Alex99
Rehab's Pete Doherty
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 17,374
what are you rolling your eyes for?
what are you rolling your eyes for?
Your comment.
I can't recall a single manager in a title race that's literally had only one tactic for an entire season.
I can't recall a single manager in a title race that's literally had only one tactic for an entire season.
Rodgers has got to be the most tactically inept manager to ever be involved in a title challenge.
Kevin Keegan says hi.
I can't recall you being someone so prone to hyperbole. Shame.
Kevin Keegan says hi.
This is genuine. They've played the same way all year, and when it's not worked, they've been completely unable to do anything about it every single time. He's been heralded as some sort of genius, yet his Plan A is "score loads in the first half", with absolutely no care given on how to see out a match, or any form of Plan B in sight when Plan A doesn't work. Tonight was an extreme example, but all season they've relied on first-half/first hour leads to see them through matches. They've 'lost' a staggering number of second halves this season, especially when compared to City and Chelsea. He's done a great job putting them where they are, but he's still looked clueless tactically.
Obviously I'm being slightly hyperbolic, I just think people have brushed a lot under the rug this season regarding his tactics because they've played entertaining football. Until tonight, there's been very little criticism of the fact that they tend to burn out after about an hour, and that their defense has looked shoddy all season. Had they nicked a 4th tonight, it might have been the same story again.
To be fair, I was about 4 when he was around.
How do you think they have sustained a title challenge with 1) a squad clearly worse than every one of their rivals and 2) the most tactically inept manager to ever be involved in a title challenge
I haven't seen the highlights.
Once the score went 3-1, they should have shut the gates, called everyone back. Hindsight is 20/20 though.
Because the tactic has worked for a lot of the season. However, once people suss it out, they fall apart. That's what's happened over the last few games, and it's finally cost them. They also wouldn't have been able to play as they have all season had they been in either European competition because their players wouldn't have had the energy to do it twice a week.
They nearly ballsed it up against City and got saved by a lucky winner. They did balls it up against Chelsea. They nearly ballsed it up against Norwich, and they ballsed it up again tonight. There was no good reason to play like they have been against Chelsea, yet they did and it cost them because of all the space they leave. There was no good reason for them to keep playing like they have been once Palace pulled one back, but they did. When required, Rodgers has been too afraid or too clueless to try anything else because he only knows one way to make Liverpool play.
They've scored 99 goals this season, with 75 of them coming in the first hour. They've conceded 49; 37 in the last hour, 29 in the second half, and 21 in the final half hour. They rely on scoring enough early for the ones they concede late not costing them the game. Their whole game plan is literally one massive gamble on scoring early. When they don't score early, they generally don't win.
As I said, tonight was an extreme example showing up the tactic. They went shit or bust for the first hour and got themselves 3-0 up. Because Rodgers had them stupidly believing that they could make up the goal difference, they carried on trying to play that way. I can sort of understand that because had they managed to grab a couple more, the goal difference thing was actually looking slightly possible. However, it was monumental stupidity that saw them stay that way until the 2nd goal went in.
Whether Liverpool win the league or not, Brendan Rodgers has done a great job. Great coaching to have improved a team that was a laughing stock under Kenny dalglish so much and he has handled suarez very well.
True, these are things all the best managers can do. Even guardiola for all the criticism of his tactics did those things regularly at Barcelona in away matches that were tight.Definitely. He's had them playing far beyond what they should be and it's quite admirable, if not for their fanbase's arrogance despite having won absolutely nothing yet. He's still got things to learn though. How to shut out a game, how to play more than one style of football, when to go ugly football...
True, these are things all the best managers can do. Even guardiola for all the criticism of his tactics did those things regularly at Barcelona in away matches that were tight.
It's better than Norwich's tactic of "only concede one handful of goals".You can't really claim his tactic was to score lots of goals in the first half. There's a lot more to it than that.
They needed to batter palace if they were going to stand any chance of winning the title and palace scored because of that. You can't really blame him for that. What's the point of winning 3-0 when you really need 8?
Against chelsea, yes he shouldve played for the draw. Oit wouldve taken chelsea out of their comfort area and made them chase the game in which then pool couldve destroyed them on the counter.
What happened over the last two games was 1) Gerrard slipped and Mourniho parked the bus 2) They pressed on up 3-0 trying to boost their goal differential and got caught out. It really has nothing to do with some failing of his tactics.
1) Worked because they had no plan b
2) Trying to catch the goal difference was a silly naive thing to do and it bit them in the arse. The have been leaky at the back all season.
So I'd say Alex makes a decent point.
He's an inexperienced manager compared to most other managers in the league. He won't make this mistake again (unless he's been brainwashed completely by Liverpool).
Because the tactic has worked for a lot of the season. However, once people suss it out, they fall apart. That's what's happened over the last few games, and it's finally cost them. They also wouldn't have been able to play as they have all season had they been in either European competition because their players wouldn't have had the energy to do it twice a week.
They nearly ballsed it up against City and got saved by a lucky winner. They did balls it up against Chelsea. They nearly ballsed it up against Norwich, and they ballsed it up again tonight. There was no good reason to play like they have been against Chelsea, yet they did and it cost them because of all the space they leave. There was no good reason for them to keep playing like they have been once Palace pulled one back, but they did. When required, Rodgers has been too afraid or too clueless to try anything else because he only knows one way to make Liverpool play.
They've scored 99 goals this season, with 75 of them coming in the first hour. They've conceded 49; 37 in the last hour, 29 in the second half, and 21 in the final half hour. They rely on scoring enough early for the ones they concede late not costing them the game. Their whole game plan is literally one massive gamble on scoring early. When they don't score early, they generally don't win.
As I said, tonight was an extreme example showing up the tactic. They went shit or bust for the first hour and got themselves 3-0 up. Because Rodgers had them stupidly believing that they could make up the goal difference, they carried on trying to play that way. I can sort of understand that because had they managed to grab a couple more, the goal difference thing was actually looking slightly possible. However, it was monumental stupidity that saw them stay that way until the 2nd goal went in.
I don't think he's going to get this opportunity of fighting for titles again.
We will get our act together. Chelsea and City will be stronger next year.
Both of those statements are undoubtably true. But they aren't the point that I thought we were discussing. Saying Rodgers is "the most tactically inept manager ever to be involved in a title race" could only be true if he had far and away the best team and stumbled to a disappointing finish. Instead he has taken a team no one expected much of and has them finishing, at worst, in second place. You don't accomplish that by being the most tactically inept manager ever to be involved in a title race. Obviously Rodgers has made mistakes but I think Alex is being way over the top.
Well, that depends on how they buy. They have a more established first 11 than us. If they purchase a couple of good players, I can see them building to another title challenge next year.I don't think he's going to get this opportunity of fighting for titles again.
We will get our act together. Chelsea and City will be stronger next year.
Rodgers has done an excellent job, he deserves a lot of credit for Liverpool's season. He was a couple of results away from the title with a decent to good Liverpool squad. Criticism of him now is bizarre.
Well, that depends on how they buy. They have a more established first 11 than us. If they purchase a couple of good players, I can see them building to another title challenge next year.
You cannot overlook the advantage having no Europe gave them. Also being out of the other cups quite early.
And again, some pretty good luck with availability of their top players, Suarez's 6match ban at the start withstanding.
Well, that depends on how they buy. They have a more established first 11 than us. If they purchase a couple of good players, I can see them building to another title challenge next year.
he will learn. think they have finally got themselves a decent manager. Talk he wants to bring in up to 6 players. They will have more games too. They are back alright.
They've looked rubbish in the second half of the match for the third consecutive match. Having no Europe helped them immensely and I suspect that's why we saw some this high energy attacking game from Liverpool. I'm not saying that they'll suddenly turn rubbish this season but they won't be able to carry this high tempo attacking game for next season.