croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,763
Yeah I am convinced this isn't Varane's replacement but some will think it is
Quoted 35m is not much for player with such solid experience. Low risk.
Todibo's relatively young age, at some point could be decisive factor. It's a good situation to be in, but if United won't take action, City, Chelsea Arsenal, or Pool will.
He’s played 109 games at CB.
44 of those at Bayern.
17 of those this season just past.
In the champions league last season he played against Barcelona, PSG and Inter Milan and kept clean sheets as a CB in those games.
Pavard knows what to do and when to do it across the right flank; he’s not a project or someone still learning on the job like our current options are, and moreover, he can be trusted with tactical instructions, like Shaw. I don’t know how that isn’t transformational compared to what we currently have in the position who are learning on the job and found wanting in numerous aspects of RB play let alone these tucking and inverting aspects. Pavard is also a legitimate goal threat who needs to be closed down before he shoots which in turn provides space and opportunities for his flanker and those inside (Bruno) in ways we simply cannot conjure up at the moment.
He’s a huge upgrade on what we have in the position and he covers another role as well as enabling smooth switches to a back 3 in-game. He’s a transformative player by definition for us as so much of what he would provide, we are currently bereft of.
Sooner or later we'll have to. If Todibo's quoted fee is really about 35m then perhaps in January, as he'll definitely spark interest from rivals.Like I keep saying I still expect us to suitably replace Varane but won't be right now
-----------------------Onana
----------Pavard--Varane--Licha
---------------------Casemiro
Antony-Bruno-Mount-Rashford-Shaw
-----------------------Hojlund
This 3-1-6 is a very common in possession shape for Ten Hag.
A big part of the reason he wants to leave Bayern is he doesn't want to play RB so much I believe. Dalot also just signed a new contract so...Forget the CB thing, he’s a massive improvement on RB. Sign him for that alone and sell Dalot.
Dalot only got a new contract because we didn’t have the money to go big on a RB this summer, and Shaw will play CB at some point, so Dalot will give Malacia competition for LB.A big part of the reason he wants to leave Bayern is he doesn't want to play RB so much I believe. Dalot also just signed a new contract so...
What stats would that be? Feel free to share, love me some stats I doJeez just seen the stats,WOW
Not sure I follow. We signed Martinez, Hojlund, Antony, Mount, Malacia & Onana under EtH. Surely those are all long term signings? Granted we’ve needed to add some experience in there (Casemiro) & cheap signings due to budget constraints (Eriksen), but surely you’ve seen a big shift in the age profile of our signings?This is becoming a serious concern as far as the prospective direction for the team in the long run. One criticism for both ETH alongside Murtough is that they are putting a team together as opposed to building one. Almost like ETH is the manager of the club for the next 3 years as opposed to a multitude of seasons.
There needs to be more of a long-term strategy in the market especially in a financial climate where its nearly impossible to compete with the Chelsea's, Newcastle's and City's refreshing a squad every few seasons. This is a poor signing and add Amrabat if Mctomminay leaves it's not a good profile of transfers for me personally.
Not sure I follow. We signed Martinez, Hojlund, Antony, Mount, Malacia & Onana under EtH. Surely those are all long term signings? Granted we’ve needed to add some experience in there (Casemiro) & cheap signings due to budget constraints (Eriksen), but surely you’ve seen a big shift in the age profile of our signings?
Good shouts. Really not following what that poster means.Also integrated Garnacho into the squad, with Mainoo looking like he will have his breakthrough season too.
His shooting needs to be closed down, much more so than Dalot, and AWB doesn’t even enter that equation. Players on the pitch don’t quote goal returns and not close down threats with Pavard’s shooting, which means he will always create chain reactions, which were referred to in my post. There’s no claim he’s an attacking talent, but he’s better at it than what we have both in execution and understanding, in fact his game intelligence is what gives him so much over either of them.I think you lost me when you argued he was a legitimate goal threat. He has 13 goals in 270 appearances for club and country, and that includes 4 seasons at a club that averages 95 goals a season. He's a more defensively minded full back, as befits his experience at CB. Just because his highlights reel has a few bangers doesn't mean that's commonplace.
I agree he'd be better when playing as an inverted full back, but Shaw excels in that role already, hence why AWB ends up going forward so much. Being able to do it from the other side and release Shaw occasionally would be useful, but hardly a game changer.
Again, this isn't to say he's not better. Rather than I think we could improve the squad more by getting another attacker and living with AWB/Dalot for another season.
Also integrated Garnacho into the squad, with Mainoo looking like he will have his breakthrough season too.
If we sign him then maybe we will see him at RB but tuck in MF more and even hve the option to use Dalot as RW sometimes or sub in to defend the lead.
There's only 3 and 3.5 years in it to be fair. 27 isn't exactly ancient for a CB. Varane will likely get phased out in the next 3-4 years which leaves plenty of time to get in a replacement, somone in the 22-25 years old bracket. Don't see this as being much different from getting a 23 year old now from a succession planning perspective. Only matters if you expect to sell these players later on, which is generally not our MOI agree that he’d be a great option. It’s only that the other names appeared to represent not only an option, but longer term succession planning too. They are a fair bit younger and with good growth potential to succeed Varane in time.
What stats would that be? Feel free to share, love me some stats I do
Antony could do with some better attacking output, but defensively (which I think you probably need in that shape) he is quite goodThat looks bloody solid, although you could argue that Antony is a weak link.
That looks bloody solid, although you could argue that Antony is a weak link.
Pavard would give ETH more tactical flexibility. If you wanted martinez to step up into a box midfield, pavard could come in from RB to make up the 3 man defence.Has anyone considered that he's also being signed so EtH can post him RB and have him invert into DM and play John Stone's role?
EtH tried it this preseason with Dalot and AWB, but they're not up to the task tactically.
At some point besides Pavard, we could use a younger central defender, also for the sake of refreshing the formation.I am a huge fan of Pavard as others will tell you,however if they view him as a starter CB then should look at the other two
His shooting needs to be closed down, much more so than Dalot, and AWB doesn’t even enter that equation. Players on the pitch don’t quote goal returns and not close down threats with Pavard’s shooting, which means he will always create chain reactions, which were referred to in my post. There’s no claim he’s an attacking talent, but he’s better at it than what we have both in execution and understanding, in fact his game intelligence is what gives him so much over either of them.
Being able to invert on either side of the pitch is game-changing! How can it not be? It means play can be switched, an entire side probed securely and most importantly, it makes us more unpredictable beings as this can be done on a whim.
If you’re looking beyond this season with regard to the prospects of our full-backs, being cynical, you’d expect both to be sold and Pavard then used as cover in two positions. In a cutthroat world, he’d have his chance to secure a starting berth this term or be upgraded upon next, which is squad progression in its purest form.
Pavard addresses so many issues in the here and now that it’s quite ridiculous. He’s the definition of transformative given the flexibility and tactical optioning he, by himself, provides simply by being an eclectic FB as opposed to the two purists we have out there now who still are well below par despite that being their only role.
Not sure if he was referring to these but these are his top level stats which from a glance look pretty outstanding
https://fbref.com/en/players/45a03961/Benjamin-Pavard
Remains to be seen about Antony. My feeling is we might see exactly why we signed him in this coming year. I really hope he kicks on and ETH coaching and vision unleashes something special. I have definitely seen glimpses of it with himThat looks bloody solid, although you could argue that Antony is a weak link.
Aren't we looking for cover or competition and not a Varane replacement.I am a huge fan of Pavard as others will tell you,however if they view him as a starter CB then should look at the other two
It’s not ‘excitedness’ (I’m not going to muppet out over a Pavard), it’s what he brings to the table. You’re free to refute it as you please. Compared to what we have at RB, he’s a sizeable upgrade across the board. You’d only roll AWB out for high-end 1vs1 battles or rotation with Pavard here.I appreciate your excitedness about a new player, but it does really feel like the new-transferitis, where a player can do no wrong and solves many ills at once. All I can say is, if we sign him up, lets hope you're right and I'm wrong!