- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 62,851
Christ, I'd only have signed two of those at most. And one of them was free...
In the last two years they have spent just over over 154mil and have had no really improvement in terms of league position.
Signings since Jan 2011
Fabio Borini £10,000,000
Joe Allen £15,000,000
Oussama Assaidi £2,300,000
Samed Yesil £1,000,000
Daniel Sturridge £12,000,000
Jordan Henderson £16,000,000
Charlie Adam £7,000,000
Doni Free
Stewart Downing £20,000,000
Sanchez Jose Enrique £6,300,000
Sebastian Coates £7,000,000
Craig Bellamy Free
Luis Suarez £23,000,000
Andrew Carroll £35,000,000
Dalglish and Comolis transfer policy was reckless and ridiculous.
This would have him sacked after a while. Like dropping Terry in one swoop you would have lost the crowd and the dressing room.
I just don't see what team needs the baggage that comes with Suarez.
Madrid and Barca don't need him, I don't think the Italian teams (maybe Juve who are signing Llorente) can afford him and I don't think the like of PSG need him.
Where would he go?
I'm convinced there must be something more to Liverpool's transfer policy than merely the managers, since there is just such an incredibly scatter gun approach to everything.
What's so strange about them is that they never pick up a bargain, which leads you to believe their scouting network outside of the UK is atrocious. Michu, Cabaye, Ben Arfa, even Cazorla were all easily within their budget, yet they all went to other clubs.
In addition to those failings, they have this bizarre notion of wanting to buy exclusively British players, but never the best ones. Take the £12m signing of Sturridge as an example. You could spend that on Zaha who by all accounts has a much higher ceiling. They want to sign Tom Ince who is also inferior to Zaha. It's baffling. Very few clubs have a seemingly deliberate policy of signing second rate players when better ones are available for similar fees.
Christ, I'd only have signed two of those at most. And one of them was free...
In addition to those failings, they have this bizarre notion of wanting to buy exclusively British players, but never the best ones. Take the £12m signing of Sturridge as an example. You could spend that on Zaha who by all accounts has a much higher ceiling. They want to sign Tom Ince who is also inferior to Zaha. It's baffling. Very few clubs have a seemingly deliberate policy of signing second rate players when better ones are available for similar fees.
I'm struggling to see two I'd want at United, Suarez based on football ability alone though I'd still say no due to him being a dick.
In the last two years they have spent just over over 154mil and have had no really improvement in terms of league position.
Signings since Jan 2011
Fabio Borini £10,000,000
Joe Allen £15,000,000
Oussama Assaidi £2,300,000
Samed Yesil £1,000,000
Daniel Sturridge £12,000,000
Jordan Henderson £16,000,000
Charlie Adam £7,000,000
Doni Free
Stewart Downing £20,000,000
Sanchez Jose Enrique £6,300,000
Sebastian Coates £7,000,000
Craig Bellamy Free
Luis Suarez £23,000,000
Andrew Carroll £35,000,000
Vegard Forren looks to be their next signing.
The one I like is Sturridge & Borini total £22mil....RVP cost what, £24mil?
The one I like is Sturridge & Borini total £22mil....RVP cost what, £24mil?
Yeah but to be fair, what wages are they on and what is RVP on? I'd argue the pair of them don't make up RVP's weekly wage.
Top British players/talents would rather go to United. They were in for Young and Jones for example.
Even City, Chelsea and Arse are more favorable. We guarantee UCL football, better pays and trophies. Well not trophies in Arsenals case. Spuds have beaten them to a few targets too.
Also the best players from foreign leagues will hardly be excited at joining the 8th best team in England. Suarez aside.
Liverpool are competing for 2nd and 3rd tier players unless they get back in the UCL or do a City and get bought by a rich Sheikh.
Liverpool are historically a big club but players want to win things and want a big payday. Present day Liverpool offer none of those.
I personally think for £18m and £17m respectively, they probably dodged a bullet with Young and Jones, since neither of them seem to be worth those sums. That's not to say they're bad players, but I don't think either would have significantly improved Liverpool.
They are still an attractive club for the simple reason that they still offer good money to players. Indeed, it's tough for them to be competing at the very highest level of the transfer market, but there's no reason why they can't attract talent from the Championship. Yes, they might get gazumped occasionally, but all too often they're not even in for the player to get beaten to him.
You'd have thought that the signing of Suarez would give them an idea of what they need to do. Sign one good player as opposed to two average ones. £22m on him will probably prove to be one of the best moves in the transfer market this decade since you can't see him leaving for much less than £35m, if he leaves at all.
In the last two years they have spent just over over 154mil and have had no really improvement in terms of league position.
I completely disagree re Young and Jones, they would both significantly improve Liverpool. Young was on course for mom in my view yesterday until he got injured and is a much better winger than anything they have (Stirling was out of his depth yesterday) and Downing is ....... Well, just shit.
Jones has been injured and there is no reason why he won't recapture the form he had before injury when he was very, very effective. He's also very young and will be a united and England regular for years to come.
It's something Liverpool have to do at some point if they wanna take themselves forward.Gerrard is like a dead weight these days.Rodgers is a pussy
Yet they portray themselves as paupers. Much easier to pretend you don't have the resources than to admit your managers(s) have failed in spectacular fashion.
154m gone would suggest that we are now not quite as well off as we were.
You think he is way forward and is doing a good job, Stick?
Obviously they're better than what they have, but I don't see them two currently moving them from 9th to 4th, which was the point really.
What two players in that price range would take them from 9th to 4th. Not signing them is hardly dodging a bullet.
I think he can take Liverpool forward over the next 4 years to again challenge for a champions league spot. I wasnt happy with yesterdays showing. To be honest it lacked heart and a lot of quality but if we're realistic we could never expect to get much from OT with a couple of young lads in the team and a disjointed midfield. I think he certainly has his work cut out for him to get rid of some poor players which other managers paid over the odds for but I've been happy with some performances this year. I dont know if other liverpool fans will remain patient with him. He is singing the right tune but his inexperience may go against him. I could see him paying the price of taking the hard decisions at a club that needs to stop living in the past and develop the future.
I think he has made poor decisions with signings, letting players go and building the confidence of the ones already there. Sahin and Allen haven't turned out be very smart signings, the verdict is out on Borini and 'Ridges is a drunk assassin. Carroll was let go on loan before getting another striker. Even if he signed Dempsey, I don't know how he would have fit Rodgers "style of football". I don't think he has been very smart in handling Downing either. It wasn't very smart telling him that he was unwanted, worse start him at OT.
He is playing the tunes to appease the masses but hasn't actually done anything to improve Liverpool from last year yet. Hendo, Gerrard, Lucas, Shelvey - I don't know how they are going to fit in with his style. The young players are decent but I haven't seen any massive talent amongst them. Most of all, I think he is trying to fit square pegs in round holes instead of trying to play to his teams strength. I feel he may be out of his depth here.
He'll fit right in. They profess to love Forreners.
I personally think for £18m and £17m respectively, they probably dodged a bullet with Young and Jones, since neither of them seem to be worth those sums. That's not to say they're bad players, but I don't think either would have significantly improved Liverpool.
It's a bit strange the way you put Rodgers "Style of football," in inverted commas and then state players that you feel wont fit in with his style. Rodgers style will be get his team winning. He got his players to play triangles a bit at Swansea but at all levels of football this is a useful way at retaining the ball and not a Rodgers innovation as some would have you believe.
Oh my God, I didn't realise Downing cost £20m!In the last two years they have spent just over over 154mil and have had no really improvement in terms of league position.
Signings since Jan 2011
Fabio Borini £10,000,000
Joe Allen £15,000,000
Oussama Assaidi £2,300,000
Samed Yesil £1,000,000
Daniel Sturridge £12,000,000
Jordan Henderson £16,000,000
Charlie Adam £7,000,000
Doni Free
Stewart Downing £20,000,000
Sanchez Jose Enrique £6,300,000
Sebastian Coates £7,000,000
Craig Bellamy Free
Luis Suarez £23,000,000
Andrew Carroll £35,000,000
In the last two years they have spent just over over 154mil and have had no really improvement in terms of league position.
Signings since Jan 2011
Fabio Borini £10,000,000 = Didn't look up to much before his injury.
Joe Allen £15,000,000 = Knock £10 million off the price tag and it wouldn't look too bad.
Oussama Assaidi £2,300,000 Has he even played?
Samed Yesil £1,000,000 = Supposed to an exciting prospect, but I've only read that and it was Liverpool fans saying it so who knows?
Daniel Sturridge £12,000,000 = Could be good, could be bad. Too early to say.
Jordan Henderson £16,000,000 = The invisible man.
Charlie Adam £7,000,000 = Waste of space.
Doni Free = Who?
Stewart Downing £20,000,000 = Absolute disaster.
Sanchez Jose Enrique £6,300,000 = Started off well, then tailed off, then picked up a bit. Okay.
Sebastian Coates £7,000,000 = There was talk of him going out on loan last week. He's young though so I wouldn't write him off yet.
Craig Bellamy Free = He was decent for them.
Luis Suarez £23,000,000 = Brilliant player.
Andrew Carroll £35,000,000 = Christ almighty....
How much did Chelsea make out of Sturridge? Can't believe they actually made a profit out of a player for once.
The Professional Football Compensation Committee decided on 14 January 2010 that Chelsea would pay an initial fee of £3.5 million, with additional payments of £500,000 after each of 10, 20, 30 and 40 first-team competitive appearances. There would also be a further payment of £1 million if Sturridge made a full international appearance, and Manchester City in addition would receive 15 percent of any sell-on fee if Sturridge was transferred