Yes, we could do with having the tallest floodlights in the League.
Bluemoon goes into Meltdown
- Thread starter Logan!
- Start date
Yes, we could do with having the tallest floodlights in the League.
Oh dear, blue logic in full effect it appears.
It's a good indicator. You're only relevant to anyone because you won the lotto. We're hated by everyone because we're the most successful team in the land. Do you think you were the 4th most hated team in England when Shaun Goater was banging them in in the old division 2.
This sounds like RAWK logic. Sure you're following the right club pal?
Let it go, you embarassed yourself, end of.
Thank god we've got you to educate us through Talksport links.
No, no, let him keep digging, who knows what he'll find....
He probably will keep digging.
Talksport is the law you know.
This will end well.
Why be a city fan on a United forum if you didnt give a shit?
Know why im not on a City forum? Even you can get this... (Though on second thought probably not)
Know why im not on a City forum? Even you can get this... (Though on second thought probably not)
Irony, irony every where.
Wait, people don't like us?
We have our own bluemoon live here so to say.
So now youre debunking the point you made?
You should be banned for deliberately wumming yourself.
Ronetta 
The irony in Ronetta calling everyone else dim.
Is everyone who thinks I have dropped a clanger, TRYING to be spectacularly dense? Or is it just natural to you lot?
How can no-one understand the difference between not being hated and not be cared about? Really it's not difficult to differentiate between the two, and yet there are dozens on here who seem incapable of grasping that.
And then you have Señor - with the handle "Humungous twit" - saying it's ironic that I called people dim, when in fact they ARE being dim.
Now THAT is ironic. Fecking hilarious :-)
How can no-one understand the difference between not being hated and not be cared about? Really it's not difficult to differentiate between the two, and yet there are dozens on here who seem incapable of grasping that.
And then you have Señor - with the handle "Humungous twit" - saying it's ironic that I called people dim, when in fact they ARE being dim.
Now THAT is ironic. Fecking hilarious :-)
I didn't say *I* didn't give a shit. Do keep up.
@Ronetta it was you who used the hating us stats as a proxy for how much people cared. So if you are now dismissing the link, youll have to explain what your original point was.
A summary for those who dont want to scroll back:
Scarley: Nobody gives a shit about City.
Ronetta: Unlike United. Lots of people give a shit about United, look at these stats I have that show how much everyone hates you. I wonder why that is.
RedCafe: Er... precisely.
Ronetta: Youre all stupid, what has giving a shit about something got to do with hating it?
RedCafe: Damn. We're not used to this level of intellectual dexterity here.
A summary for those who dont want to scroll back:
Scarley: Nobody gives a shit about City.
Ronetta: Unlike United. Lots of people give a shit about United, look at these stats I have that show how much everyone hates you. I wonder why that is.
RedCafe: Er... precisely.
Ronetta: Youre all stupid, what has giving a shit about something got to do with hating it?
RedCafe: Damn. We're not used to this level of intellectual dexterity here.
Yup, we are all dim and Ronetta is smart.
Last few pages - some great stuff. Really made my day.
Last few pages - some great stuff. Really made my day.
I sense a meltdown coming.
This baby is starting to pickup readings.
Reminds me the liverpool fan who lost argument with imaginary united fan.
Er, yes it does.
I always find that you have to care about something in order to hate it. If I don't care about something then I treat it with indifference.
The sort of indifference that would amount to about 6% on a survey of giving a shit.
No I didn't. You've just invented that. I just posted a link saying you were largely hated by non-United supporters.
I am not dismissing it. It just doesn't say what people on here are concluding it says.
OK
Yes, precisely, lots of people hate United, as per the article. The article also says not many people hate City. I note it doesn't say how many people like City or are interested in City or uninterested in City.
Everyone with no brain wants the article to say no-one cares about City, but unfortunately it doesn't say anything of the sort.
That's not what I said. I said NOT being hated is not the same as NOT being cared about. Only 8% of supporters hating City does not mean only 8% couldn't give a shit about City. Anyone who can't differentiate the two positions, is a bit stupid.
Evidently some are not.
The problem is that Talksport only polled 8% of Mike Summerbee.
Go on son, go on!!!
being champions, and not even being able to sell out your ground is quite telling.
Oh wait...it's always down to "traffic problems" whenever I watch a stream of your games and see tonnes of empty seats. No it's not.
The traffic problems are obviously caused by the seats trying to get in.
Ronetta said:
Er, no it doesn't. 100 people are asked if they like ice cream. 8 people say they hate it.
How many people are passionate about ice cream? 8?
What about the 63 people who said they LOVE ice cream? 71 people care about ice cream. 8 people hate it and 63 people love it.
You are saying only 8 people give a shit about ice cream. Clearly you are wrong.
You're correct (despite my white text shenanigans) The problem is using the survey to back up your argument gives everybody the perception that you've argued against yourself.
Help me out here, mate. Apparently I'm a bit dim. Didn't you post that article to somehow prove that people cared about City? Or was it just to say 'See, people hate you guys a lot, checkmate, son!'. Which would in turn be an entirely different thing to what was being discussed.