BBC: United hold talks with Mourinho

Would you be happy to see Jose Mourinho become next United manager?


  • Total voters
    1,749
Status
Not open for further replies.
It never got to the offering stage because Ferguson and United wanted someone else.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2012/nov/27/david-moyes-everton-contract

First off you have Moyes in November stalling on renewing his Everton contract, when in the past he had signed extensions around that time. Do you think that it's a complete coincidence that after 11 years Moyes starts playing cagey about a new contract the same year Ferguson retires?

Then we have the infamous meeting where Moyes was summoned to Ferguson's house (in jeans no less) to be informed he was the next United manager. It has been widely rumoured that this meeting took place a few months before Moyes claimed it took place in March/April.

We also had quotes from Ferguson himself that he advised Moyes not to renew his Everton contract in Febuary. Personally i reckon this conversation took place well before then, but even if it did take place in febuary that is still sooner in the timescale than when Ferguson spoke with Klopp in April.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...s-sign-new-Everton-deal-hold-bigger-club.html



And finally back then we had all the talk coming out of United that they wanted a man to replace Ferguson who would stay for years and years and try to replicate Fergusons longevity. So who had the highest chance of doing that?

Mourinho..nope, Guardiola...nope, Ancelotti...nope, Klopp...doubtful or Moyes who just spent 12 years at Everton..Yep

Moyes was and always was the first and only choice from the beginning.

It was rumoured for years by loads of decent journos as well that Moyes was the man who would replace Ferguson. Ferguson was also very outspoken over the years about the fact he thought British managers should get more chances at the big clubs in England. You think after all that talk he was going to retire and choose a German or Spanish coach to replace him? No chance.


I believe this is the logical sequence of events, despite the revisionism of SAF and a few others.

Jose cant get here fast enough IMO.
 
Not sure how much is in this article. No quotes or attributions in it - would be easy to make something like this up.

Btw, wonder how season ticket sales are going at the moment? Surely people are waiting until they know who the new manager is going to be, right?

Its typical MEN really.
 
Luckhurst been proven time and time again to know feck all. Annoys me how he gets away with it.
 
You're making it sound like we were second BVB who was taken from God knows what place to 'nearly' the top and we should be happy about it. Also, the money argument is quite funny because he's spent what, 200 mln quid in two years? And we're not 4th yet this season, it's not granted we will be.

And no, he doesn't know that 1-0 victories are important therefore we play for 1-0 victories, he's just a boring shite and more often than not we're incapable of scoring more than 1 goal. Let's not bend the reality please.

No but we did lose possibly the best manager of all time plus our CEO. It is almost certain that the club would suffer a significant impact. Plus we had Moyes which dropped us to 7th.

In that regard, we did need time to stabilise and get back on our feet before sprinting.

Spent 200m but we recouped from sales and lowered wage bill.

It is also ridiculous to say he doesn't know 1-0 victories are important. The Mourinho that many seem to want so badly has had a reputation of playing for 1-0 victories.
 
Btw, wonder how season ticket sales are going at the moment? Surely people are waiting until they know who the new manager is going to be, right?

I don't think you can tell much about season ticket sales until a day or two after the renewal deadline passes which is the end of May. I never renew mine until just before the deadline anyway as I might as well pay for it as late as possible. I would guess a lot of people do the same even if they know they are going to renew.
 
No but we did lose possibly the best manager of all time plus our CEO. It is almost certain that the club would suffer a significant impact. Plus we had Moyes which dropped us to 7th.

In that regard, we did need time to stabilise and get back on our feet before sprinting.

Spent 200m but we recouped from sales and lowered wage bill.

It is also ridiculous to say he doesn't know 1-0 victories are important. The Mourinho that many seem to want so badly has had a reputation of playing for 1-0 victories.

It's ridiculous to imply that we grind out 1-0s because he knows that 1-0 victories are important when there are matches where we have whole 1, 2 or 0 shots on target.

And if we finish outside of top 4 then we have massively regressed compared to last season so yea, there goes the stabilisation you're talking about. You could probably make a strong point that even at the moment we've already regressed compared to last season.
 
This is thread is killing me..I click in hope the hope that something concrete has happened, some reliable source has come forward....but alas its same all over again.

This is so much like Muppet season , we cling on in hope something might happen but nothing happens.

Cmon José ,just tell the world you have been in contact with the club, u big gobshite!
 
It's ridiculous to imply that we grind out 1-0s because he knows that 1-0 victories are important when there are matches where we have whole 1, 2 or 0 shots on target.

And if we finish outside of top 4 then we have massively regressed compared to last season so yea, there goes the stabilisation you're talking about. You could probably make a strong point that even at the moment we've already regressed compared to last season.
I recall one match we had against Chelsea when Mourinho had like two proper counter attacks against us and scored from one, then shut up shop. That's an actual tactic.

League table position is one aspect of the club, albeit an important one. By stability I also refer to coaching, scouting, youth, training, player relationships, politics and commercialisation. Losing SAF and Gill, then getting Moyes was as chaotic as you can get for a behemoth like United.
 
This is thread is killing me..I click in hope the hope that something concrete has happened, some reliable source has come forward....but alas its same all over again.

This is so much like Muppet season , we cling on in hope something might happen but nothing happens.

Cmon José ,just tell the world you have been in contact with the club, u big gobshite!
Loads of reliable sources have come forward and said it's done, plus @Acquire Me is putting his Caf account on the line and is saying it's done. So chill, it probably is, no point announcing it now and potentially derailing our season as we make a push for top 4 while City stumble.
 
If we wanted Moyes as a long staying Manager, where does that leave Giggsy as the one after that? A 10 year apprenticeship?

I imagine if Moyes had been a long term success, then they wouldn't have cared so much about Giggs taking over
 
It is also ridiculous to say he doesn't know 1-0 victories are important. The Mourinho that many seem to want so badly has had a reputation of playing for 1-0 victories.

Mourinho is pragmatic and will at times accept a 1-0 win against a weak team OR if his own team is going through a weak spell. Any top manager will take this view.

However, in the case of LVG, EVERY game we play, he sets up a tactic which enables us to score 1 or 0 goals. Whether we play Sunderland Or MCFC or LCFC - 1 goal is all we tend to score, if all goes according to plan
LVG counts on DDG not to concede a single goal and for us to get 3 points.
To back up my point, these are our last 7 game results:

PL W Man Utd 1:0 Everton 03 Apr 2016
PL W Man City 0:1 Man Utd 20 Mar 2016
EL D Man Utd 1:1 Liverpool 17 Mar 2016
FC D Man Utd 1:1 West Ham 13 Mar 2016
EL L Liverpool 2:0 Man Utd 10 Mar 2016
PL L West Brom 1:0 Man Utd 06 Mar 2016
PL W Man Utd 1:0 Watford 02 Mar 2016

Out of 7 games, we have scored 1 or 0 goals in 100% of them.
Now either this is a massive coincidence or LVG is planning this.
For people who say Jose plays for 1-0, please find me a 7 game run, under Jose, where his team scored 0 or 1 goal per game (as I did above).
 
Bonuses are paid if conditions are met, not assumed but then removed if conditions are failed, but his 'info' wasn't talking about bonuses, he was talking about termination clauses which are redundant and nonsensical in the final year of a fixed term contract.



There's zero percent chance of that happening. In fact I'm fairly sure it would be illegal.

You're proposing a clause whereby he would work for the bulk of the season and then have to refund his wages if we didn't make third, in essence then having worked for no pay.

Yea, no chance. The only clauses that make any sense in the final year of a fixed term contract are bonuses for winning stuff.

What I meant -- and thought I wrote (but perhaps didn't) -- was that LVG could quite legally have a clause in his contract that states that if he fails to meet XYZ criteria in his contract that he could be sacked before the end of his contract with that last year's compensation as provided in that contract being forfeited.

There's nothing in US law that would prohibit the enforceability of such a clause. No idea about the UK, of course.

We're not talking about clawing back what LVG has already been paid...only sacking him before the end of his contract with his future wages not paid to him. There should be nothing wrong with that at all in the UK. A clawback provision would be legally out of order.

And why wouldn't United lawyers insist on such a provision (future wages, not past wages) in his contract? I certainly would, especially in light of what happened with Moyes and it is believed that a similar clause was in Moyes's contract.

All that said, even if United sacked LVG at the end of the season they'd only be saving one's year of his wages if they did activate such a clause. It's believed that LVG earns 7.3m annually and if the club had to eat that cost as the price of sacking him early and going with Jose, it would be a blip on the radar.
 
What I meant -- and thought I wrote (but perhaps didn't) -- was that LVG could quite legally have a clause in his contract that states that if he fails to meet XYZ criteria in his contract that he could be sacked before the end of his contract with that last year's compensation as provided in that contract being forfeited.

There's nothing in US law that would prohibit the enforceability of such a clause. No idea about the UK, of course.

We're not talking about clawing back what LVG has already been paid...only sacking him before the end of his contract with his future wages not paid to him. There should be nothing wrong with that at all in the UK. A clawback provision would be legally out of order.

And why wouldn't United lawyers insist on such a provision (future wages, not past wages) in his contract? I certainly would, especially in light of what happened with Moyes and it is believed that a similar clause was in Moyes's contract.

All that said, even if United sacked LVG at the end of the season they'd only be saving one's year of his wages if they did activate such a clause. It's believed that LVG earns 7.3m annually and if the club had to eat that cost as the price of sacking him early and going with Jose, it would be a blip on the radar.
:confused:

The whole point is that it's the final year of his contact, and the only time at which you'd know he'd failed to meet these targets is at the end of the season, by which time he's already been paid his final years salary, or at least the vast majority of it by the time it's shown to be mathematically impossible to achieve those targets.

Thus the clause makes no sense. You're essentially saying you can fire someone a month before their contract is already due to expire.

The only way could take that final years salary off him in to have him repay it.
 
:confused:

The whole point is that it's the final year of his contact, and the only time at which you'd know he'd failed to meet these targets is at the end of the season, by which time he's already been paid his final years salary, or at least the vast majority of it by the time it's shown to be mathematically impossible to achieve those targets.

Thus the clause makes no sense. You're essentially saying you can fire someone a month before their contract is already due to expire.

The only way could take that final years salary off him in to have him repay it.

Players and managers have bonuses like ending in the top 4, ending in the top 2, reaching the CL QF, those bonuses are paid at the end of the season. I don't believe in the ITK but that part can make sense.
 
Players and managers have bonuses like ending in the top 4, ending in the top 2, reaching the CL QF, those bonuses are paid at the end of the season. I don't believe in the ITK but that part can make sense.
Yea I know that, I don't have a problem with bonus clauses, it's the termination clause in the final year that makes no sense.
 
Yea I know that, I don't have a problem with bonus clauses, it's the termination clause in the final year that makes no sense.

Technically it's not a termination clause and if I'm not mistaken LVG said that he had the possibility to continue, maybe it is an unilateral clause in his contract or an automatic clause, if he reaches the goals he is automatically renewed.
 
Technically it's not a termination clause and if I'm not mistaken LVG said that he had the possibility to continue, maybe it is an unilateral clause in his contract or an automatic clause, if he reaches the goals he is automatically renewed.
The original guff was
His final year contract states that he must either win the league or CL.

If these conditions are not met then he will be sacked and his contract doesn't have to be paid off in full.

And Spock has been talking about sacking him and not having to pay the final year of his contract.

That's termination, and nothing to do with bonuses, and makes zero sense in the final year of a deal.

As for automatic extension, that's something that I would be hugely surprised about and also think we'd have heard something about it.
 
The original guff was


And Spock has been talking about sacking him and not having to pay the final year of his contract.

That's termination, and nothing to do with bonuses, and makes zero sense in the final year of a deal.

As for automatic extension, that's something that I would be hugely surprised about and also think we'd have heard something about it.


Yeah I missed the sacking part, I was still on the original post, we don't have to sack him at the end of his final year, we could though.
 
It's looks like we are heading for another year of boring football which would then be probably followed by the same philosophy (the united so called way) that brought valencia on its knees
 
We can learn from when Woody sacked our previous manager. After Moyes failed to finish top four he was sacked with a one year salary compensation. With that in mind isn't it logic to think that we gave LvG a similar set up on his contract. Top four on his first season to continue. Top three or winning a cup the second season and if he wins the league in his third season he will receive a hefty bonus. I would be surprised if there wasn't a result related clause after the Moyes debacle.

I think this is a possible reason why we have contacted Mou and set up a pre contract. We need to cover our basis if we finish outside top four. (three)
 
As I'm not massively in favour of Jose managing United, I'm going to have a little chuckle to myself when this thread becomes another legendary muppet thread along with Thiago, Benzema, Ramos et al.
It will have the same outcome, too.
 
"An agent working for the Portuguese is looking for a suitable property in Cheshire."

That's it, that's the sum total of the story. The Sun says it so it must be true.
 
This thread is becoming like the Vidal thread lets hope it doesn't end the same way.
 
I come here every day, hoping for news. I fully expect LVG to be our manager next season, regardless of results, but I'd love to see something other than conjecture regarding Mourinho!
 
This thread is becoming like the Vidal thread lets hope it doesn't end the same way.

There's a lot less variables with this tbf. If I remember rightly Vidal confirmed we'd made an offer, hence the rumours, but he just decided to go elsewhere. With Mourinho it appears that if we want him he's ours.
 
Last edited:
The "Jose to Madrid" stories were inevitable. Whats clear is the press in this country just do not have a clue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.