If there are 38 games per team per season, and maybe 2 or 3 controversial plays per game as average per game and you cover a total of (let's say) 10 seasons, that means you can you can easily show videos where you can pick a huge amount of plays that point at your direction.
Consider 2 teams, and increment the number of tournaments (not just the league) and there is even more cherry picking you can do.
Do the math.
The fact you believe you are proving something by showing a few plays in here shows a huge deal of naivety.
To know what really happened, you must analyze everything. If you don't see the matches how can you argue your opinion?.
I've put in pictures 10 goals in offside of Real Madrid that year. That's not a few plays.
And I put 3 actions against Barcelona that if Messi gets the penalty against Villarreal would be 6 points more.
Real Madrid finished with 93 points and Barcelona with 90 and the goal average in favor. It is not even necessary to analyze the plays of Madrid, only with those of Barcelona would already be champion.
I also put the goal wrongly disallowed to Messi against Atletico Madrid that would give the league to Barcelona.
Here the only ones who do not want to analyze those plays are several of the fans of Real Madrid.
You have simply taken a statistic favorable to your narrative in a short period of time. Not even during the years that the payment to that person.
I can also take this year's statistic and make a narrative. For example:
- Only one penalty in favor of Barça in the last 41 matches.
And now the conspiracy theory "
UEFA hurts Barcelona because they are in the super league."
Look how easy, take a statistic and invent a narrative and then put a couple of plays where they harm Barcelona.
- FC Barcelona has only shot once from penalty this season by 15 of Madrid, 10 of them in La Liga.
And I put the narrative I want. And I refuse to see what other users put me is not going to be that they throw me all down.