TheReligion
Abusive
Neanderthals...kicking objects to each other and then writing down the rules for association football?
Yes Spoons!
Neanderthals...kicking objects to each other and then writing down the rules for association football?
That's very true especially in a forum where in the general section there are threads that openly mock religion citing prejudice views with an acceptance.
We're not clutching at straws. City are constantly drooled over with very little caveat and I'll try find the article that said Mansour has half the sports journalists charmed like little schoolboys. You simply can't perpetuate the celebration of city - a team built on just the same level of corruption, murder and abhorrent human rights - and then expect people to be unanimously outraged by Qatar. One was a gateway for the other
Just read about the land deals the guy has been allowed to waltz into in Manchester. Barely a peep about them just a cultish fawning about guardiola - who will happily lecture us on other political issues
The all round hypocrisy is rank
Boycott man city? Off to Abu Dhabi for December where pep will smile and bend the knee for his masters again. Migrant worker deaths, lgbt rights, broad human rights abuses - they all exist there and City are used to try legitimise the place, and manager happy to smile along. But the reaction to raising this obvious hypocrisy and similarity is often defensive from all quarters - proof that sportswashing works
Which countries and which invasions?
How far back are we going, for instance should Italy not be considered as a potential host in the future because of the Roman Empires invasion of Parthia? Or should it just be more recent invasions like the US in Iraq? (Qatar took part in the 1st Gulf war)
And if it's only the latter then how long after an invasion can a country be considered again?
Should I boycott India, Nepal, and Bangladesh too? I mean, those countries must be poorly run and offer their citizens little chance of success in life if those citizens are desperate enough to go abroad and work in Qatar.
The US is still in Syria. The Turks are there too. No one creates a fuss about it. The Israelis are occupying part of Palestine against all UN resolutions. No one calls for their ban from FIFA or any other sports. This is now.
You give or don't give your money or support to who you like. The issue in this thread has become not that, it's people saying it's morally wrong to take a moral stand. It's a real Joseph Heller humdinger.
I have done most of my protesting against the US but it has feck to do with standing up for the LGBT community in Qatar.
I have been arrested in solidarity with Palestine. But so what? Anyone who really cares wouldnt let any of the whataboutery in this thread stand in the way of help, no matter how small or symbolic.
There are human rights abuses now in Qatar where the glare of the world is. A perfect time to highlight it.
No they don't. They are saying it's morally wrong to be selective in their stance. Russia is being rightly boycotted because of their illegal invasion. Other countries are not boycotted because of their illegal occupation. In fact it may be illegal to boycott their illegal occupation.
As an individual yes you should. Nothing much you can do about it too I accept. What gets me is associations and countries who are being hypocrites.
Is there hypocrisy in the world? yes, everywhere. To use it as an excuse not to stand up for the oppressed is weak and cowardly.
Also, read David Conn and Philipe Auclair. They do great work on the evils of the game.
That's not what I'm using it as an excuse for. I'm saying that its the cause of complacency. For ten years we've had whataboutism and mental gymnastics to defend city, or full silence by people now condemning Qatar.
Only city fans and Sky Sports, defend City. We all fecking hate them and PSG and Newcastle.
I think we're on the same page about Qatar etc but I disagree on city. I've never seen so many United fans willing to separate sport from reality with such passion as when getting giddy for city. On this site and in real life. As for the likes of Lineker and other pious personalities. Not a whisper. They're to guardiola what teenage girls are to harry styles.
No, but thanks for jogging my memory about it.Anyone seen the fifa uncovered documentary on Netflix?
The US is still in Syria. The Turks are there too. No one creates a fuss about it. The Israelis are occupying part of Palestine against all UN resolutions.
No one calls for their ban from FIFA or any other sports. This is now.
That's not what I'm using it as an excuse for. I'm saying that its the cause of complacency. For ten years we've had whataboutism and mental gymnastics to defend city, or full silence by people now condemning Qatar.
Have we been frequenting the same forum for the last 10 years?I think we're on the same page about Qatar etc but I disagree on city. I've never seen so many United fans willing to separate sport from reality with such passion as when getting giddy for city. On this site and in real life. As for the likes of Lineker and other pious personalities. Not a whisper. They're to guardiola what teenage girls are to harry styles.
For ten years we've had whataboutism and mental gymnastics to defend city, or full silence by people now condemning Qatar.
Great post. I think you have perfectly identified the hypocrisy of the English media, in the pocket of Abu Dhabi and now Saudi Arabia too.We're not clutching at straws. City are constantly drooled over with very little caveat and I'll try find the article that said Mansour has half the sports journalists charmed like little schoolboys. You simply can't perpetuate the celebration of city - a team built on just the same level of corruption, murder and abhorrent human rights - and then expect people to be unanimously outraged by Qatar. One was a gateway for the other
Just read about the land deals the guy has been allowed to waltz into in Manchester. Barely a peep about them just a cultish fawning about guardiola - who will happily lecture us on other political issues
The all round hypocrisy is rank
He's referring to the migrant workers who died building the stadiums.
Do you mean that migrant workers didn't die during the building of the stadiums?It's pretty obviously untrue though isn't it.
It's pretty obviously untrue though isn't it.
So the recent economic downturn won’t affect the WC that badly?Not sure if others are similar but couldn't care less about the politics of it. It's a world cup, it comes around once every four years, I'm excited as ever and will watch a ton of games, and I barely watch any league games currently as it is.
Great post. I think you have perfectly identified the hypocrisy of the English media, in the pocket of Abu Dhabi and now Saudi Arabia too.
But also, feck the Qatar WC. From the appalling human rights abuses that went into building the tournament to the abhorrent discourse on the LGBTQ+ community that has occurred thus far, i will personally be boycotting it insofar as i will not watch. I'm almost at that point with the premier league too.
It's pretty obviously untrue though isn't it.
All because of a fairy tale…
There has been more awareness, media pieces and pushback from the media with respect to Qatar than there has been towards Manchester City, from what I've observed, perhaps because of that exact dynamic you just described (i bolded it).There is definitely hypocrisy in the media, in all media, sadly. But they are literally bending to to the will of advertisers or governments. That's a whole other unrelated conversation because they are not leading the calls for a boycott. Or even joining in a little bit.
The US are in Syria as are many countries. I'm not defending any of that just trying to find out what the criteria is here.
Are Turkey or Israel hosting the World Cup any time soon?
Is anyone calling for Qatar to be banned from Football?
There has been more awareness, media pieces and pushback from the media with respect to Qatar than there has been towards Manchester City, from what I've observed, perhaps because of that exact dynamic you just described (i bolded it).