A rather odd and narrow definition of what makes a very good manager. I'd say turning around a squad that was laughed at by many (certainly here - a lot) and making them title challengers while playing some wonderful football is a far more significant. Improving players with a lot to prove has been his hallmark. I think the consensus is that he's done an excellent job at a behemoth of a club with a difficult recent history - no mean feat.
On the broader Rodgers v LvG debate that's emerged on here, it's a false dichotomy. One has been around for 20 odd years while the other is only just emerging. Of course LvG's record is impressive but does that mean it has to be thrown in Rodgers' face when he makes any point whatsoever about LvG or broader points about the league. It's a totally reductive and simplistic way of moving the debate forward. It's just point scoring. Rodgers is entitled to an opinion. To thrash about when he speaks comes across as defensive.
Heck, on here since April, Rodgers has gone from innovative, exciting manager to cliche-ridden imposter who dares to have an opinion.