Equally, perhaps you could make just as convincing a case for someone like Pochettino. From the outside he fits much more closely with the ideals and style of football we're used to.
This was a really interesting post and apologies for just quoting a single extract but I've read this numerous times on here and am genuinely interested how Pochettino's style is in any way similar to United under Fergie.
At both Southampton and Spurs, Pochettino has played a possession centric style with lots of technical midfield players. The style is closer to United under Van Gaal than Fergie.
When Queiroz was at United they moved to a slightly more possession based game, when they replaced a striker with Veron and moved Scholes to number 10. It wasn't a successful move for numerous reasons.
During the latter years under Fergie, United had very few midfield options and Carrick's partners entered and exited through a revolving door. United's midfield was so weak that in big games they couldn't play their normal system and had to bolster the midfield with Phil Jones or Park which blunted their attacking options. It was certainly not a team that was composed in possession.
United under Fergie was all about forwards and quality attacking players, often ending with 4 strikers on the pitch. Spurs under Pochettino have one striker at the club.
My long winded point here is that Jose Mourinho is the closest manager to Fergie currently in world football. What United has lacked most of all since Fergie left is a winning mentality. Where Spurs throw away a 2-1 lead at home to 10 man Arsenal in a key title decider, Mourinho teams don't do that.
No chance. He has made the squad younger even before the injuries so that Is a ridiculous assumption. You will see mourinho's match winning game plan with flashes of possession football already ingrained in to players heads. Enjoy
Give it a rest. Your original tune was that LVG was laying foundations for a possession based successor (Guardiola). Everybody but your genius self failed to notice this obvious long term plan being hatched. There was no way United would appoint Mourinho because he would ruin all of LVG's possession based foundations.
Now, all of a sudden, playing a completely different style these foundations will benefit Mourinho?
Or could it possibly be that LVG was appointed to win titles and transition an already successful side to his successor and he just did a really bad job at it?