Mali_Zeus
New Member
A wee meltdown. City fan in the Bluemoon meltdown thread.What in the name of all that is good and holy happened here?
Very appropriate.
A wee meltdown. City fan in the Bluemoon meltdown thread.What in the name of all that is good and holy happened here?
Yeah he actually deserves credit for keeping it in the right thread.A wee meltdown. City fan in the Bluemoon meltdown thread.
Very appropriate.
Well actually I am with Ronette on that. It is the case that if many people love (eg.) cats, they do care about them even though they do not hate them.Er, yes it does.
A better lesson might be to not start laughing and drawing idiotic conclusions without actually engaging your brain. There's a whole load of people on here who have COMPLETELY got it wrong, and actually made fools of themselves but luckily for them they can't even see it.
Obviously not. But you can't say anything at all about the remaining 92 % and how they feel about City. Although it's safe to assume that some of the ones voting for United are City fans.Well actually I am with Ronette on that. It is the case that if many people love (eg.) cats, they do care about them even though they do not hate them.
In the abstract it is certainly true that not-hating does not equal not-caring-about.
The problem is that Talksport only polled 8% of Mike Summerbee.
Well actually I am with Ronette on that. It is the case that if many people love (eg.) cats, they do care about them even though they do not hate them.
In the abstract it is certainly true that not-hating does not equal not-caring-about.
Laugh all you like pal, but it's not me who's completely lost any sense of logic. Have a think on it.
THANK YOU!
At last someone with an ounce of intelligence.
Fair enough, at least it looks like you understand, unlike half the dimwits on here.
A better lesson might be to not start laughing and drawing idiotic conclusions without actually engaging your brain. There's a whole load of people on here who have COMPLETELY got it wrong, and actually made fools of themselves but luckily for them they can't even see it.
True.
I never claimed otherwise. Unlike all the idiots on here who did wrongly conclude otherwise.
Well actually I am with Ronette on that. It is the case that if many people love (eg.) cats, they do care about them even though they do not hate them.
In the abstract it is certainly true that not-hating does not equal not-caring-about.
Indeed. Which is why I wondered if Ronetta was talking about the care-for meaning of care-about.Obviously not. But you can't say anything at all about the remaining 92 % and how they feel about City. Although it's safe to assume that some of the ones voting for United are City fans.
You have to leave it out in the sun for a while, if it melts then it's ice cream.What do I need to do to show I care about a team?
Had a nosey what them lot have been saying about us (ragcafe, facebook etc) they now have it in their heads that their a superia team to us. They genuinely think they have the devine right to beat us and they are better than us in every aspect.
For f*ck sake City! Why do you do it to us? We really need to stop arsing about and put that shite back in it's place, nothing worse than uneducated, over excited united fans. Embarrassing!
No I didn't. You've just invented that. I just posted a link saying you were largely hated by non-United supporters.
[...].
I tried to read one of his posts but a video started playing.
Well certainly that is the valid viewpoint advanced in rebuttal of the poll's original employment. But we all got that. It is trying to understand the mystery of Ronetta's intention that intrigues me though.It does prove that 42% give a shit enough about United to hate on them. And that hate is because we're the biggest and most successful in England. Clearly this is the point.
In addition, seeing that massive, new money being lavished on a club who then win the title normally leads to a lot of hate (Chelsea for example) I'd say a reading of only 6% does say it all. It would probably be a similar kind of reading for Blackburn at their pomp.
Well certainly that is the valid viewpoint advanced in rebuttal of the poll's original employment. But we all got that. It is trying to understand the mystery of Ronetta's intention that intrigues me though.
A wee meltdown. City fan in the Bluemoon meltdown thread.
Very appropriate.
What made me laugh is when he showed such a high percentage hating United and then said why do you think that is?
Purely because we've been successful.
Why would a City fan use that to try to justify themselves.
I think there was a non-recognition of the whole, you have to care about something to hate it angle that made him(?) use the post in the first place.He may be desperately trying to back pedal now, but he was originally saying 'Ok, maybe no one gives a shit about us, but at least we're not hated – and here's the link'. So yes he did mess it up for himself.
Ronetta goes into Meltdown 2014/15 - Ice Cream Edition
Yet more illustrious Talksport polls:
http://talksport.com/poll/poll-did-sol-campbell-do-anything-wrong-moving-spurs-ars*nal-14031283204
Ronetta Stone. Learn how to talk trash, the City way.
The problem is that Talksport only polled 8% of Mike Summerbee.
Maybe if City had some kind of identity, they'd have a tad more notoriety. I "care" about Dortmund because of how well they are run, i love their football and i feel bad that they lose their best players. I "care" for Atletico for breaking the stranglehold Real and Barca had in La Liga last year. I "care" for teams that are run well and/or are good, historic clubs such as Everton and Newcastle. You have an opinion on a club if it has some form of notoriety in the footballing world. But City? Well, er...they're one of those oil clubs aren't they? That's basically what they're known for. Even more so when you consider barely anyone outside England had heard of them before 2008.
Maybe if City had some kind of identity, they'd have a tad more notoriety. I "care" about Dortmund because of how well they are run, i love their football and i feel bad that they lose their best players. I "care" for Atletico for breaking the stranglehold Real and Barca had in La Liga last year. I "care" for teams that are run well and/or are good, historic clubs such as Everton and Newcastle. You have an opinion on a club if it has some form of notoriety in the footballing world. But City? Well, er...they're one of those oil clubs aren't they? That's basically what they're known for. Even more so when you consider barely anyone outside England had heard of them before 2008.
2. City sell out the vast majority of our games as well. We do seem to have more empty seats, but there's various reasons for that, one being that most of ours are in direct view of the cameras, whereas yours tend to be high up in the stands and not noticed as much. It is true however, that we do have more people than I would like to see not turning up. Whether that's rich season ticket holders who can't be arsed, or corporate stuff or whatever I don't know and it is an issue, but not to the extent those on here would have you believe. And without selling the seats twice, there's not a lot we can do about it.
3. We are a working class club and for many supporters 2 games a week is just not affordable.
They still havent. I was talking to someone in Wales the other day who thought when people said Manchester City they were differentiating the city from the football club. As in, Manchester the city, not Manchester United the football club.Maybe if City had some kind of identity, they'd have a tad more notoriety. I "care" about Dortmund because of how well they are run, i love their football and i feel bad that they lose their best players. I "care" for Atletico for breaking the stranglehold Real and Barca had in La Liga last year. I "care" for teams that are run well and/or are good, historic clubs such as Everton and Newcastle. You have an opinion on a club if it has some form of notoriety in the footballing world. But City? Well, er...they're one of those oil clubs aren't they? That's basically what they're known for. Even more so when you consider barely anyone outside England had heard of them before 2008.
They still havent. I was talking to someone in Wales the other day who thought when people said Manchester City they were differentiating the city from the football club. As in, Manchester the city, not Manchester United the football club.
Maybe if City had some kind of identity, they'd have a tad more notoriety. I "care" about Dortmund because of how well they are run, i love their football and i feel bad that they lose their best players. I "care" for Atletico for breaking the stranglehold Real and Barca had in La Liga last year. I "care" for teams that are run well and/or are good, historic clubs such as Everton and Newcastle. You have an opinion on a club if it has some form of notoriety in the footballing world. But City? Well, er...they're one of those oil clubs aren't they? That's basically what they're known for. Even more so when you consider barely anyone outside England had heard of them before 2008.
This is true. If the success is manufactured people find it a turn off.Even now Chelsea struggle in terms of fans because of it
Newcastle haven't won a league title since 1927 and an FA Cup since 1955. They have no European honours. If you had respect for the history of a club like Newcastle then you should be able to respect the history of City pre-2008.
Is that genuine?This guy thought, when City had won the league, that maybe Manchester had won the European Capital of Culture, or some other prestigious award for cities.