Welsh Wonder
A dribbling mess on the sauce
He's having none of mine! My preciousss.His supplier is @Welsh Wonder so the answer is a hell of a lot!
He's having none of mine! My preciousss.His supplier is @Welsh Wonder so the answer is a hell of a lot!
Was at 20/1 minutes before race on Sky. Put a quid each on him and Blake.Could of got the villain at 25-33/1......thought they were ridiculous odds too. Oh well.
Victoroids.
Yeah, was close but you could see Coleman nicked it on the dip.Bolt was clearly ahead of Coleman on the replay, did he get unlucky on the stretch?
Send him to Everton more likeSign him up Woody!
Bolt has never had a great start though, but yeah this one was awful.Bolt can't start anymore that's why he lost.
Bolt has never had a great start though, but yeah this one was awful.
Nah. Pace on the flanks and I doubr he'd be much worse in crossing than our wide playersSend him to Everton more like
Ooo, you're such an edgy contrarian!Awesome that Gatlin won, nice shut the feck up for lovely audience.
Bitter sweet (and sad for Bolt) but reasonably happy for Gatlin, as obviously his hard work paid off finally and becomes the only one to beat him in a World or Olympics Final.
Looking at them 2007 results just makes me think about what a legendary underachiever Asafa was. Obscene record for most under 10 runs though to be fair....but that big stage, poor lad, couldn't get over the hump.
Aye, I'd say he was more talented than a few others who've won the 100m in the Olympics or WCs over the years. For a few years he could churn out 9.7 or 9.8 runs with unerring regularity. He probably lost the gold in 2004 over nerves, but after that it was more so down to a lack of repeated speed endurance and an inability to tolerate four races in just over 24 hours.Looking at them 2007 results just makes me think about what a legendary underachiever Asafa was. Obscene record for most under 10 runs though to be fair....but that big stage, poor lad, couldn't get over the hump.
Probably the latter. But it's a generational thing as well - Bolt, Powell, Gay and Gatlin were all responsible for the majority of the fast times over the last 10-15 years - and they're all at the end of the road. Perhaps a talent gap to the next generation, but you could see someone like Coleman picking up the baton and hitting 9.7 soon enough.Why's everyone back to running 9.9x?
Gatlin and Bolt because they're declining.. are there no new sprinters?
I suppose Andre De Grasse wouldve won easily if he'd run?
Why's Blake not running the sub 9.8 he was previously doing fairly easily?
Or has drug testing just become better?
Gatlin, despite everything, has more longevity than Bolt. It's odd, but defo the right time for Bolt to retire as a goat.Why's everyone back to running 9.9x?
Gatlin and Bolt because they're declining.. are there no new sprinters?
I suppose Andre De Grasse wouldve won easily if he'd run?
Why's Blake not running the sub 9.8 he was previously doing fairly easily?
Or has drug testing just become better?
Why's everyone back to running 9.9x?
Gatlin and Bolt because they're declining.. are there no new sprinters?
I suppose Andre De Grasse wouldve won easily if he'd run?
Why's Blake not running the sub 9.8 he was previously doing fairly easily?
Or has drug testing just become better?
Ooo, you're such an edgy contrarian!
Bolt probably got that bronze with what I would wildly assume was the most casual of training camps too with the two ahead probably training to obscene levels to just about beat him. Well past his peak but still could of got gold if he really cared about it(see last year....), but what an athlete, what a character, absolutely transcendent.
Why's everyone back to running 9.9x?
Gatlin and Bolt because they're declining.. are there no new sprinters?
I suppose Andre De Grasse wouldve won easily if he'd run?
Why's Blake not running the sub 9.8 he was previously doing fairly easily?
Or has drug testing just become better?
They work but not as much as people think, you can drug a donkey all you want, it won't make it a thoroughbred.
Actually I'd say the opposite. I think the effect is greater than most realize. You often see people suggesting Bolt was clean due to small improvements in time from when he was young, which suggests most people don't realize just how big a difference those small time improvements really impact things.
Here is a photo of when Ben Johnson annihilated the competition in 1988
In that race he only won by 0.13 seconds, yet look at the gap. He blew the opposition away.
So if an athlete is able to shave 0.3 seconds of their time due to drugs, then in real terms he is absolutely thrashing his "natural" self. You'd be more than doubling the distance between Johnson and Lewis. So these seemingly tiny differences are actually pretty huge.
I meant compared to himself not others.
My point is a drug using athlete would thrash himself without drugs. Just by saving 0.3 or 0.2 seconds of their time, it means they put a big gap between they achieve on drugs and not on drugs.