The Neviller
New Member
I'm not getting mixed up with anything. "Sky Sources" is basically what's in the papers. It's staggering that you don't grasp this.I honestly believe you are getting mixed up between their actual reporting and their transfer clockwatch. I am not like a little child. just because I am treating something like gospel doesn't make me a gullable lunatic. Sky report accurate information all the time. Are you seriously telling me if they have a story tomorrow saying ''Sky Sources believe Arturo Vidal is set for united medical tomorrow'' it will be just as reliable as the Daily Mail who have said it is done and off many times. If they said that, then the medical would take place. Because they provide correct information.
That's all I'll say mate. Not sure why you are so sceptical of a 100% trustworthy source. It's like you think actually believing something makes you 'a little child'
As has already been pointed out to you, they report two types of things "Sky Sources" which is basically what's in the open press and what everyone else is reporting. And "Breaking News", which is stuff that has been made official. That's what they report, and everything you see there will already be reported elsewhere. They're a news station, that's it. They report sports news. It's like you saying you only believe Sky News for what's happening in Gaza, when everything that's happened in Gaza will be reported elsewhere before (or at best at the same time) as it's reported on Sky News.
They don't break news, they report news that's already been broken. The only way you'll see a transfer story broken on Sky Sports News is if you're not on the Internet and are watching it exclusively, and by then everyone will know before you.