Bluemoon goes into Meltdown

[Earthquake]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

Flower Among Them All, or A Flower Among Rags.

 

[CM]

That Mani guy is back, but on Bluemoon this time



Apparently, I got him banned

I like how he has to justify having an account on an online forum to prevent his fellow bitters from attacking him

 

[Stookie]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

"Loves Bluemoon....and they love him"

 

[Tom Van Persie]

Job well done @VanGaalEra

 

[Trizy]

Well he's right, we're just that much bigger than them and the fact that no one honestly cares about them winning the title.

 

[Trizy]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

rag petal?

 

[VanGaalEra]

West Ham game:

four minutes of stoppage is a joke. should have been a minimum of 6

4 Minutes of stoppage time atrocious. 3 minutes of those wasted by the other team. Not 1 card, not even a talking to. fecking get out.

Ref couldnt wait to blow the final whistle.

How on gods green earth did we not score in that second half and that Bony sub has pissed me off so much I've gone tomato faced, tumescent shite.

Ref under instructions to make sure we got feck all.

Completely outrageous we didn't win that game. We're not going to be allowed to walk away with this league and we're hamstringing ourselves by having Navas in our first 11. Should have been awarded 10 minutes stoppage time.

Someone tell this guy we've already had a game week since the international break:

I fecking hate international breaks

The ref is a cheat, end of. 4 mins, utterly ridiculous and then during the extra time more time wasting and we get an extra 18 seconds. A CHEAT.

Joe Hart is pants

That has to be the most one-sided refereeing performance you're ever likely to see, absolute disgrace.

I can't stand West Ham, they are very bitter against us even if media try to portray us as ''best friends''. Sucks to lose to them.

yaya send him back to where he came from. useless punch of lazy player. Navas, another overpaid lazy runners, that doesnt know how to pass to a player on same team...
utterly gutted of the result. wigwams from east london bunch of lucky guys, ......

Someone responded:

Mate just feck off you rag

At the end of the day, this utterly diabolical ref was not the one who failed to convert about (seemingly) 50 scoring chances.

But

FOUR MINUTES OF STOPPAGE TIME!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

With the subs, with that injury-faking twat accounting for four minutes on his own. For Adrian, who should have seen yellow at some point in the first half for time-wasting and this being prior to all his fecking time-wasting in the second half.

FOUR feckING MINUTES!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

That is 1996 FA Cup phantom penno at the Swamp level of corrupt. What the actual feck!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Weakest referee performance ever

Now I'm listening to the sky sports pundits try and talk up Westham's parking of the bus into saying they played us off the park or something stupid as usual, there will be no mention of the two decisions the linesman got wrong where the ball didnt go out(no corner for their second goal he was yards away and they defended the linesman for it? same thing at the other end goal kick wrongly given) and no mention of the amount of time wasting(they were actually doing it from the first half... no cards given or attempt to hurry them up by the ref) and the measly 4 mins added on.

Linesman was definitely a West Ham fan.

 

[Rolandofgilead]

Liverpool, Porto, AC Milan

The 2007 side that battered us in the san siro?

 

[Earthquake]

rag petal?

Raggy flower!

 

[VanGaalEra]

Raggy flower!

 

[VanGaalEra]

How bad is this one from their media bias/agenda thread:

Media get on my tits. The Rags went into Europe in 1956 and won it in 1968 - bleeding 12 years - yet the present day media expect City to win it year one.

 

[VanGaalEra]

Looking at the MuEN web page last week they had 25 or so photos of Mcr landmarks taken from the old bill chopper. Old Scaffold was there of course but no Etihad! cnuts, even Burys ground was there and if I'm not mistaken, Rockports Edgely park ffs!

 

[VanGaalEra]

ManiManc again

vangaalera.....
like a moth to a flame...
keep nibbling petal...
mwah
x

 

[Summit]

How bad is this one from their media bias/agenda thread:

Yeah, how dare the Munich disaster in 1958 thwart our attempt to win it sooner.

 

[Snow]

West Ham game:

Someone tell this guy we've already had a game week since the international break:

Someone responded:

I thought the match day forum was horrible last match on here but it was different kind of bad to this. You have to assume that most of those posters are pretty young given City's recent influx of cash so they're perhaps only acting their age.

 

[Earthquake]

I thought the match day forum was horrible last match on here but it was different kind of bad to this. You have to assume that most of those posters are pretty young given City's recent influx of cash so they're perhaps only acting their age.

They can't be *that* young, sure Chelsea was taken over in 2003.

 

[Snow]

They can't be *that* young, sure Chelsea was taken over in 2003.

Sure they can. Many people only start following football seriously around puberty. If you were born in '93 and were 10 when Chelsea became rich and started winning things you'd be 22 now so the baby-Chelsea boomers are adults.

 

[Hammerfell]

ManiManc again

There's something not quite right about him.

 

[dwd]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

It has to be 'petal x' surely?

 

[marukomu]

This thread is always a disappointment compared to the RAWK thread. Only one quote from after the West Ham defeat, it's fairly textbook football-fan-on-the-internet rant.

Where's the conspiracies and the ragsragsrags?

That's because there are just not enough of them. All those empty PC chairs.

 

[Fellainis Nutmeg]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

Bluemoon Rag of the year A.K.A. "Petal"

 

[Cooksen]

How bad is this one from their media bias/agenda thread:

That level of ignorance/stupidity is too strong

 

[VanGaalEra]

That level of ignorance/stupidity is too strong

Not even sure it's ignorance, he must know.

Anyway, the media aren't saying they have to win the CL, they're saying they should be doing better then the group stages and round of 16.

 

[Eric'sCollar]

I used to go to RAWK for a laugh. I might need to start heading over here from time to time for a chuckle.

 

[nistleloy]

Public enemy number one

4000 posts on a football forum in 14 months, has van gaal era ever satisfied a woman? And does his post code have M in it? Two big questions of the day.

Bet his has SK in it.

 

[acrebo]

People keep saying they haven't played anybody yet but i bet you a pound to a penny that Spurs and Liverpool don't bend over as easily for us. It's always been the same for us. Teams REALLY want to beat us and prove a point whereas when the rag tops turn up they don't play with same intensity! Got a funny feeling it will be us and them closely followed by Chelsea going for the title.

Yep, we'e never had teams raise their games against us. We've not been top dog for 2 years now and STILL we're the focus of everyone's attentions wee in, week out.

City losing to West Ham, at home, has gone by with barely a whimper. Yet you can imagine the scrutiny we'd have received had we lost away to Southampton.

I swear Luke Shaw's injury has been talked about more than our last title win. I feel bad for the lad but people are acting like he died. Pundits seem to have a ready made excuse if united lose, they will just say "the players are still affected by what happened to Shaw." It feels like they are willing to use a players horrific injury in order to appease united fans in the event that they lose a game which just feels so wrong ethically.

Wow. So, this lad has managed to assume that we might have used Shaw's injury as an excuse for losing to Southampton. Of course, he can't actually evidence any of this seeing as we didn't lose and the only reference to Shaw I've seen from the club is a few players dedicating the win to him.

To clarify, it's wrong for us to use Shaw as an excuse for losing (which we haven't done) but it's okay for him to complain that Shaw has "only broken his leg" and suggest we'd use it as an excuse in the first place? Some levels of cuntery transcends football rivalry.

 

[WengersWingMan]

times

That's brilliant to read @VanGaalEra !

This poor sod doesn't get it..this has been the case for United the last 20 years, and winning the league a couple of times with the help of some laughable sheiks won't change that. They really are shitting their pants.

Saw this from a West Ham fan (personally I disagree but anyway)

Man City might as well not exist in my view, wouldn't make a difference. I feel nothing when they win, nothing when they lose and even less when they win the league.

For all of Chelsea's faults - of which there are ****loads - they at least managed to build some sense of relevance by having long-serving players like Drogba, Terry, Lampard, Cole, Cech etc. in their team. You point to those as all-time Chelsea greats.

Man City just feels like a mercenary band. Like a greatest hits collection of the players not good enough to play for Real Madrid and Barcelona. They still don't feel like a real top side to me yet, even though they've won the league etc. They have no identity; they're a perpetual all-star team.

Beating them yesterday didn't feel as good as beating Arsenal or Liverpool. I think that says a lot, considering they're probably the strongest side in the league at the moment.

 

[Kylar Stern]

Saw this from a West Ham fan (personally I disagree but anyway)

Man City might as well not exist in my view, wouldn't make a difference. I feel nothing when they win, nothing when they lose and even less when they win the league.

For all of Chelsea's faults - of which there are ****loads - they at least managed to build some sense of relevance by having long-serving players like Drogba, Terry, Lampard, Cole, Cech etc. in their team. You point to those as all-time Chelsea greats.

Man City just feels like a mercenary band. Like a greatest hits collection of the players not good enough to play for Real Madrid and Barcelona. They still don't feel like a real top side to me yet, even though they've won the league etc. They have no identity; they're a perpetual all-star team.

Beating them yesterday didn't feel as good as beating Arsenal or Liverpool. I think that says a lot, considering they're probably the strongest side in the league at the moment.

Actually agree with large parts of that, however City will be looking at the likes of Hart, Kompany, Zabaletta, Toure, Silva and Aguero as their Cech/Terry/Lampard/Drogba style 'club men', assuming they aren't shipped out in the next few years for shinier toys.

Fair enough IMO

 

[VanGaalEra]

Same guy who said Fergie retired because of an argument with Woodward, posted this regarding why/how we gave Rooney his pay rise.

I've told this story before but I'll tell it again because that revelation put it into a new light. Rooney doubled his wage package that day in 2010 from 90k a week (whcih was their maximum salary) to 180k. He got that because other clubs were told he was available and one (not us) was definitely negotiating with the rags to buy him. The Glazers had initially refused to sanction an increase but this other club had put a contract on the table offering him £160k a week. Gill and Baconface then went back to the Glazers to tell them this and they reluctantly agreed to Rooney's demand for £180k in order to keep him.

At the time, my source reckoned it was all part of a clever scheme by Gill & Ferguson because the 90k limit was hurting their ability to recruit top class players (remember "no value in the market"?) and is probably the reason they couldn't sign Tevez. Now it seems that Baconface was also dipping his beak as well and got annoyed because a player was getting more than him so you have to wonder whether that was at least a part of the motivation for setting the whole thing up.

And Rooney is still on the same basic contract he signed in 2010. When he signed his new one, his agent insisted that he got a part of any commercial deals that the rags signed, subject to agreement that taking part in promotions or activities for these didn't take up excessive time and impact his performance. Sounds like Wazza is ignoring that part of the deal. Baconface, being a greedy bastard, is no doubt on the same deal.

 

[VanGaalEra]

Sorry to reduce an informative discussion in such simplistic terms but United sense of importance and self-entitlement since the air crash means their rivalry only extends to who has more trophies than them, geography doesn't really come into it and, as strictly speaking, they don't come from Manchester, nor should we expect it to.

I do expect that over the coming decades that their level of bitterness will begin to increase as we slowly begin to close the gap in the trophy stakes and if, God forbid, we ever manage to obtain a Champions League or two, then I fear the streets may not be safe. The presumption here being that the legions of glory hunting plastics won't have long deserted their armchairs in the intervening period.

Chelsea could get there before us of course and is geographically a more natural derby but in the meantime we should expect nothing but counting of seats until we reach the teens.

Just caught some of the pisscans interview on BBC News... ''During my reign at united''

your ''reign''?? What kind of an arrogant, self opinionated twat talks like that?

I thought he's supposed to be a working class, socialist man of the people

 

[Dr. Dwayne]

that doesn't sound bitter or small time at all!

 

[VanGaalEra]

Our best friend ManiManc quoting a United fan over there:

Whereas you lot went into headless chicken mode at the first hint of operation win everything going tits up.
Sending a plane up with moyes out was small minded and spoilt brat behaviour to say the least.
You lot couldn't handle half a season of "transition " under wee Davy, feck knows how many empty seats we'd see at the swamp if you spent 30 odd years in the wilderness like we did.
So why don't you and your patronising shite posts feck off back to ragcafe with all the other armchair fans claiming to be diehards since 1992.

 

[Brightonian]

Well, they are the experts in empty seats. We really have no experience in that area whatsoever.

 

[Vanrouge]

Our best friend ManiManc quoting a United fan over there:

We had 26 years in the wilderness and still managed the highest attendances: even in the old second division, I remember us getting 60,000. So much for that argument.

 

[Phurry]

Our best friend ManiManc quoting a United fan over there:

I'm a prophet

Oh, you're going to be popular here

 

[marukomu]

I'm a prophet

and a pusher. Partly truth, partly fiction.

 

[OnlyTwoDaSilvas]

Sorry to reduce an informative discussion in such simplistic terms but United sense of importance and self-entitlement since the air crash means their rivalry only extends to who has more trophies than them, geography doesn't really come into it and, as strictly speaking, they don't come from Manchester, nor should we expect it to.
I do expect that over the coming decades that their level of bitterness will begin to increase as we slowly begin to close the gap in the trophy stakes and if, God forbid, we ever manage to obtain a Champions League or two, then I fear the streets may not be safe. The presumption here being that the legions of glory hunting plastics won't have long deserted their armchairs in the intervening period.
Chelsea could get there before us of course and is geographically a more natural derby but in the meantime we should expect nothing but counting of seats until we reach the teens.

Ha. They really are pissed that we view Liverpool as a bigger rival than City.

 

[Mojo_]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

I'd go simply for Rag Tag

 

[Hammerfell]

Yes, obviously. Still thinking about one...suggestions are welcome.

Something with rag in it, of course. "Like a red rag to a blue".

 

[pierrethesnack]

Saw this from a West Ham fan (personally I disagree but anyway)

Man City might as well not exist in my view, wouldn't make a difference. I feel nothing when they win, nothing when they lose and even less when they win the league.

For all of Chelsea's faults - of which there are ****loads - they at least managed to build some sense of relevance by having long-serving players like Drogba, Terry, Lampard, Cole, Cech etc. in their team. You point to those as all-time Chelsea greats.

Man City just feels like a mercenary band. Like a greatest hits collection of the players not good enough to play for Real Madrid and Barcelona. They still don't feel like a real top side to me yet, even though they've won the league etc. They have no identity; they're a perpetual all-star team.

Beating them yesterday didn't feel as good as beating Arsenal or Liverpool. I think that says a lot, considering they're probably the strongest side in the league at the moment.

A bit how I feel, tbh.