I don't think Hoeneß is an enemy to the club's continued growth. Let's not forget that the treble was still heavily influenced by some of his decisions, that were initially heavily criticised by the 'Hoeneß holds us back' voices, like his backing of the players against van Gaal and his heavy influence to kick him out while Rummenigge and Nerlinger back then defended van Gaal and tried to keep him as the coach. Followed by Hoeneß getting his wish to bring back his best friend Heynckes, which the same voices also called our downfall, predicting that he's an outdated coach who would destroy the positive development van Gaal had started.
Hoeneß shouldn't have too much power, actually he shouldn't be back in a position of power at all. But at times it feels (at least to me) as if his idiocy is still needed to keep the club a bit close to its identity and local fanbase.
I just wish we'd have a few former players, who weren't complete idiots whenever they open their mouth. With Kahn, there's of course all hope lost. But considering how much I dislike many of Lahm's postmatch interviews, I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be much better.
Despite the fact that I can't stand Lahm's post match interviews either I am convinced that he would be a very good director of football.
It's true that all Lahm ever says are empty phrases, but that just shows that he always has himself under control.
It never seems like he gets emotional or flustered after playing football, even after the most nerve-wracking of games.
He is always calm, collected and calculated. It's boring as hell for the fans and media, yeah - but the coach has to love it.
And I do think that being calm, calculated and rational is a very good quality for a director of football.
But the main part why I would love Lahm as a director of football is that his actions as a player speak for themselves.
He had goals for his career, always stuck to his principles and made the smart choice(s).
One of his "principles" is to go out on top and not play until the fans and club are sick of you, so they have to get rid of the formerly great player who can't let go.
He's also rutheless if he sees a chance to reach one of his goals/thinks one of his goals might be threatened or if someone goes against one of his principles/ideals/the way he thinks things should be done in football.
You can see this in the way he basically did the dirty work for Löw to get rid of Ballack before the 2010 World Cup.
Löw didn't have the cojones to just tell Ballack he's holding back the team after his unfortunate injury and it was time for the German team to move on from him to build a new team with the talented new generation of players.
So Lahm did what needed to be done and didn't shy away from "nasty" methods to get and keep what he wanted.
The result: He became and stayed the captain of the German national team - one of his goals for his career reached.
He also knows when to call it quits and make the smart, rational (football) decisions without letting emotions cloud his judgement.
So he called it quits after winning the world cup with the national team, is going to end his career as a player while he's still at the top of his game and didn't take the offer as director of football when his demands weren't met.
The last one has been very smart, too by the way.
Lahm saw the way Nerlinger was treated/never taken seriously ("Lehrlinger") as just the director of football.
He also saw how in contrast to that Sammer was taken seriously as director of football plus executive board member for Bayern.
The only logical conclusion form that is that you have to be an executive boarder member too, if you want to have a shot at implementing your ideas, in case they are not shared by the big two/three (Hoeneß, Rummenigge and Hopfner). Otherwise you'll just end up being their messenger boy.
All of that being said, I'm convinced that Lahm will return as a functionary for Bayern and it would be great to have Van Bommel at the club in another role, too.
As to Hoeneß - I just wish he would have stuck with his role as the "head of youth development".
Bayern could seriously use his expertise/experience in that area, as the results have been dire for the past couple of years since Alaba made it to the first team.
I also agree that having Hoeneß around in the role of the sage old master is beneficial for Bayern.
It's just that his word would always carry weight at Bayern no matter his position in the club and I didn't want him back in the day to day buisness controlling the whole club as an absolute monarch.