Casemiro (out)

Top answer.

edit: I predict Luke Shaw will get treated similarly next year. He's faster than Case but it doesn't make sense to keep him when he's injured all the time.

I think you got this part right for sure. But there is no way we will find a buyer for Shaw.
 
Give him a proposal. We give him half his salary until this summer if he leaves for free. Then we can spend those 150k a week on someone else and he can get new club and they can give him a bit less salary.

Having him on the bench week in and week out is just plan ridiculous. His third in the list of top earners in the premier league.

We doubled his salary from his prime days at Real Madrid.

https://www.capology.com/player/casemiro-33657/

The Athletic reported when we signed Cas that he will get a slight raise if the club qualifies for CL, the below is the part about Cas wages in the article.

It is understood his salary will be on a similar level to that of David de Gea, who has been reported to earn in excess of £350,000.

The Athletic understands Casemiro will receive a modest uplift if United qualify for the Champions League and his deal will be heavily incentivised and performance-related. While he stands to earn slightly more with United than Real, his earnings will drop significantly if Erik ten Hag’s side continue to miss out on Champions League football.

I also remember reading that he was one of the top earners at Real when he signed a new contract a year before joining us, the contract was till 2025, and since Madrid got Tchouameni in 2022, they were, from a financial point of view, happy to allow Cas to go as they stood to gain savings of 3 years worth of wages.
 
£70m plus £375k in wages. How was that ever approved for a player in his 30s. Previous management were so incompetent.

This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
 
This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.

It's absolutely not. There were a lot of posters on here at the time who said it was a bad idea, let alone in the wider world.

For example, my first response to us being linked to Casemiro was:

It's amazing to me that people can make this argument with a straight face given our recruitment history over the last decade.

It should be pretty clear to every Manchester United fan by now that signing big name player who has been very good in a different team in no way guarantees they'll be good in your team. And if you sign said player to a ludicrously inflated contract as he approaches the latter stages of his career, you're making yourself a hostage to fortune and drastically increasing the odds of a damaging misspend of resources. Especially when the transfer takes place in the context of to what all appearances is a haphazard, disorientated transfer window with little sign of a coherent underlying strategy.

This prospective deal is covered in red flags. And the fact that we've had to put up McFred for years doesn't change that. Just as the fact that they were replacing shit players didn't stop previous big-contract flops from being flops. If you're in a hole you don't keep digging in the same direction and this would be a transfer completely in line with the Woodward-era approach.

And I was far from the only person making that argument.

But like always, once the club makes an obviously stupid decision people try to convince themeselves that it will be okay, me included. Unfortunately doesn't change how stupid the initial decision is though.

And in the case of Casemiro, it was one of the most ill-conceived transfers in the history of the club. Others have had worse impact, but few were such obvious on-paper bad ideas.
 
Last edited:
This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
Not true. A lot of people pointed out the risks involved, and as usual they were shouted down by the transfer muppets.
 
If he's still at the club after the window closes, he'll play again. Until then, this is standard practice with players you want to move where their salary/willingness to leave is the main stumbling block
 
This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
idk, i from the beginning wasnt as high as some, and felt like there was a contingency that got shouted down any time they didnt bow to casemiro. From what i recall, he started bad, then hit a run of form, then finished bad again (as did everyone that season i believe). Thought the crescendo was the cup win, then pretty much back to shit form. From pretty early on it seemed like the pace was overall too much for him, and prob resulted in the numerous cards i thought he was getting/lunging in so much to tackles. Hard to remember though thru all the slog we've had lately.
 
If he's still at the club after the window closes, he'll play again. Until then, this is standard practice with players you want to move where their salary/willingness to leave is the main stumbling block
idk i hope that if case, and rashford as well, are being unrealistic with themselves/moving on then they shouldnt be playing if they dont fit amorins system/plan. They want the paycheck, they can sit and watch the limited playing career that they have get wasted up.
 
Also Casemiro and Rashford have played loads of matches in the last two seasons…with them both playing big roles in the side United have finished 8th and 10th around the time of EtH sacking.

Amorim has nothing to gain by including them in the side.
 
idk i hope that if case, and rashford as well, are being unrealistic with themselves/moving on then they shouldnt be playing if they dont fit amorins system/plan. They want the paycheck, they can sit and watch the limited playing career that they have get wasted up.
Limited options means Case will likely still get the odd 10 minutes here, 20 there. Not much, but he'll play a bit

Also his pedigree and good influence in the dressing room matter here
 
If he's still at the club after the window closes, he'll play again. Until then, this is standard practice with players you want to move where their salary/willingness to leave is the main stumbling block
I hope you're right. I worry you're wrong.
I'm not sure were seeing the same version of casemiro you guys did. He's been here 2 and a half years, its enough to time for good habits to fall away.
 
Limited options means Case will likely still get the odd 10 minutes here, 20 there. Not much, but he'll play a bit

Also his pedigree and good influence in the dressing room matter here
id say more likely that casemiro gets time than rashford for sure. At this point collyer has taken his minutes, and rightfully so. Barring injury id def want to see the minutes continued to be ugarte/mainoo/collyer trio. Obviously id like for another quality CM to be brought in, but at this point it is what it is.
 
This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.

The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.
 
Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.

The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.
Agreed, it was a dumb deal that was always going to be a problem, as Souness rightly called out at the time we would need to replace him within a year or so. He'd played a lot of football and was never the quickest, there was a reason RM were happy to see him go. A 2 year deal with a limited fee given his age would have been a good move. But the fee and wages always made it plain stupid. One of many bad signings but and not the worst just as we have the likes of Antony, Mount etc that eclipse it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheimoon
This is so much of hindsight bias. During the first season, most fans were drooling over his performances and if it wasn't for Rodri, he had a good case to be in the PL team of the year. Of course, his performances dropped last year and this year, he's been terrible but that is more in line with everyone in the team overall.
He was only good for half of the season.

Should never have been signed for that much.
 
Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.

The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.
Sad thing is we had/have people just as clueless running the club.

Many of us were saying it was a terrible deal in his transfer thread (I've just been reading it) but were shot down by posters saying "who cares, it's not your money" and "pay whatever it takes its Casemiro!".

So frustrating that where we're at now financially was so easy to see coming.
 
Sad thing is we had/have people just as clueless running the club.

Many of us were saying it was a terrible deal in his transfer thread (I've just been reading it) but were shot down by posters saying "who cares, it's not your money" and "pay whatever it takes its Casemiro!".

So frustrating that where we're at now financially was so easy to see coming.
It's a predictable process that plays out over and over here.

1. Club makes last-minute panic moves in the transfer market
2. Small group of skeptics express concern about the player in question
3. Caf hivemind shoots down all criticism with the usual cliches: "trust the plan", "it's not my money", "pretty sure the club knows more than you about xyz", "stop moaning"
4. Within a year the skeptics' concerns pan out and the transfer is generally regarded as a flop
5. Any retrospective is dismissed as "hindsight bias"
 
Nothing hindsight about it. It was very clearly a poor move beforehand. Team shouldn't be targeting 30 year olds in the first place, let alone dropping £150M in wages and fees for the privilege. It was a disastrous process that led to a predictably horrible result.

The fact many fans praised it only shows how short-sighted most are, and why no one should ever let fans be in charge. You can bet we'd be right back in the hunt for more old, expensive, overpriced buys.

Makelele was 30 when Chelsea purchased him and he did very well for another 5 years. Casemiro was supposed to be our Makelele. 30 isn't definitely an age where top footballers lose their legs in the modern era. Even I had reservations at that time about the crazy price we paid but the first year changed my opinion. Overall, it's not Casemiro or Rashford or Garnacho or Hojlund or Zirkzee. There are so many things that were (are) wrong at the club that making players scapegoats is the easy argument. We are dysfunctional as a group. Hopefully we're setting that right under the new ownership.
 
Makelele was 30 when Chelsea purchased him and he did very well for another 5 years. Casemiro was supposed to be our Makelele. 30 isn't definitely an age where top footballers lose their legs in the modern era. Even I had reservations at that time about the crazy price we paid but the first year changed my opinion. Overall, it's not Casemiro or Rashford or Garnacho or Hojlund or Zirkzee. There are so many things that were (are) wrong at the club that making players scapegoats is the easy argument. We are dysfunctional as a group. Hopefully we're setting that right under the new ownership.
It was beyond stupid to do the deal at anything near the money we paid. A cheap transfer to fill a role? Fine. But the actual deal was laughably awful.

Look at research on player age curves. There's tons out there. Most players peak at 25-26, and are declining swiftly by 30. Do some defy age curves for awhile longer? Yes, of course. But it's foolish to bet on this. Most players will be around the averages. No smart team would ever make a move like this on such big money.

For context, Casemiro is costing us at least 2x what Rashford does. ~350k a week in wages plus another ~15M a year in amortized transfer fee. And he can't even get in games as a sub ahead of Collyer. I think it's the worst transfer in our history (yes, worse than Antony, considerably), and that's saying something.
 
It was beyond stupid to do the deal at anything near the money we paid. A cheap transfer to fill a role? Fine. But the actual deal was laughably awful.

Look at research on player age curves. There's tons out there. Most players peak at 25-26, and are declining swiftly by 30. Do some defy age curves for awhile longer? Yes, of course. But it's foolish to bet on this. Most players will be around the averages. No smart team would ever make a move like this on such big money.

For context, Casemiro is costing us at least 2x what Rashford does. ~350k a week in wages plus another ~15M a year in amortized transfer fee. And he can't even get in games as a sub ahead of Collyer. I think it's the worst transfer in our history (yes, worse than Antony, considerably), and that's saying something.
This.

The previous senior management team were really something. It says a lot that we've got two players in contention for the worst transfers ever still at the club at this point in time thanks to them (obviously one is on loan at present, but still).

I wonder what those morons were thinking. It wouldn't surprise me if it came out that they were boyhood fans of rival clubs and saw managing us as an opportunity to destroy us from within and get paid handsomely for it.
 
We will probably have to supplement at least £200k of his wages for him to go to Roma or equivalent - financially this is a disaster of a transfer that I can’t see us recouping anything on being stuck with for some time.

Unfortunately there are no Saudi noises so that horse may have bolted.
 
I like him as a player and a person but every time I think about him it just makes me remember how much needs to be done to our squad.
 


happy to stay put and collect $

Or he's willing to accept that he's not good enough to start but can still offer something to the team when required maybe??

Why is everyone on here so damn cynical and willing to pour scorn on every player all the time?
 
Or he's willing to accept that he's not good enough to start but can still offer something to the team when required maybe??

Why is everyone on here so damn cynical and willing to pour scorn on every player all the time?
Because he´s 32 not 38, he should still have ambitions to be a starter - this just reeks of wanting to get paid for doing nothing.
 
Because he´s 32 not 38, he should still have ambitions to be a starter - this just reeks of wanting to get paid for doing nothing.
How is leaving Man Utd for say a mid table Italian team or the Saudi league ambitious? Maybe someone who's always played for one of the biggest clubs in the country would much rather stay and try to contribute there rather than devolve into obscurity.

People want loyalty from players when they are good, but the moment they drop a level they want those players to vanish. It's not his fault we signed him for that money. He's doing nothing wrong and by all accounts a good influence to have around the place, one of the only genuine winners in the squad. Don't understand the criticism.
 
Or he's willing to accept that he's not good enough to start but can still offer something to the team when required maybe??

Why is everyone on here so damn cynical and willing to pour scorn on every player all the time?

He doesn't though, he's probably a 4th - 5th choice sub. His wages + ability literally hold us back. Not his fault and he's a professional but source of frustration nevertheless.