Swordsman
Full Member
People just need to accept the simple fact that the best player of the year will never be objectively measured. It will always be subjective, it's not mathematics.
Messi is far from being an Angel as many people claimed.Agree, Ronaldo is and forevermore will be a massive twat but don't forget Messi here too. His hand on the neck antics have been given a pass for too long. Ask South American players what they think of him as a person and you'd be surprised
Spain's captain at the Euros was Alvaro Morata.That's because he won it mainly for captaining Spain at the Euros.
It's as simple as that tbh.People just need to accept the simple fact that the best player of the year will never be objectively measured. It will always be subjective, it's not mathematics.
Vini was the UCL POTY , and the 2nd best in LA Liga. Rodri wasn't even in the Best XI of the EPL and wasn't in the UCL best XI. In neither of them. He isn't even the best, or 2nd best player of Man City (De Bruyne and Haaland). Does he deserve it, really?And he has a strong claim no? Vini wasn't La Liga's POTY (it was Bellingham) and he didn't play well at the Copa America too. Rodri won the best player at the Euros and was pivotal for his club too. Seems fair, great to see a midfielder win it.
...how do you support that pit of a "club"?!?!What 'victim' antics? Are you talking about him being the victim of racial abuse? If so, then that's a horrendous take.
Rodri is only 8 years younger than Busquets, there is no grand difference in the average quality of players. Everyone 8 years ago was a legend and everyone now is no good, is it?Rodri finishing high in the Ballon D'Or voting is a function of there being few good players around now, not his quality. Busquets was the better footballer.
Rodri was definitely in the PL best 11 of the seasonVini was the UCL POTY , and the 2nd best in LA Liga. Rodri wasn't even in the Best XI of the EPL and wasn't in the UCL best XI. In neither of them. He isn't even the best, or 2nd best player of Man City (De Bruyne and Haaland). Does he deserve it, really?
Vini was the UCL POTY , and the 2nd best in LA Liga. Rodri wasn't even in the Best XI of the EPL and wasn't in the UCL best XI. In neither of them. He isn't even the best, or 2nd best player of Man City (De Bruyne and Haaland). Does he deserve it, really?
One thing is for sure, when Rodri arrived at Man City and when Vini arrived at Madrid, no one could have foreseen they'd develop into the players they've become. Specially Vini I have to say
It’s annoying how City replaced Fernandinho, who was a very good midfielder too, with someone much better. We never replaced any of our Fergie players properly.One thing is for sure, when Rodri arrived at Man City and when Vini arrived at Madrid, no one could have foreseen they'd develop into the players they've become. Specially Vini I have to say
Vini was actually a very exciting talent when he joined Madrid and there were lots of Neymar comparisons already. I think after two years or so, at the time Benzema told his team mates not to pass to him anymore, was when nobody would have anticipated that. But Madrid always saw Ballon D'Or potential in him, I think.
I was talking about how the general public perceived them before. I could be wrong but at the time it seemed like Koke was the better midfielder at Atleti. Vini was very raw and clumsy a few years ago.Vini was actually a very exciting talent when he joined Madrid and there were lots of Neymar comparisons already. I think after two years or so, at the time Benzema told his team mates not to pass to him anymore, was when nobody would have anticipated that. But Madrid always saw Ballon D'Or potential in him, I think.
Yeah, he was very clumsy but that only showed when he was playing in La Liga. I remember that there were many videos of him doing incredible tricks in the Brazilian league, comparable to Endrick and Estevao just recently and a little bit like Neymar before him, just not as much hype.I was talking about how the general public perceived them before. I could be wrong but at the time it seemed like Koke was the better midfielder at Atleti. Vini was very raw and clumsy a few years ago.
Incredible development
You don't think Xabi Alonso should have won it?Just saw that Ancelotti was awarded with the coach of the year prize. It would have made much more sense to give the Ballon D'Or to Vinicius (the outstanding individual in a team that doesn't really have a distinctive playing style) and the coach of the year to Fuentes (the coach of a team that convinced with a strong collective and an amazing playing style). Instead you gave the coach of the year to the coach who was carried by his players and the prize for individual brillance a player that rarely produces magic and thrives in functioning collectives.
I think Xabi should have gotten it. Then again, these awards are bit of a popularity contest, but what Alonso did with Leverkusen is Fergusonesque. Unforgettable season for him and the clubYou don't think Xabi Alonso should have won it?
Uh, no he wouldn't. Rodri has better PR, but he is is not a better footballer than Busquets. Busquets was/is very technical. Which is not to say that Rodri is not, but he isn't to the same degree.Rodri is only 8 years younger than Busquets, there is no grand difference in the average quality of players. Everyone 8 years ago was a legend and everyone now is no good, is it?
Rodri may not have won it in Messi/Ronaldo era but he would have finished top 5 no problem based on his performances in the past few seasons.
The issue is you think only Busquets' cute little turns and dragbacks are technique.Uh, no he wouldn't. Rodri has better PR, but he is is not a better footballer than Busquets. Busquets was very technical. Which is not to say that Rodri is not, but he isn't to the same degree.
If Kolo Muani scored, it would have been Mbappe easily. Hattrick in the world cup final and great stats all year round.Balon D'Or is given way more importance than it deserve. I wish Vini and RM reaction was different and they did not give it so much importance.
I feel the thing got blown out of proportion during the Ronaldo/Messi era as it played a big role in their rivalry. I do not remember in earlier era that people cared that much about it.
It's going to be subjective trophy. Everyone has their own favorite. So many time one player has won the trophy while someone else deserved it more.
Messi won it for winning WC. If Kolu Muani had scored in 118 minute it would have been Haaland.
The trophies you win on the pitch are much more important. I hope it motivate RM players because at the moment they are playing like a bag of shit.
You don't think Xabi Alonso should have won it?
And it would have been a travesty.If Kolo Muani scored, it would have been Mbappe easily. Hattrick in the world cup final and great stats all year round.
Well my point was someone else would win it.If Kolo Muani scored, it would have been Mbappe easily. Hattrick in the world cup final and great stats all year round.
Rodri has better PR is bullshit, he’s a defensive midfielder for City who nobody really cares about vs a Barcelona legend. There has been nobody cheering on Rodri or hyping him up in his career whatsoever, all credit has been hard earned.Uh, no he wouldn't. Rodri has better PR, but he is is not a better footballer than Busquets. Busquets was/is very technical. Which is not to say that Rodri is not, but he isn't to the same degree.
James Ward-Prowse 14 goal contributions in the league, a CM.Rodri 17 goal contributions in the league, A DM.
Vini 20 goal contributions in the league, a winger.
Not dumb just leaving out the trophies and absolute monster value to the team/national squad.James Ward-Prowse 14 goal contributions in the league, a CM.
Lamine Yamal 10 goal contributions in the league, a winger.
Do you see how dumb that looks? There are plenty of examples like this. It doesn't mean anything at all.
Lamine isn't getting Ballon d or shouts. He just emerged last season. He's ranked pretty high mostly because of his amazing Euro campaign.James Ward-Prowse 14 goal contributions in the league, a CM.
Lamine Yamal 10 goal contributions in the league, a winger.
Do you see how dumb that looks? There are plenty of examples like this. It doesn't mean anything at all.
The Premier League has been cheering him on and hyping him up and you've clearly bought it completely.Rodri has better PR is bullshit, he’s a defensive midfielder for City who nobody really cares about vs a Barcelona legend. There has been nobody cheering on Rodri or hyping him up in his career whatsoever, all credit has been hard earned.
Rodri was second best player in the PL for average rating on WhoScored last season for example from DM which is rare, and best in Europe on SofaScore with an average rating of 7.62 per game. That’s a higher rating than Busquets ever got, he peaked at 7.41 in 11/12.
Uh, no he wouldn't. Rodri has better PR, but he is is not a better footballer than Busquets. Busquets was/is very technical. Which is not to say that Rodri is not, but he isn't to the same degree.