Red4Life_#7
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 1,115
He could play from the right or in the number 10. He is an amazing goal fret... with great technical ability.
if he come here next season/January, Mkhi or especially Mata wont be here with us I think. well, Griezmann is better than them. Martial/Rashford - Mkhi - Griezman behind Lukaku look great.
I would fear for Mata mostly but think Mkhi would still see a lot of game time as he is capable of playing across the 3 positions behind the striker.if he come here next season/January, Mkhi or especially Mata wont be here with us I think. well, Griezmann is better than them. Martial/Rashford - Mkhi - Griezman behind Lukaku look great.
I don't know. I have this feeling that he's not 'tough' enough for the Premier League. I could be wrong of course, but he doesn't give me the impression that he can excel if the whole team is not playing well.Sorry to double post, I still think it's a good idea to get AG as a strategic buy, but I don't know if he will add any new dimension. I just wouldn't want another top team to buy him as, nonetheless, he can or can not do well. If I was gong to err, I would rather do so having AG.
if he come here next season/January, Mkhi or especially Mata wont be here with us I think. well, Griezmann is better than them. Martial/Rashford - Mkhi - Griezman behind Lukaku look great.
AG did nothing against Chelsea. I thought he would do better. Opinions post Chelsea? Chelsea is the type of team he would face in EPL, comments? It could be a bad game? Pressure to win since Costa there? I just don't see him solving the any of the problems current MU attacking line faces. In fact, I now think everyone of our attack is undroppable for AG. What do you think post Chelsea game?
But aint Pogba, Tony M and Ross the scorpion kick that already?If you look at other players from the top 6, Sanchez, De Bruyne, Eriksen, Hazard, Mane who can produce a moment of brilliance and with maybe the exception of Eriksen be unplayable at times, can he do the same? because that's the type of player we need.
AG did nothing against Chelsea. I thought he would do better. Opinions post Chelsea? Chelsea is the type of team he would face in EPL, comments? It could be a bad game? Pressure to win since Costa there? I just don't see him solving the any of the problems current MU attacking line faces. In fact, I now think everyone of our attack is undroppable for AG. What do you think post Chelsea game?
I find him a bit hit and miss and not really sure how he came third in the Ballon D'or (Top scorer at Euros?)
If he joined I'm sure he could replace Mata and get 15-20 league goals but also be equally as frustrating as Mkhitaryan can be for us and like Mkhitaryan, go missing in games.
If you look at other players from the top 6, Sanchez, De Bruyne, Eriksen, Hazard, Mane who can produce a moment of brilliance and with maybe the exception of Eriksen be unplayable at times, can he do the same? because that's the type of player we need.
I'd like to be wrong if he did join.
Where would he even fit in at Barca? If he leaves its 100% to United.I believed 100% he would come but I feel like it won't happen anymore
My only reason is because Barca will be sniffing for him.
Shame his release clause doesn't revert back until the summer.
In that case may the shit form continue!It does though. 010118.
In that case may the shit form continue!
Either way, I'm happy. He'd be cup tied anyway I guess.I was thinking we'd buy him in January with Costa going there. But now we know that Zlatan's back I'm not so sure. Probably makes more sense to buy AG in the summer waving goodbye to ZI.
I believed 100% he would come but I feel like it won't happen anymore
My only reason is because Barca will be sniffing for him.
He is an amazing goal fret...
He was happy to stay and signed a new contract, so his performances are surely aren't related to that. If we were to sign a secondary striker, I'd personally prefer Dybala.Watched the Chelsea game twice and he really didn't make any impact apart from the penalty which he hit straight down the middle. Chelsea dealt with him and he seriously over hit a couple balls into the box.
A few posters have hinted his form is poor because he decided to stay at Athletico to help them through the transfer ban. If that is the case he really should have taken on board the implications of staying and factored that into his mental approach. Doesn't this indicate a mental weakness which you wouldn't expect from a £92m player?
If that's the case it makes his current form even more inexplicable. He did say it would be a "dirty move to leave now". Jose does seem keen though.He was happy to stay and signed a new contract, so his performances are surely aren't related to that. If we were to sign a secondary striker, I'd personally prefer Dybala.
Where would he even fit in at Barca? If he leaves its 100% to United.
Can't see Barca going for him. If they wanted him they would of went for it with the Neymar money. Plus Griezmann loves Atletico so he wouldn't go to another Spanish team anyways.
Good thing then we won't be throwing 200 mn given the fact that his release clause is £86mn .
His release clause in the summer was too high for Barcelona to make sense of going for him then. Grizou has always said he prefers staying in Spain. Now that Neymar is gone I can see him seeing Barca as a viable option. It's the least riskiest for him as well as he knows the league and all the players.
Either on the right or left of Messi, opposite Suarez. They would bench Dembele as he's still a kid.
His release clause in the summer was too high for Barcelona to make sense of going for him then. Grizou has always said he prefers staying in Spain. Now that Neymar is gone I can see him seeing Barca as a viable option. It's the least riskiest for him as well as he knows the league and all the players.
If we bid £90M (or whatever), another club like Barca will put in their bid of say £100M. The bidding war will push the price to proper market value, which may be in the region of £150M.
Just because a player has a cheap release clause, does not mean that that is the exact price which he will be sold for.
Ultimately though it depends on what the players wants, ie. does he want to stay at A.Madrid or does he want to move (and which club does he prefer to move to). Personally, I think that if Barca show the cash, there is no way that we can compete for him, because Barca are a far better club to play for and after Moyes/LVG, MUFC are not currently an elite level team.
What I do find interesting is that some fans have convinced themselves that big players move in January. It really amazes me that when it comes to transfers, human beings throw logic out of the window. And if we are ignoring logic, why not talk about signing Messi and Ronaldo on 1st January?
My friend, you are being too logical. There is no place for logic on this forum.
Why would Barca or for that matter anybody be willing to pay more than the €100mn release clause, it is the maximum any club needs to pay to get griezmann if he is willing to sign for them, i agree that it is not as done and dusted to us as people think.If we bid £90M (or whatever), another club like Barca will put in their bid of say £100M. The bidding war will push the price to proper market value, which may be in the region of £150M.
Just because a player has a cheap release clause, does not mean that that is the exact price which he will be sold for.
Ultimately though it depends on what the players wants, ie. does he want to stay at A.Madrid or does he want to move (and which club does he prefer to move to). Personally, I think that if Barca show the cash, there is no way that we can compete for him, because Barca are a far better club to play for and after Moyes/LVG, MUFC are not currently an elite level team.
What I do find interesting is that some fans have convinced themselves that big players move in January. It really amazes me that when it comes to transfers, human beings throw logic out of the window. And if we are ignoring logic, why not talk about signing Messi and Ronaldo on 1st January?
What club would pay more than the release clause? The whole point is that once the clause is activated then the decision is in the players hands. So if the clause was met by us and Barcelona and he chose Barcelona, nothing would change by us offering an extra 10 mil to Atletico.If we bid £90M (or whatever), another club like Barca will put in their bid of say £100M. The bidding war will push the price to proper market value, which may be in the region of £150M.
Just because a player has a cheap release clause, does not mean that that is the exact price which he will be sold for.
Ultimately though it depends on what the players wants, ie. does he want to stay at A.Madrid or does he want to move (and which club does he prefer to move to). Personally, I think that if Barca show the cash, there is no way that we can compete for him, because Barca are a far better club to play for and after Moyes/LVG, MUFC are not currently an elite level team.
What I do find interesting is that some fans have convinced themselves that big players move in January. It really amazes me that when it comes to transfers, human beings throw logic out of the window. And if we are ignoring logic, why not talk about signing Messi and Ronaldo on 1st January?
My friend, you are being too logical. There is no place for logic on this forum.