Antony image 21

Antony Brazil flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

5.8 Season Average Rating
Appearances
44
Goals
8
Assists
3
Yellow cards
8
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tend to agree, not sure why so many are quick to write off a lad who's basically been fine and is still finding his feet in European football, let alone English football.

First off, its not like he's been 'bad'. Frustrating yes, but there have been plenty of good moments. He's also raw and will need plenty of one on one coaching, but I feel he has all the attributes.

We're in a good spot at the moment whereby we have plenty of options in the wide forward positions. There's no reason to panic or make snap judgements
Modern day fans are so damn impatient and make quick conclusions. This thread is a prime example.
It's one thing to say he's been undwerwhelming or should do better but to hurry up calling him a flop and wonder when he'll be sold is madness.
 
People keep throwing the words talented and potential around, but I want to know what kind of player do you think he'll develop into with the skillset you have seen so far?

Is he going to be a great goal scoring wide forward like a Salah? An amazing ball carrier who can also create like Di Maria? Like tell me what type of player are we looking forward to him developing into because at the moment, I see nothing outstanding to work with.
thats my fear. I'm not seeing the initial talent level to work with and progress. Like nothing stands out as above average to me and its hard to become a top player from a mediocre baseline of skillsets as you'd have to vastly improve at everything which most players do not. hopefully he is just nervous and this is not his baseline at this age. If he can maybe work on his movement and runs into the box he can become a finisher and be like Ljunberg maybe?
The thing I'm holding on to with Antony is that the fact that my Brazilian students almost universally rate him and I thought he looked very good against Croatia in the World Cup. That being said, he's been very underwhelming since the WC. Still, it's early days....
Fingers crossed
 
In hindsight, and the know how annoying hindsight is, I’d have preferred us to sign Richarlison rather than Antony - proven prem pedigree and could fill in as a striker as well.
 
In hindsight, and the know how annoying hindsight is, I’d have preferred us to sign Richarlison rather than Antony - proven prem pedigree and could fill in as a striker as well.

Hasn’t scored a goal in the league in 8 months though.
 
In hindsight, and the know how annoying hindsight is, I’d have preferred us to sign Richarlison rather than Antony - proven prem pedigree and could fill in as a striker as well.
Classless player, embarrassment to himself and his club.
 
In hindsight, and the know how annoying hindsight is, I’d have preferred us to sign Richarlison rather than Antony - proven prem pedigree and could fill in as a striker as well.
Would've preferred Kulusevski over both, same age as Antony, would've been perfect for us at RW, Spurs got him for 50m.
 
Yeah don't think he will last too long at United, can see us looking for a replacement in the next year or so.

Its so annoying cause that RW position been a problem position for such a long time for us now.
 
I rather suspect that ETH is happier with Antony thus far than a lot of people here are.

Not least because I think he places a lot more value in Antony acting as an outball who holds possession under pressure and allows the team to move up the pitch than posters here do.

Antony's main problem so far has simply been his lack of creativity. On a really basic level he just isn't passing or crossing the ball into the box anywhere near as much as he did at Ajax. If whatever the issue there is gets resolved he'll be fine.
 
I rather suspect that ETH is happier with Antony thus far than a lot of people here are.

Not least because I think he places a lot more value in Antony acting as an outball who holds possession under pressure and allows the team to move up the pitch than posters here do.

Antony's main problem so far has simply been his lack of creativity. On a really basic level he just isn't passing or crossing the ball into the box anywhere near as much as he did at Ajax. If whatever the issue there is gets resolved he'll be fine.

Yes, I've been thinking along these lines myself.

This is a player ETH knows very well. The part in bold above makes sense to me.
 
Modern day fans are so damn impatient and make quick conclusions. This thread is a prime example.
It's one thing to say he's been undwerwhelming or should do better but to hurry up calling him a flop and wonder when he'll be sold is madness.
Not saying its appropriate for Antony but sometimes the evidence is all there to make quick conclusions and this is something the 'give him time' people never factor. I've seen pleas for Elanga and Mctominay to be given time but all the time does is lead to extra disappointment.

Labelling Antony a flop would be wrong, I do agree with that however saying he's looking like a potential flop is not. There are some warning signs with Antony flashing extremely bright at the moment but he seems like a hardworker and a fighter so there is still hope he could turn it around.
 
I rather suspect that ETH is happier with Antony thus far than a lot of people here are.

Not least because I think he places a lot more value in Antony acting as an outball who holds possession under pressure and allows the team to move up the pitch than posters here do.

Antony's main problem so far has simply been his lack of creativity. On a really basic level he just isn't passing or crossing the ball into the box anywhere near as much as he did at Ajax. If whatever the issue there is gets resolved he'll be fine.
What you’re saying he brings to the team makes sense in games against the likes of City or Arsenal, where possession (for us) is at a premium, and we need players who can keep hold of the ball and move it up the pitch under pressure.

But most games won’t be against teams as good as that, and in matches where we see a lot of the ball, his creative limitations become all too apparent. It was painfully obvious against Palace. Our inability to score enough goals when we’re on top, especially when Rashford is having an off day, has been our major problem this season.

That’s why I’d start Garnacho against weaker teams. He’s far more likely to create something.
 
People are getting way too far ahead of themselves with regard to Antony. He's going through a slump and is finding his feet and it's pretty apparent that he's had a drop in confidence and nerve, which is seeing him try less things or have the abandon to not care if they don't come off. He's become predictable because he isn't attempting much and surely people can see these things are linked?

The most telling thing with his game for me is he desperately, desperately needs a full-on overlapping fullback otherwise he will always struggle because his game is reliant on both the distraction and space said fullback provides to allow him pockets of space he simply doesn't get to operate in as conventional wing attacker. I would expect to see a solid correlation between his best career games and [very] good fullback performance i.e. his best actions/moments/clips will almost always have his fullback in frame dragging men with him and providing Antony with his moments to shine.

We as a club are lacking in 1:1 wide men, actually. Of that ilk, there's only Garnacho who can roast his man:
- from a standing start
- without support
- on the inside and outside channels
- with zero need for a chain reaction to initiate his own action (proactive instead of reactive).

The others need - or better to say - are optimised by a catalyst within the team construct. Sancho is combination playing maestro; Rashford wants space on the break; Antony is reliant on his fullbacks overlapping and so on and so forth.

I think a problem that has arisen in the general assessment of Antony is the expectation he can be that Garnacho-like maverick taking on all-comers independent of the team or optimal scenarios and that just isn't the player he is - the first thing he does when he gets the ball is look around at where his fullback is and what his options then are - with a winger like Garnacho, you can see that there is no pause to assess what has to happen at points A, B and C for him to come alive; he's all A and after he's worked his man, he'll see what the best option is from the fallout. We're most likely never going to see that from Antony as it's not his game in skilset or mindset.

I don't understand the mentality of the premature write off that is permeating the forum of late; some players and styles take longer or require more prerequisites than others. Unless a player is given their optimal conditions to thrive, should they just be written off? If we had done that in the past, many a player who went on to be legends here wouldn't have ever got the chance to display their true wares.

Anyway, playing time is going to be far from a given for Antony once Sancho returns.
I hear you. He does deserve our patience.

‘However, it is a bit troubling that he is so one-footed. When you’ve got one direction you can go, it takes special athleticism to get to your spots. In his appearances so far, I can’t see that he has it. He’s quick but not crazy quick, he’s fast but not Rashford fast. He’s not particularly strong either.

I think both Garnacho and even an out of form Sancho are better than him as it stands now.
 
What you’re saying he brings to the team makes sense in games against the likes of City or Arsenal, where possession (for us) is at a premium, and we need players who can keep hold of the ball and move it up the pitch under pressure.

But most games won’t be against teams as good as that, and in matches where we see a lot of the ball, his creative limitations become all too apparent. It was painfully obvious against Palace. Our inability to score enough goals when we’re on top, especially when Rashford is having an off day, has been our major problem this season.

That’s why I’d start Garnacho against weaker teams. He’s far more likely to create something.

Yes, but ETH right now has to balance the need for picking up points against the need for establishing/implementing a system (which is absolutely crucial, and ultimately more important than picking up points here and now).

Your take is fair as such - but these are early days. If a player like Antony doesn't offer anything beyond keeping possession (or performing some other basic function) in the long term - then he needs to be replaced as a starter for us, certainly.

For now, it's probably best to keep in mind that the team is very much a work in progress. As suggested above, it's not unreasonable to think that ETH is more pleased with Antony than we are (as fans, seeing him as a bit bland/non-creative lately).
 
I think it was because he did his usual thing of holding onto the ball for too long.



He really needs to let himself go, he's way too hesitant. I actually think his frustration was with himself.


Would like to see the play before that bit as I recall he had done well to get to that point but yeah it does look like an obvious pass was to Bruno in the first instance. However, Bruno coming towards Antony and sort of giving up when he did get the pass is not exactly great from him too.

Both players struggling in different aspects of their game not gelling is no surprise.
 
I rather suspect that ETH is happier with Antony thus far than a lot of people here are.

Not least because I think he places a lot more value in Antony acting as an outball who holds possession under pressure and allows the team to move up the pitch than posters here do.

Antony's main problem so far has simply been his lack of creativity. On a really basic level he just isn't passing or crossing the ball into the box anywhere near as much as he did at Ajax. If whatever the issue there is gets resolved he'll be fine.
Thank you for being able to notice this, I thought I was going insane with nobody understanding this. Everyone goes on about us losing control and being put under pressure when Weghorst came off but it was even more obvious that Antony being replaced by Bruno on the wing contributed to that, which happened at the same time. Apart from a few moments, Weghorst was hardly involved as an out ball.

People are so blinded by the fact that he’s not rushing down the touchline every time he receives the ball that they can’t see the value in someone who can receive the ball, hold it for four-five seconds without being dispossessed and thus bringing the entire team up and relieving pressure. Contrast this to having mr fancy flicks and Hollywood balls out there and it’s no coincidence that we were put under pressure after Antony came off.

Would I like him to drive at his full-back every now and then? Yes, obviously. Does him not doing that mean that he contributes nothing to the team? Absolutely not.
 
I rather suspect that ETH is happier with Antony thus far than a lot of people here are.

Not least because I think he places a lot more value in Antony acting as an outball who holds possession under pressure and allows the team to move up the pitch than posters here do.

Antony's main problem so far has simply been his lack of creativity. On a really basic level he just isn't passing or crossing the ball into the box anywhere near as much as he did at Ajax. If whatever the issue there is gets resolved he'll be fine.
I'm not getting involved with criticizing Antony, as he's young and new to the league. But in a general sense, I am not sure what you are saying is always a positive. While him holding possession for a few seconds allows the rest of the team to catch up, it also allows the defense to catch up and set up. Is it not better, at least at times, to try and take advantage of the break, and try to set up an attacking move before their defense has a chance to set up?
 
I'm not getting involved with criticizing Antony, as he's young and new to the league. But in a general sense, I am not sure what you are saying is always a positive. While him holding possession for a few seconds allows the rest of the team to catch up, it also allows the defense to catch up and set up. Is it not better, at least at times, to try and take advantage of the break, and try to set up an attacking move before their defense has a chance to set up?

Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't.

At times over the years at City Guardiola has spoken about them attacking too quickly and turning the game into a back and forth rather than being slower and moving the game into the opposition's half. And I think ETH was referring to the same thing when he twice spoke about us needing to play football rather than tennis this season, complaining about the game going from one end to another, saying we wasted energy and needed to be smarter about knowing when to speed up to go for a goal.
 
Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't.

At times over the years at City Guardiola has spoken about them attacking too quickly and turning the game into a back and forth rather than being slower and moving the game into the opposition's half. And I think ETH was referring to the same thing when he twice spoke about us needing to play football rather than tennis this season, complaining about the game going from one end to another, saying we wasted energy and needed to be smarter about knowing when to speed up to go for a goal.
Makes sense, I traditionally think of United as a counter attacking team, but, you are correct, if we are moving to being more of a possesion style team, then it makes sense. Cheers.
 
Far too early to write him off. Give him a pre season with the squad and hopefully he kicks on next year.
 
He's going to improve, he's nowhere near there but has shown good finishing. I expect with sancho coming back he will have a lot of competition soon and will need to improve to be in first team.
 
Why do we always going looking for a ball (player) to kick. Folk on here Mahrez this or that ,we didnt buy him end of, yesterdays newspaper todays fish & chip paper and he is 31. Looks at the stats, Anthony is new new to league. There isn't a pile of difference other than a slight xg mahrez is 2.8 Anthony 2.45, and 2 assists for Mahrez who has played in England for 9 years. Give the lad a chance for the sake of sanity. Garnacho cost us nothing in reality left and right for 80 million is a bargain. ETH has actually increased the value of every player since he has arrived here so forget the ££ and back the process.
 
He’s not set the league alight.. but despite this he’s scored a few important goals (he only scores cracking goals). Our shape is better with him, he is a menace to defend against (in an annoying pest sort of way) and his pressing is good. He needs to be more direct and run at defenders more with the ball. There was a run he did against palace where he took a player on and got right near the penalty box. won us a corner kick.. it was much better and exactly what we need more of. I like him and want him to be a success here .. he has a tenacity about him and passion with it. Don’t write him off just yet!
 
He’s not set the league alight.. but despite this he’s scored a few important goals (he only scores cracking goals). Our shape is better with him, he is a menace to defend against (in an annoying pest sort of way) and his pressing is good. He needs to be more direct and run at defenders more with the ball. There was a run he did against palace where he took a player on and got right near the penalty box. won us a corner kick.. it was much better and exactly what we need more of. I like him and want him to be a success here .. he has a tenacity about him and passion with it. Don’t write him off just yet!

The fact he took a player on against Palace gives me belief he can do it when required
 
I wish United fans understood that...if we hadn't bought Antony, the Glazers would have fecked off with that money the same way they're leaving with all the 16m savings from Ronaldo's wages.
 
I wish United fans understood that...if we hadn't bought Antony, the Glazers would have fecked off with that money the same way they're leaving with all the 16m savings from Ronaldo's wages.

Thats not how it works. How can people be so financially illiterate in this day and age?
 
Yes its how it works. Same reason they’re refusing to invest now …
 
..or we would've went for Hag's alternative to Antony.
No other top right winger was available. Even chelsea lost Raphina to Barcelona they didn’t buy anyone else because there wasn’t an alternative available
 
No other top right winger was available. Even chelsea lost Raphina to Barcelona they didn’t buy anyone else because there wasn’t an alternative available
One of the weirdest changes in football has been the shift from the derth of left wingers we used to have, to the sarcity of right wingers now. Of course it's just the same problem of there being so few left footers and two-footed players shifted across the pitch due to the inverted wingers trend, but it sticks out like a sore thumb with how few and how low the overall quality of the right-sided attackers there are, and the premium even semi-decent ones go for on the market.
 
thats my fear. I'm not seeing the initial talent level to work with and progress. Like nothing stands out as above average to me and its hard to become a top player from a mediocre baseline of skillsets as you'd have to vastly improve at everything which most players do not. hopefully he is just nervous and this is not his baseline at this age. If he can maybe work on his movement and runs into the box he can become a finisher and be like Ljunberg maybe?

Fingers crossed

To be fair this is what people said about Dalot and now he has had a run of games and acclimatised to the league he is looking far better than before (even if I'm not 100% sold).
 
I am not sure I am watching the same player as some people on here...post after post calling him slow and suggesting he lacks technical ability...I don't get it?

Yeah, Anthony can be frustrating but he's quick, he passes forwards, he can score goals, he holds the ball really well under pressure...I think there's plenty there to work with.
 
I am not sure I am watching the same player as some people on here...post after post calling him slow and suggesting he lacks technical ability...I don't get it?

Yeah, Anthony can be frustrating but he's quick, he passes forwards, he can score goals, he holds the ball really well under pressure...I think there's plenty there to work with.
When has he ever gone past his fullback on the outside and put a cross in?
 
He should be made to train crossing into the box from LW with his right foot. Literally all fecking day long.
 
For me he was good in the 2010 and 2011 seasons, effective but certainly not unplayable. He'd 7 seasons with us, 2 were good, his form 2012 onwards was awful. He scored some incredible goals and maybe that clouds people's judgement but as player I wasn't a fan. His antics at times were embarrassing, a trait Antony unfortuntely shares as well. I still cringe at his behaviour when Carragher tackled him that time. Antony has a lot of work to do, but if you look at Nani's best season in the pl, he had 9 goals in 33 games, Antony who has been poor has 3 goals in 10 pl games. he'd be on course to match that.

:wenger:

I suggest you go and watch the video of that tackle again and maybe look at the pics to see how deep a gash there was on Nani’s leg. You’d probably cringe again.
 
I know it's a different level of defending and all, but haven't seen Antony try most of this except the cut in and shoot



Hoping it will come with time and confidence, and adjustment to the league (eg second season and maybe a full preseason)
 
:wenger:

I suggest you go and watch the video of that tackle again and maybe look at the pics to see how deep a gash there was on Nani’s leg. You’d probably cringe again.
Yeah. Absolutely deranged thing to say, @poleglass red

Can't imagine what drives you to view it in such a skewed manner. Nani not man enough for you?
 
I wouldn't start him tomorrow. He's not playing well enough to live with Arsenal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.