.Rossi
ever get that feeling of déjà vu?
What does he gain from lying about that?
No idea but, as much as I love the guy, he's come out with some right porkies over the years. Some that just make you smile
What does he gain from lying about that?
if those pointers are true, who else realisticly is there to be at loggerheads? So its a tug of war with Jose/Giggs, hence the strong opinions of Yorke this week saying Jose is too old and its a young mans game now
Dwight "Moyes is the right man" Yorke
Did Yorke really say Jose is too old and Moyes was the right man?
He is going to sink villa right into the 2nd division with the that horseshit judgement.
Mourinho is the only single possible ray of light surrounding the darkness that is United's current situation.
We are in an absolute state. Thank feck Mourinho is out there, willing and able to fix our pathetic squad.
This power struggle reported is what red issue said a while back yeah?
Anyway I actually believe fergie has a problem with him. Just too many things add up and it is becoming obvious tbh. He would have replaced fergie had fergie thought so high of him for sure... And when mourinho was on the brink of being sacked by Chelsea this time, it was fergie that tried persuading roman it would be a mistake to let him go.
Now why the feck would he do that if potentially we can profit from it? Because it puts a spanner in giggs taking over that's why.
Yep. He also said Mourinho WAS a great a manager but, now it's Giggs' time
He also backed Moyes quite a bit. Old boys club and all that
Even though I am Trinidadian it is seriously hard to support yorkie sometimes.
This power struggle reported is what red issue said a while back yeah?
Anyway I actually believe fergie has a problem with him. Just too many things add up and it is becoming obvious tbh. He would have replaced fergie had fergie thought so high of him for sure... And when mourinho was on the brink of being sacked by Chelsea this time, it was fergie that tried persuading roman it would be a mistake to let him go.
Now why the feck would he do that if potentially we can profit from it? Because it puts a spanner in giggs taking over that's why.
This power struggle reported is what red issue said a while back yeah?
Anyway I actually believe fergie has a problem with him. Just too many things add up and it is becoming obvious tbh. He would have replaced fergie had fergie thought so high of him for sure... And when mourinho was on the brink of being sacked by Chelsea this time, it was fergie that tried persuading roman it would be a mistake to let him go.
Now why the feck would he do that if potentially we can profit from it? Because it puts a spanner in giggs taking over that's why.
This
Not his fault I don't think.
It's all a bit odd/weird how Robson, Yorke, Vidic, Scholes, Savage and someone else, all came out talking Giggs up as the next manager this week. Very peculiar
I find all of that bizarre and therefore hard to believe. Why would we essentially pay a manager to be on hold until we confirm there's no one better out there? Just sounds ridiculous all round.
Aren't those the two who were behind Moyes....they chose Moyes, who had never won anything instead of Jose who had won it all numerous times in a critical point in our clubs history and the sequence of events after that led us into the predicament we are in today. That is being out of the champions league 2 out of 3 years and the team in shambles.
But does SAF honestly feel that giggs is the man to take over and lead our club against the likes of ponch, pep, klopp, Arsene and conte?!
That's the type of logic he used when he thought Valencia could replace Ronaldo....surely he has lost it if that is the case. It's the blind leading the blind in the boardroom these days
I will never understand this, even if he is trying to get some sort of influence on the pitch, doesn't he realize what is at stake and Jose is a proven winner? Does he not care about the club?
Not his fault I don't think.
It's all a bit odd/weird how Robson, Yorke, Vidic, Scholes, Savage and someone else, all came out talking Giggs up as the next manager this week. Very peculiar
They (Fergie/Charlton) are not done yet.
This time, they want to bring in a manager who has never managed before. A rookie. A trainee.
Something tells me that Fergie wants to appoint people over whom he can have influence.
I honestly think that with the likes of Moyes and Giggs/Class of 92 at the club, Fergie would have retained a lot of control and power. Those people look up to him. They'd be asking for his help, advice and directions on a constant basis.
With Mourinho, Klopp, Guardiola etc, they are not going to want Fergie sticking his nose in. They are their own men, so Fergie inevitably would lose some sort of control/power. The amount of ex players coming out this week beating the Giggs drum was baffling. There has to be something behind that. All of them Fergie's boys and one of Giggsy's mates. The timing of it too was awful.
If, and I mean if, it's all true, I can understand Fergie not wanting to lose control. It must be difficult to let go but, we're just repeating the mistakes of 46 years ago. Charlton however, I don't know what he's on about. The behaviour of certain ex managers and certain ex players has been just as bad as Mourinho.
I know SAF has an ego and that's ok, but if all this is true then he values his ego over the well being of the club and I find that so disappointing, I always thought he put the club first.
Imagine winning at Anfield under Mourinho and this happening
Not always........
As for LvG, Giggs was/is still there. No one thought LvG would be a failure so Giggs being handed the job after 3 years was gonna happen
Not his fault I don't think.
It's all a bit odd/weird how Robson, Yorke, Vidic, Scholes, Savage and someone else, all came out talking Giggs up as the next manager this week. Very peculiar
?
Did anyone bother reading the Vidic article? He said Mourinho would be a great choice also.
He was giving his first interview after retirement.
So how did he [Fergie] feel when LVG was appointed? I doubt LVG ever asked him for advise and I don't think he has any influence over him either.
Imagine winning at Anfield under Mourinho and this happening
I think that's more likely to happen against Guardiola's MCFC.
Jose will be thinking to himself, "this time Pep, you don't have the best player in history in your team".
In fact, after the last few years, nobody actually know what Giggs does, apart from stand by, while LVG hangs himself. I mean does Giggs not offer LVG any advice? And if he does, the fact that we are still sinking, should deter us from putting this guy in charge.
I think that's more likely to happen against Guardiola's MCFC.
Jose will be thinking to himself, "this time Pep, you don't have the best player in history in your team".
Seems the Beeb have it on their gossip column now.
Just confirmation of the tweet posted by @Summit a couple of pages back
Also worth noting that El Pais is one of Spain's heavyweight papers and is a general newspaper rather than a sports rag like Marca or Mundo Deportivo. They wouldn't go to the wall with this story unless there was good reason, methinks.not sure if posted so:
http://www.theguardian.com/football...nchester-united-pre-contract?CMP=share_btn_tw
Not sure what to think to be honest....not the biggest fan even though i rate him very highly(top 3 or 5) but we fecked it up so he is probably our only good option left.
Up to today, the fact that he chose Moyes over Jose still haunts the club.
When you line up their CV's side by side it is shocking to a ludicrous point. You would think he would have learned his lesson.
As long as it's not for possession I couldn't give a toss.
This power struggle reported is what red issue said a while back yeah?
Anyway I actually believe fergie has a problem with him. Just too many things add up and it is becoming obvious tbh. He would have replaced fergie had fergie thought so high of him for sure... And when mourinho was on the brink of being sacked by Chelsea this time, it was fergie that tried persuading roman it would be a mistake to let him go.
Now why the feck would he do that if potentially we can profit from it? Because it puts a spanner in giggs taking over that's why.