Top answer.
edit: I predict Luke Shaw will get treatedsimilarlynext year. He's faster than Case but it doesn't make sense to keep him when he's injured all the time.
Give him a proposal. We give him half his salary until this summer if he leaves for free. Then we can spend those 150k a week on someone else and he can get new club and they can give him a bit less salary.
Having him on the bench week in and week out is just plan ridiculous. His third in the list of top earners in the premier league.
We doubled his salary from his prime days at Real Madrid.
https://www.capology.com/player/casemiro-33657/
It is understood his salary will be on a similar level to that of David de Gea, who has been reported to earn in excess of £350,000.
The Athletic understands Casemiro will receive a modest uplift if United qualify for the Champions League and his deal will be heavily incentivised and performance-related. While he stands to earn slightly more with United than Real, his earnings will drop significantly if Erik ten Hag’s side continue to miss out on Champions League football.
Who knows. We're not the only stupid club.I think you got this part right for sure. But there is no way we will find a buyer for Shaw.
£70m plus £375k in wages. How was that ever approved for a player in his 30s. Previous management were so incompetent.
This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
It's amazing to me that people can make this argument with a straight face given our recruitment history over the last decade.
It should be pretty clear to every Manchester United fan by now that signing big name player who has been very good in a different team in no way guarantees they'll be good in your team. And if you sign said player to a ludicrously inflated contract as he approaches the latter stages of his career, you're making yourself a hostage to fortune and drastically increasing the odds of a damaging misspend of resources. Especially when the transfer takes place in the context of to what all appearances is a haphazard, disorientated transfer window with little sign of a coherent underlying strategy.
This prospective deal is covered in red flags. And the fact that we've had to put up McFred for years doesn't change that. Just as the fact that they were replacing shit players didn't stop previous big-contract flops from being flops. If you're in a hole you don't keep digging in the same direction and this would be a transfer completely in line with the Woodward-era approach.
Not true. A lot of people pointed out the risks involved, and as usual they were shouted down by the transfer muppets.This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
idk, i from the beginning wasnt as high as some, and felt like there was a contingency that got shouted down any time they didnt bow to casemiro. From what i recall, he started bad, then hit a run of form, then finished bad again (as did everyone that season i believe). Thought the crescendo was the cup win, then pretty much back to shit form. From pretty early on it seemed like the pace was overall too much for him, and prob resulted in the numerous cards i thought he was getting/lunging in so much to tackles. Hard to remember though thru all the slog we've had lately.This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
idk i hope that if case, and rashford as well, are being unrealistic with themselves/moving on then they shouldnt be playing if they dont fit amorins system/plan. They want the paycheck, they can sit and watch the limited playing career that they have get wasted up.If he's still at the club after the window closes, he'll play again. Until then, this is standard practice with players you want to move where their salary/willingness to leave is the main stumbling block
Limited options means Case will likely still get the odd 10 minutes here, 20 there. Not much, but he'll play a bitidk i hope that if case, and rashford as well, are being unrealistic with themselves/moving on then they shouldnt be playing if they dont fit amorins system/plan. They want the paycheck, they can sit and watch the limited playing career that they have get wasted up.
I hope you're right. I worry you're wrong.If he's still at the club after the window closes, he'll play again. Until then, this is standard practice with players you want to move where their salary/willingness to leave is the main stumbling block
id say more likely that casemiro gets time than rashford for sure. At this point collyer has taken his minutes, and rightfully so. Barring injury id def want to see the minutes continued to be ugarte/mainoo/collyer trio. Obviously id like for another quality CM to be brought in, but at this point it is what it is.Limited options means Case will likely still get the odd 10 minutes here, 20 there. Not much, but he'll play a bit
Also his pedigree and good influence in the dressing room matter here
Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
Agreed, it was a dumb deal that was always going to be a problem, as Souness rightly called out at the time we would need to replace him within a year or so. He'd played a lot of football and was never the quickest, there was a reason RM were happy to see him go. A 2 year deal with a limited fee given his age would have been a good move. But the fee and wages always made it plain stupid. One of many bad signings but and not the worst just as we have the likes of Antony, Mount etc that eclipse itNothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.
The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.
Wonder if Ogden, Winter and Burt will leap to Casemiro's defence after that statement?
At least he is still a young 32 year old boy.Course they won't he's not English
He was only good for half of the season.This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
Sad thing is we had/have people just as clueless running the club.Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.
The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.
It's a predictable process that plays out over and over here.Sad thing is we had/have people just as clueless running the club.
Many of us were saying it was a terrible deal in his transfer thread (I've just been reading it) but were shot down by posters saying "who cares, it's not your money" and "pay whatever it takes its Casemiro!".
So frustrating that where we're at now financially was so easy to see coming.
His wife will share a insta story soon with his trophy cabinet
Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.
The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.
Nagelsmann was a head coach for Hoffeinheim even before hitting 30. It probably happened every week back than.We had two players (Casemiro and Eriksen) on the bench against Brighton who are older than their manager. Guess that has never happened before
It was beyond stupid to do the deal at anything near the money we paid. A cheap transfer to fill a role? Fine. But the actual deal was laughably awful.Makelele was 30 when Chelsea purchased him and he did very well for another 5 years. Casemiro was supposed to be our Makelele. 30 isn't definitely an age where top footballers lose their legs in the modern era. Even I had reservations at that time about the crazy price we paid but the first year changed my opinion. Overall, it's not Casemiro or Rashford or Garnacho or Hojlund or Zirkzee. There are so many things that were (are) wrong at the club that making players scapegoats is the easy argument. We are dysfunctional as a group. Hopefully we're setting that right under the new ownership.
This.It was beyond stupid to do the deal at anything near the money we paid. A cheap transfer to fill a role? Fine. But the actual deal was laughably awful.
Look at research on player age curves. There's tons out there. Most players peak at 25-26, and are declining swiftly by 30. Do some defy age curves for awhile longer? Yes, of course. But it's foolish to bet on this. Most players will be around the averages. No smart team would ever make a move like this on such big money.
For context, Casemiro is costing us at least 2x what Rashford does. ~350k a week in wages plus another ~15M a year in amortized transfer fee. And he can't even get in games as a sub ahead of Collyer. I think it's the worst transfer in our history (yes, worse than Antony, considerably), and that's saying something.
happy to stay put and collect $
happy to stay put and collect $
Because he´s 32 not 38, he should still have ambitions to be a starter - this just reeks of wanting to get paid for doing nothing.Or he's willing to accept that he's not good enough to start but can still offer something to the team when required maybe??
Why is everyone on here so damn cynical and willing to pour scorn on every player all the time?
How is leaving Man Utd for say a mid table Italian team or the Saudi league ambitious? Maybe someone who's always played for one of the biggest clubs in the country would much rather stay and try to contribute there rather than devolve into obscurity.Because he´s 32 not 38, he should still have ambitions to be a starter - this just reeks of wanting to get paid for doing nothing.
Or he's willing to accept that he's not good enough to start but can still offer something to the team when required maybe??
Why is everyone on here so damn cynical and willing to pour scorn on every player all the time?