the word assault. Literally at no point in that clip is the word mentioned or alluded to, or suggested in anyway. It's almost like you can tell which ones are shills for Trump.
I find his handling of the Anita Hill case obviously terrible - and he does too now.