Deery
Dreary
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
- Messages
- 18,590
Something seems off with this transfer, why would you pay £72.5m for a player that doesn’t always start for Barca and you don’t really need..
No way.. he is not worth £72m
Something seems off with this transfer, why would you pay £72.5m for a player that doesn’t always start for Barca and you don’t really need..
Something seems off with this transfer, why would you pay £72.5m for a player that doesn’t always start for Barca and you don’t really need..
It's most probably creative accounting on part of Juventus and Barcelona now watch Barcelona move for Pjanic for around £55-60 m otherwise this deal probably won't happen.Something seems off with this transfer, why would you pay £72.5m for a player that doesn’t always start for Barca and you don’t really need..
Expect an inflated fee for Pjanic who will go the other way
Juve desperately need a new midfielder, their midfield has been subpar all season
Juve desperately need a new midfielder, their midfield has been subpar all season
Expect an inflated fee for Pjanic who will go the other way
Juve desperately need a new midfielder, their midfield has been subpar all season
Probably because they are getting a great deal. I fully expect a 30 year old Pjanic to go to Barca in the coming weeks for 40 odd million.
Juve will get a younger model they fancied, while not spending a lot of cash (which they hate doing)
Barcelona get short term cover and some much needed cash.
Of course, as always with current Barca, they aren’t thinking about the future and the age of their squad.
This will become more apparent when we get a daft combo of Dembele/Todibo/Umtiti/Coutinho for Neymar in the summer
You know something is up where Juve is involved and they still have Ramsey on £400k a week, does he stay or goIt's most probably creative accounting on part of Juventus and Barcelona now watch Barcelona move for Pjanic for around £55-60 m otherwise this deal probably won't happen.
You know something is up where Juve is involved and they still have Ramsey on £400k a week, does he stay or go
What’s the advantage of both clubs paying inflated fees? Surely if it’s an FFP loophole it doesn’t matter, it’s the net spend that counts.It's most probably creative accounting on part of Juventus and Barcelona now watch Barcelona move for Pjanic for around £55-60 m otherwise this deal probably won't happen.
Juve actually have a few midfielders
Pjanic, Bentencaur, Khedira, Ramsey, Rabiot, Matuidi.
I know 3 of them are 30+ but they got rid of Can as well.
Cheap and poor are not the same thing. Juve’s owners are filthy rich.They did get the players to waive 4 months of wages.
What’s the advantage of both clubs paying inflated fees? Surely if it’s an FFP loophole it doesn’t matter, it’s the net spend that counts.
What’s the advantage of both clubs paying inflated fees? Surely if it’s an FFP loophole it doesn’t matter, it’s the net spend that counts.
Ahh ok, that makes more sense. Cheers.It matters. I think transfer income will be counted in one go, whereas transfer spend will be divided by length of contract. Apart from that there is book value stuff.
Barca have a really weird transfer policy with players last 5 years.
I presume they're getting Pjanic in the deal so very's good but he is 30 so 2-3 good years and he'll need to be replaced like Rakitic, Griezmann, Suarez, Pigue, Alba..........and Messi.
Are they banking on La Masia hitting jackpot again around 2023? Feels to me like they really need to sort themselves out with sporting director as this sort of policy will massively weaken them in the post Messi era.
Junior Firpo is pretty much Alba's replacement. De Jong is also pretty much Rakitic's replacement. But still, they got lot of ageing players and those players are their key players. May be they think the money is good to sell Melo and going to use it as a fund to sign new players in attack, Pjanic could cost cheaper though.
Then it doesn't make sense to buy Pjanic. They could sell Arthur and use the money for Havertz, exemplarily. Except they are going for an attacking option instead of a midfielder, like Neymar. But I can't imagine that in the post-Corona market.
I won't be surprised if Pjanic is signed for a short term replacement for Busquets or rotation with him.
Forgive me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t Arthur supposed to be the Busquets rotation/replacement?I won't be surprised if Pjanic is signed for a short term replacement for Busquets or rotation with him.
Forgive me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t Arthur supposed to be the Busquets rotation/replacement?
De Jong to United, I sayThis is quite odd.
Pjanic, Busquets and De Jong are best in a holding role. Don't see why Barca would go for Pjanic.
Does sound like they are manipulating the market a little here.
I'd spectulate that the difference in transfer values between the two players is around £20 mil. They can essesntially do a deal for the pair and Juve pay £20mil for Arthur and Barce get Pjanic for free but that obvisouly lowers the values of the players. With all the talk about the diminshed value of players since Covid, it's in the best interests of the tops teams to attempt to retain the pre-pandemic tranfer values of their top assets.
If I'm not mistaken, according to IFRS, you can activate a tramsfer fee and then depreciate it over the course of the contract. Pjanic should already be depreciated while the 'asset' Arthur is probably also valued around 10m or something along those lines given that he was signed for around 30m I believe. So according the this, both teams would profit from the move on the balance sheet. That could allow them to get a better loan deal since the club is "healthier".
Theoretically, they could switch players back neyt season and still be richer than they were before. Very weird system.
I’d go all in on the short term if I had just a couple more years of Messi.Barca have a really weird transfer policy with players last 5 years.
I presume they're getting Pjanic in the deal so very's good but he is 30 so 2-3 good years and he'll need to be replaced like Rakitic, Griezmann, Suarez, Pigue, Alba..........and Messi.
Are they banking on La Masia hitting jackpot again around 2023? Feels to me like they really need to sort themselves out with sporting director as this sort of policy will massively weaken them in the post Messi era.
They bought Kulusevski, as well.De ligt, Bentancur, Arthur is starting to not to look too bad for Juventus.
If they manage to add a a few up an coming italian players like Tonali or Zaniolo - then they start to look pretty good.
Except the goalkeeper ofcourse.
They're all at a similar level, all of them decent but none of them have been elite. Pjanic can be but he's been off form for quite some time now, mostly because of the amount of games he has to play due to no credible alternative to his position.
Besides, Khedira is only fit for 5 games a year and Ramsey is only fit for half the season too so they actually have had some depth problems at times.
I’d go all in on the short term if I had just a couple more years of Messi.
Amuses me it's yet another season where this great Adrien Rabiot has done very little. Way some talk about him it's like he's Cantona/Zidane/Pogba rolled into one. Probably ripe for a big money premier league move by now.
De ligt, Bentancur, Arthur is starting to not to look too bad for Juventus.
If they manage to add a a few up an coming italian players like Tonali or Zaniolo - then they start to look pretty good.
They also have Demiral who is a beast.They bought Kulusevski, as well.