BBC: United hold talks with Mourinho

Would you be happy to see Jose Mourinho become next United manager?


  • Total voters
    1,749
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope you're info is more concrete than the 'pre-contract' claims:D Don't like hearing we have the option of pulling out. I like LVG personally, but he's been too inconsistent, so I hope the board take that into consideration..

To be fair, I know he has signed and I know its he who will be our new manager. The details about a pre contract is not something I know anything about.
 
It's obvious LVG will stay until the end of this season. Even if we get 4th he wil still leave

Then it's time for mourinho
 
To be fair, I know he has signed and I know its he who will be our new manager. The details about a pre contract is not something I know anything about.

Are you actually Mourinho? Your name is 'acquire me'...
 
There's too much smoke in the Mourinho to United speculation for there not to be a fire. We have the reports from the BBC about talks which spawned this thread, the comments from Moratti, Di Marzio who many claim is a reputable journalist who essentially guarantees it's happening and now these latest reports about the pre contract. There seems to be an air of inevitability to it like Pep to city a few months ago before that was confirmed.
 
But how could Manchester United get themselves into this confused beggary situation, where they might end up paying 15 million pounds for an asset they never acquire? It's madness, demonstrating a complete lack of pride and basic nous.
You seriously believe the Glazers would allow such a clause? Come on I thought you were smarter than that
 
City announced Guardiola as their next manager and their season has gone to pot ever since.

United have refused to confirm or deny anything about Mourinho, so our players are still playing for their futures.

That difference is a big part of what won us the game today. City have lost all focus in recent weeks. They should have wrapped the league up ages ago.
 
I personally think he's always been after the United job as well, i think he would have taken it in 2013 if offered it.

I'm sure he wanted the job. But it's possible he's already given his word to Chelsea or something. Maybe even signed a Pre contract that required HIM to pay 15m pounds if the deal was broken. ;)
 
City announced Guardiola as their next manager and their season has gone to pot ever since.

City had issues well before the announcement, they haven't won two league games in a row since September. The spine of the team is getting weaker with Kompany's injuries and Toure's age, while the new players they got haven't been able to take over yet - Sterling, De Bruyne who's injured, Otamendi.

I think it's an easy excuse to say a team isn't doing as well because they know the manager will be leaving. If they want to stay, shouldn't they make an extra effort, assuming Pep is looking at them? And forget the old/new manager, don't they want to win games and win trophies?
 
City had issues well before the announcement, they haven't won two league games in a row since September. The spine of the team is getting weaker with Kompany's injuries and Toure's age, while the new players they got haven't been able to take over yet - Sterling, De Bruyne who's injured, Otamendi.

I think it's an easy excuse to say a team isn't doing as well because they know the manager will be leaving. If they want to stay, shouldn't they make an extra effort, assuming Pep is looking at them? And forget the old/new manager, don't they want to win games and win trophies?
United's season suffered when Fergie announced his retirement first time around. The second time, he waited till we had the title more or less in the bag. Player psychologies aren't always that logically determined.
 
Manchester United refuse to comment on Mourinho contract reports

Manchester United would not comment on Sunday on reports that JoseMourinho has signed a pre-contract to take over as manager in place of Louis van Gaal at the end of the season.

A club official told Reuters they would be making no response to the story in Spanish newspaper El Pais which cited sources close to former Chelsea manager Mourinho.

The Portuguese, who also managed Real Madrid and Inter Milan, has been persistently linked in the media with the Old Trafford job since departing Stamford Bridge for the second time in December.

United, who are sixth in the Premier League, face fourth-placed Manchester City later on Sunday needing a result to boost their chances of qualifying for the Champions League.

Under the terms of the agreement - which was apparently agreed back in February - El Pais reported that United would have to pay Mourinho £5 million if they did not offer him a full contract by May 1 and another £10 million if they failed to give him the job by June 1.

Van Gaal signed a three-year contract in May 2014 but is not expected to see out the deal with fans unhappy with the style of play and poor results.

The report, which cited a source with links to the company run by Mourinho's agent Jorge Mendes, said United wanted a flexible deal because of a split in the Old Trafford board as to whether the 53-year-old was the right choice for the club.

OUR VIEW
It'd be the easiest thing in the world to deny that there is anything in this story, and United have denied speculation in the past. So this non-denial will be taken as a confirmation by fans; depending on how Sunday's Manchester derby goes, it might get a proper confirmation sooner rather than later.

Two other things make us think that the original story has to be true, incidentally. Firstly, El Pais is far and away the most reputable newspaper in Spain, and rarely touches the rampant speculation about transfers and managers that the likes of Marca and Sport trade in. Secondly, this all sounds such a bizarre set-up that it's hard to imagine how it could have been invented. The odd situation is apparently down to Bobby Charlton and Alex Ferguson being unsure about Mourinho being the right man for Old Trafford.
http://www.eurosport.com/football/p...act-in-february-report_sto5325784/story.shtml
 
City announced Guardiola as their next manager and their season has gone to pot ever since.

United have refused to confirm or deny anything about Mourinho, so our players are still playing for their futures.

My thoughts on this exactly but I think its more an agreement between Woodward and LVG on whats the best approach to see out the season before LVG goes.
 
I'm sure he wanted the job. But it's possible he's already given his word to Chelsea or something. Maybe even signed a Pre contract that required HIM to pay 15m pounds if the deal was broken. ;)

It's possible sure but i reckon Fergie might have told Mourinho he was retiring half way through 2012-13, but maybe didn't tell him Moyes was going to replace him.
 
Sounds like we're giving LvG the dignity to finish up the year irrespective of results, with the knowledge that Jose is joining in the summer. Otherwise, there is no way we would be allowed to languish outside the top 4.
 
United's season suffered when Fergie announced his retirement first time around. The second time, he waited till we had the title more or less in the bag. Player psychologies aren't always that logically determined.

I agree with the last statement. But I don't believe United's issues had anything to do with Fergie's retirement. Selling Stam, trying to find a spot for Veron and moving Scholes to a different role while trying to play 4-5-1 were the real problems. Once we got back to 4-4-2 with Ruud and Ole upfront, everything changed.
 
will be interesting what Giggs role will be under Jose.
Hopefully he leaves with van Gaal. As part of 2 failed management systems he needs to go and ply his trade somewhere rather than hanging around again.
 
I don't mind Giggs staying on and tbh working under Mourinho would only add to his growing experience in management, not sure the Moyes approach of getting rid of everyone was a good idea and same applies if Jose comes in
 
I'd like Giggs to stay on as a coach regardless of who is in charge.
 
I don't mind Giggs staying on and tbh working under Mourinho would only add to his growing experience in management, not sure the Moyes approach of getting rid of everyone was a good idea and same applies if Jose comes in
Jose wouldn't bring in a bunch of second raters to be fair.
 
If it is true that there are penalty clauses if we don't sign Mourinho, I hope we too have asked him about his plans for our youngsters and kept our conditions on table. As much I love Mou, I won't like careers of likes of Rashford hampered as cost of signing Mourinho.
Rashford has just made one of the most experienced defences in the Premier League look foolish. I imagine he'd have a future under Mourinho.

The ones who might be vulnerable would be the less obviously talented ones, notably Lingard, McNair and Wilson. But are they really likely to make it at United anyway?

I totally agree with what you're saying btw. The only good thing we've seen from LVG is the promotion of young players, and it would be bonkers to waste that. I don't think Mourinho will do that though, provided the players are good enough.
 
City announced Guardiola as their next manager and their season has gone to pot ever since.

United have refused to confirm or deny anything about Mourinho, so our players are still playing for their futures.

That difference is a big part of what won us the game today. City have lost all focus in recent weeks. They should have wrapped the league up ages ago.
Exactly, City's season has been a disaster and they must be ruing the decision to announce the appointment of Guardiola. Hilarious really, I bet they were beside themselves with glee when they did it, thinking about how gutted United would be.
 
I don't mind Giggs staying on and tbh working under Mourinho would only add to his growing experience in management, not sure the Moyes approach of getting rid of everyone was a good idea and same applies if Jose comes in

It didn't work for Moyes because he got rid of a winning and settled coaching staff for a bunch of nobodies like Round and Neville with little or no experience at the top level. Oh and also for some reason Jimmy Lumsden who i'm still convinced didn't actually do anything.

Jose would only be replacing a failed set-up.

Giggs needs to either give up on wanting to be United manager and become a youth coach at United or something or go somewhere else and prove himself as a manager in his own right. Ridiculous that he would even be considered for the United job having never even been an actual manager.
 
Rashford has just made one of the most experienced defences in the Premier League look foolish. I imagine he'd have a future under Mourinho.

The ones who might be vulnerable would be the less obviously talented ones, notably Lingard, McNair and Wilson. But are they really likely to make it at United anyway?

I totally agree with what you're saying btw. The only good thing we've seen from LVG is the promotion of young players, and it would be bonkers to waste that. I don't think Mourinho will do that though, provided the players are good enough.

Sorry, but i just have to ask how you can say Wilson is less talented?

The guy is lethal and have a fantastic drive with the ball. Him being out on loan doesn't mean he is less talented than Rashford.
 
I think Mourinho won't have a problem playing some of the younger players who have been stepping up this season. I think he won't really have a problem if they have already shown their worth, which some have. I think the main thing he wouldn't do that Van Gaal has done is actually give young players their very first chance.
 
Out of interest how many players do you all think Mourinho needs to bring in to get United competing for the league next year? No doubt he'll have a good amount of money available to spend.
 
Yeah, I'd rather Giggs went into a different role at United under Jose, but he might think that's beneath him now. Best would be to leave and prove himself, but I imagine he's scared of making a mess of it and blowing his chances at managing United one day.

Out of interest how many players do you all think Mourinho needs to bring in to get United competing for the league next year? No doubt he'll have a good amount of money available to spend.

This has been done to death and the general consensus seems to be 3-4, not including if DDG goes.
 
I think Mourinho won't have a problem playing some of the younger players who have been stepping up this season. I think he won't really have a problem if they have already shown their worth, which some have. I think the main thing he wouldn't do that Van Gaal has done is actually give young players their very first chance.

Completely agree with this.

To be fair to LVG he's done the hard part which is stick his neck out to give all these lads a chance. Mourinho won't go out of his way to end United careers for players like Rashford Varela Lingard and others, because what he has there are ready made back up players allowing him to spend his budget on essential first team players.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.