Mr. Meeseeks
Full Member
Poor choice of words. I didn't mean to imply a change in formation. I meant that Zlatan leaving would free up Martial or Rashford to move upfront as his actual replacement (with the other remaining on the left). I think Griezmann's position would be on the right or #10 in the same formation we play now.If you mean he will replace Ibra as our talisman, instead of taking his position, then you have to specify it as it's something different. Because replacing, immediately leads to thoughts of one player being played instead of the other.
Also, you didn't exactly specify how because you vaguely said something about Griezmann freeing Martial and Rashford to play up front (in the 18/19 season) which implies a change of formation since there is no one else to play on the left then. But you didn't explain how the formation would change so that Martial/Rashford move up front with Griezmann.
Finally, regarding a like-for-like player replacement for Ibra, I have a sneaky suspicion that Jose might make a move for Lukaku in the future. He loves his target men and Lukaku's experience and goals in the PL speak for themselves. He might not be as skilled as Ibra or Griezmann, but you can't argue against his productivity up front. He has been very consistent too, with mediocre teams behind him.
My point was that we would need a player of Griezmann's quality to make sure the squad doesn't go backwards when we lose Zlatan (or as a talisman as you rightly put it).
I'm increasingly becoming impressed with Lukaku as well. Given the choice, Id still go for Griezmann because I think Martial is better developed than Lukaku was at that age and has a lot more potential. But I agree that Lukaku would also do very well for us.