Carl
has permanently erect nipples
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 45,858
Based on what? Genuine question.
Definitely not football manager or Youtube clips. Definitely.
Based on what? Genuine question.
Surely the "raw" anology means like having all the ingredient/attributes, but they haven't been cooked/developed yet. Embolo doesn't look like he has the ingredients to be a great player.
Coman?
I did as well, wasn't until they came back after halftime and said it was him.I keep thinking that's Lawro
Martial / Rashford level at that age is not too much to hope forYou lot are nuts, the pitch is awful and he's against a very physical French team. Sure he's not perfect but he's clearly very talented.
Swear some of you expect them to be ronaldo level at 18/19
No use judging him based on this tournament. Greizmann for instance looks completely lost
Let him stay there for next season, so we can all have a look at him again.Not sure many people follow the Swiss league TBF. Better to judge him in actual live football matches than anything else. Surely?
Let him stay there for next season, so we can all have a look at him again.
Not sure many people follow the Swiss league TBF. Better to judge him in actual live football matches than anything else. Surely?
I'm sure our scouts know all they need to know already tbf.
Yes but we can't draw a lot of conclusions from this imo.
Across the 3 games he's showed he's got great vision and good physical attributes. Hasn't really had any clear Scoring chances, but he's worked very hard and never hidden. Yes he could have done better but I can see why he's highly rated. Shakiri did sod all but he's an established player, you've got to look passed this game really.Based on what? Genuine question.
he was nonexistent in the second half but decent in the first oneI thought coman was the worst of the lot and I really rate him.
Still looks no worse than the mighty Zlatan in the Euros
I just don't see it. Granted I've seen nowhere near enough of him to form an opinion.Across the 3 games he's showed he's got great vision and good physical attributes. Hasn't really had any clear Scoring chances, but he's worked very hard and never hidden. Yes he could have done better but I can see why he's highly rated. Shakiri did sod all but he's an established player, you've got to look passed this game really.
Anyway just my opinion, we shall see how he improves.
Across the 3 games he's showed he's got great vision and good physical attributes. Hasn't really had any clear Scoring chances, but he's worked very hard and never hidden. Yes he could have done better but I can see why he's highly rated. Shakiri did sod all but he's an established player, you've got to look passed this game really.
Anyway just my opinion, we shall see how he improves.
He's 19 years old ffs. I'm sure he would apologise for not banging in 40 yard screamers and fancy flicks for you.
What about the fact that he turned 19 this year and already has 30 senior goals to his name, does that scream average too?
The fact he is 19 and that seems to mean nothing to you screams to me that you are a poor judge of talent.
You don't learn first touch, how to dribble etc after 19 so yes i'll stick by my opinion. Thank you
You do that, super scout.
I'm a fan of his, but he didn't play well this game. Still posted some good stats though
This is the first game that he started and he is yet to play full 90 minutes at the tournament, they are not depending on himBig tournament and Switzerland basing almost their entire offensive game on this teenager
They clearly are more than England on Rashford.This is the first game that he started and he is yet to play full 90 minutes at the tournament, they are not depending on him
That shows how stats are misleading, he crossed twice both poor crosses nowhere near their players, the shot was in the first half blocked by Koshielny(spell?) and out for a corner.
I posted my thoughts about 15 pages back and was ridiculed. I'll reiterate:
Nothing suggests that he's going to be a great player. He has poor control, poor dribbling and is weak overall technically - no matter what the age.
You can not improve basic attributes by much at this age.
I really hope we're not in for this guy. Even Depay and Lingard are much, much better.
After someone just posted 'good stats'of his from tonight's games,and having seen his performance,I wouldn't be that quick to jump on those stats as gospel.Not going to panic. I doubt he became a Swiss regular as a teenager and one of the most highly rated young players in Europe by accident. Have not really been able to watch him but, his stats in the Europa League last season shows that he is an impressive dribbler which we could really use on the right wing.
Saying you can't improve your dribbling after 19 really isn't true, it's just most have already learnt how to do it effectively. He's clearly been very quick and strong from a young age, he's probably not had to learn how to dribble with agility yet.I posted my thoughts about 15 pages back and was ridiculed. I'll reiterate:
Nothing suggests that he's going to be a great player. He has poor control, poor dribbling and is weak overall technically - no matter what the age.
You can not improve basic attributes by much at this age.
I really hope we're not in for this guy. Even Depay and Lingard are much, much better.