Bruno Fernandes image 8

Bruno Fernandes Portugal flag

2024-25 Performances


View full 2024-25 profile

5.7 Season Average Rating
Appearances
44
Goals
12
Assists
16
Yellow cards
9
Red cards
3
I disagree, I thought Ugarte as example was better over 90 mins. Heaven I thought was so good in time on pitch that, while I’d agree that is unusual to get MOTM for 60 mins, I’d would absolutely break protocol for performance there.

In your head it was clear choice, goes without saying.

Context though, he played well…great goal but third goal in 3-0 last minute. Messed up two counters for third before that.

Two assists? Only in paper. First was speculative pass that should be dealt with…ended with Hojlund, facing a defender running 30 yards, pushed wide scoring with great finish. This is only assist on paper as nobody else touched ball since Bruno. Did anyone think there was a good chance we would score from that pass, expect a goal? Second assist is even worse. Not even sure he touched it after playing the wrong pass initially and it coming back to him. If he did it was toe poke that ended up near Garnacho.
Possibly one of the worst posts on this thread, and there's been some shockers!

Quite easily a MoTM performance from Bruno last night, was a complete performance.
He didn't need to make the run he did for his goal, he could have just held his position and been lazy, but no, he wanted to score, to get the win and put the result beyond doubt.
 
Possibly one of the worst posts on this thread, and there's been some shockers!

Quite easily a MoTM performance from Bruno last night, was a complete performance.
He didn't need to make the run he did for his goal, he could have just held his position and been lazy, but no, he wanted to score, to get the win and put the result beyond doubt.

It's not even his worse post in this thread, in fact he set the bar from his very first post in the thread

How we doing with him? Guy has been consistent garbage three years straight. He has four or five Stan’s here for sure but majority see through him.
 
I disagree, I thought Ugarte as example was better over 90 mins. Heaven I thought was so good in time on pitch that, while I’d agree that is unusual to get MOTM for 60 mins, I’d would absolutely break protocol for performance there.

In your head it was clear choice, goes without saying.

Context though, he played well…great goal but third goal in 3-0 last minute. Messed up two counters for third before that.

Two assists? Only in paper. First was speculative pass that should be dealt with…ended with Hojlund, facing a defender running 30 yards, pushed wide scoring with great finish. This is only assist on paper as nobody else touched ball since Bruno. Did anyone think there was a good chance we would score from that pass, expect a goal? Second assist is even worse. Not even sure he touched it after playing the wrong pass initially and it coming back to him. If he did it was toe poke that ended up near Garnacho.

Tell me you dont like Bruno without telling me....

Still fans think as a creative midfielder, he should get every pass 100%. He messed up 2 counters so he cannot be MOTM.

Whilst you can diminish what he does and things like.. speculative pass.. when it actually wasn't. If you watch how the ball is played, the run, Bruno meant to pass the ball towards Hojlund. It wasn't a speculative clearance and Hojlund happened to be there....
 
It's not even his worse post in this thread, in fact he set the bar from his very first post in the thread

For a while I thought that he (?) was zaafi (rip) or Jeppers (rip). But not even they were that extreme. In any case, those 3 are definitely members of the Anti-Bruno Mount Rushmore. I guess NZT is the 4th? Not as extreme as the others, but he makes up for it with his impressive output.
 
If you win 3-0 and a player makes the first two and scores a brilliant goal himself then he's always going to be MOTM.

Anyone not giving it Bruno yesterday has an agenda against him.
 
I disagree, I thought Ugarte as example was better over 90 mins. Heaven I thought was so good in time on pitch that, while I’d agree that is unusual to get MOTM for 60 mins, I’d would absolutely break protocol for performance there.

In your head it was clear choice, goes without saying.

Context though, he played well…great goal but third goal in 3-0 last minute. Messed up two counters for third before that.

Two assists? Only in paper. First was speculative pass that should be dealt with…ended with Hojlund, facing a defender running 30 yards, pushed wide scoring with great finish. This is only assist on paper as nobody else touched ball since Bruno. Did anyone think there was a good chance we would score from that pass, expect a goal? Second assist is even worse. Not even sure he touched it after playing the wrong pass initially and it coming back to him. If he did it was toe poke that ended up near Garnacho.
For what reasons do you think ugarte was better last night?
 
Exactly. It’s setting Bruno up for failure to elevate him to such a comparison. Needlessly, too.

I think there's a case that even van Nistelrooy would hard to get into that 99' team starting XI.
Cole and York chemistry was just out of this world as partners.
 
The whole "would Player X with get into Team Z" discussion is kind of pointless. The second best player in history would technically not get into a team with the best player in history if they play the same position (yeah yeah, the manager would "make it work", I get it...)

It's more useful to discuss whether or not they would look out of place or whether or not they would have the needed quality to succeed. And in in the case of Bruno specifically the answer is obviously yes. He's better than a whole bunch of United players with 100-150 apps. Hell he's even better than some undisputed legends like G.Neville and Solskjær.
 
He is better than Yorke imo, though they're pretty different sorts of players.
I don’t think he’s close at all. The poster he quoted said he’d get in the 99 team. Yorke was a top 3 player in our 99 team so he obviously wouldn’t.

What everyone gets excited about Bruno doing while we are in the bottom half is what Yorke was doing in our treble winning side.

I believe he was 1st in goals and 2nd in assists. Think he got 29 and 22 G+A that season. He was world class and a big game player.

Maybe overall as a player he was better than Yorke (personally don’t agree) but the level Yorke hit in 99 would have any version of Bruno on the bench pretty easily.
 
I don’t think he’s close at all. The poster he quoted said he’d get in the 99 team. Yorke was a top 3 player in our 99 team so he obviously wouldn’t.

What everyone gets excited about Bruno doing while we are in the bottom half is what Yorke was doing in our treble winning side.

I believe he was 1st in goals and 2nd in assists. Think he got 29 and 22 G+A that season. He was world class and a big game player.

Maybe overall as a player he was better than Yorke (personally don’t agree) but the level Yorke hit in 99 would have any version of Bruno on the bench pretty easily.
I loved Dwight Yorke - and he was brilliant in that season. But that was an outlier in his career, he never came close to those heights before or after.

Comparing a striker with an attacking midfielder, which is now often asked to play at the beast of the midfield is not a good comparison.
 
This has always been my issue with Bruno Fernandes, especially in the United teams that he’s been a key player in over the last 4-5 years. He’s a moments player. Even in games where he’s scored and assisted, there are several times when he’s giving the ball away needlessly and contributing to our inability to control the game. It’s okay for forwards to play like that, not midfielders. If we classify him as a forward, then it’s all good. I’ve always felt midfield should be more about control. Perhaps if he was surrounded by players who could offer that control, then we could afford for him to go and do whatever he wants like he does now. But we haven’t been built like that.

Given how he sees and plays the game, his numbers will almost always look good, but I think overall the team will become a more cohesive unit once he isn’t a key player in it.
 
I don’t think he’s close at all. The poster he quoted said he’d get in the 99 team. Yorke was a top 3 player in our 99 team so he obviously wouldn’t.

What everyone gets excited about Bruno doing while we are in the bottom half is what Yorke was doing in our treble winning side.

I believe he was 1st in goals and 2nd in assists. Think he got 29 and 22 G+A that season. He was world class and a big game player.

Maybe overall as a player he was better than Yorke (personally don’t agree) but the level Yorke hit in 99 would have any version of Bruno on the bench pretty easily.
It's a flawed comparison for several reasons, chief among which are that they play different positions and also that Yorke was playing in a brilliantly coached, highly functional unit packed with top players. The part in bold is so strange to me...like Yorke's achievements were meant to be more impressive because he was surrounded by better players? Surely it's more difficult to put those numbers up in a dysfunctional team. Also, Yorke was nothing like as consistent as Bruno.
 
I don’t think he’s close at all. The poster he quoted said he’d get in the 99 team. Yorke was a top 3 player in our 99 team so he obviously wouldn’t.

What everyone gets excited about Bruno doing while we are in the bottom half is what Yorke was doing in our treble winning side.

I believe he was 1st in goals and 2nd in assists. Think he got 29 and 22 G+A that season. He was world class and a big game player.

Maybe overall as a player he was better than Yorke (personally don’t agree) but the level Yorke hit in 99 would have any version of Bruno on the bench pretty easily.
Didn't Dwight Yorke ask Fergie for a year off after winning the treble? That pales in comparison to Bruno's relentless winning mentality to want to play/win every game.
 
I agree with this. That being said, his finish for the goal was great and he still offered a very good performance in total. Whether thats MotM or not is personal decision at the end of the day and I wouldn't go into battle against somebody who thinks he was. I'll use the chance to state that I agree, he definitely takes a bit more care of the ball and doesn't seem too rushed in the last few games which is a good thing. Lets see if he can maintain that though, when the going gets a little tougher.
Yep…I think he played well, great goal. Thought Ugarte was better….heaven was exceptional
 
For what reasons do you think ugarte was better last night?
His performance from minute 1. Was at heart of breaking things up, keeping us in midfield battle that Eriksen seemed to keep wanting us to lose, tracking runners, big intervention, making runs himself to get forward, tidy on ball also. He and Heaven for me had biggest impact on us keeping foothold.

Bruno played well, scored great goal. I don’t have to agree that he was MOTM…this thread is like cult of Bruno.
 
His performance from minute 1. Was at heart of breaking things up, keeping us in midfield battle that Eriksen seemed to keep wanting us to lose, tracking runners, big intervention, making runs himself to get forward, tidy on ball also. He and Heaven for me had biggest impact on us keeping foothold.

Bruno played well, scored great goal. I don’t have to agree that he was MOTM…this thread is like cult of Bruno.

But he scored a goal and assisted, he would get man of the match as he was the difference. That’s not knocking Ugarte or Heaven’s performance. Heaven would have been close had he not been taken off injured.
 
It's not even his worse post in this thread, in fact he set the bar from his very first post in the thread
Reply to this…

“You can debate how well or how badly he played until you're blue in the face but we would be fecked without him.”

Feel free to actual debate points though. You think he performed well and the team has been good last three season?

I think he has spells of good form, not season. He is in good form now. What form was he in when that post?

I wouldn’t throw every other player under bus for Bruno. He is equally to blame as others.

Mazrouio, Deligt, Yorro, Heaven, Mainoo, Martinez, Bruno, Ugarte, Amad, Garnacho and probably others are all good enough to play in teams around top 5 in league. Yet we sit 14 all season and thank god for Bruno? I disagree. If he play like he play now all season maybe….but he has not. Six weeks of good form and he better than Beckham and Yorke who were…not just part of…but fundamental to us winning treble. Along with Keane they were the three top player of treble winners.

Thread is ridiculous. Cultist.
 
His performance from minute 1. Was at heart of breaking things up, keeping us in midfield battle that Eriksen seemed to keep wanting us to lose, tracking runners, big intervention, making runs himself to get forward, tidy on ball also. He and Heaven for me had biggest impact on us keeping foothold.

Bruno played well, scored great goal. I don’t have to agree that he was MOTM…this thread is like cult of Bruno.
Ugarte was the seventh highest performer according to the match day thread. Having him ahead of Bruno is borderline delusional. Heaven is a little more understandable (though still mad as he didn't play more than 1/3 of the game).

You're right you don't have to agree with anything, but when you chime in with mad opinions you can't be too surprised when people call them out as mad.