Crossie
Full Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2015
- Messages
- 4,929
- Supports
- vibrant attacking football
I admit I had totally forgotten on the 'loser' question, and totally subscribe to your opinion on the Kampl answer. I wrote and still find these polls 'interesting' because the anonymous nature of Kicker's voting system (similar to the player association's questionnaire) makes it more likely that players give their honest opinion. That's different when you look at awards where you can see who voted for whom.They're awful as well. It's so weird to ask the players who's the 'loser of the season'. Last season Kampl was third in that ranking behind Götze and Kruse. I still wonder what Kampl has done to piss off the other players in the league to vote for him, even though he clearly improved a lot compared to his season in Dortmund and was actually a pretty important player for Leverkusen with some excellent performances. I don't trust the players at all in these votings, they're all so sensitive and barely anyone votes honestly. Usually the opinion from the journalists is much better even though the quality of football journalism has declined so much (especially at kicker magazine), that it's best to ignore award season altogether.
Whether players' opinions are well-thought through or not is a very different animal but to me still more interesting to get their perception via an anonymous poll than journo opinions. If you ever have the chance to get seated within or close to the media section in your stadium and listen to journo conversations before, during and after the matches, or during several training sessions, go for it. It's worse than Sport1-Fantalk and Sky90 combined.
The quality of Kicker journos has become so incredibly poor that it's IMO not worthwhile spending a second on their player ratings and hence not their lists.
Last edited: