TsuWave
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 15,767
he needs a run of games. happy that he scored
”Doesn’t want to be here”
I still don't feel like he's giving his all though... Don't know what it is.
Explain yourself or don't bother lad
It's okay. Some guy has managed it in the Rashford thread somehow.Lol you can tell which posters are salty about not being able to bash him tonight.
I still don't feel like he's giving his all though... Don't know what it is.
That second half was a big improvement on anything I've seen from him in a long time in that regard.
Sanchez refuses to play on the right.Don’t see why he and Sanchez cannot both start at the weekend. Or is Lingard some sort of automatic starter now? He was awful at Watford.
Like the majority of the players he has a poor first half attacking wise, his defensive contributions in terms of tracking back is the only thing worth mentioning.
In the second half, apart from a few misplaced passes, he gets the majority of his decision making correct. Makes himself available for passes, goes on runs to either get the ball or free up space for Shaw. Shows composure, gets the ball in tight situations where he's covered by 2 or more players and he still controls it nicely and passes it or goes past his marker, always looking to speed up the attacking play by playing quick one-two passes. Given his second half, which was quite good, it seems to me that it's somewhat overly harsh to suggest that there was nothing in this match showing his talents. Not sure if it should be considered as a surprise though, given that your post tonight in Rashfords performance thread is about "Martial FCers" bashing him to make Martial look better
Still don't think he's going to establish himself at United, but that's another story
He hardly did anything in reality though mate. Like I've said, he improved in the second half. It's an improvement on his many noticeably poor performances for sure. He was ok. Didn't see any point where his talent was particularly obvious though in tonight's game. Actually being able to keep up with the game doesn't count as that for me.
And that wasn't what my other post was about at all. It was pointing out the similarities between the situation but opposite reactions.
I just find it really hard to understand how you can be in the Rashford thread bigging up his talent, and then come in here being so reluctant to give any positive feedback for Martial after tonight's game. Martial was clearly the better performer today. Seems like you've already made your mind up.He hardly did anything in reality though mate. Like I've said, he improved in the second half. It's an improvement on his many noticeably poor performances for sure. He was ok. Didn't see any point where his talent was particularly obvious though in tonight's game. Actually being able to keep up with the game doesn't count as that for me.
And that wasn't what my other post was about at all. It was pointing out the similarities between the situation but opposite reactions.
I just find it really hard to understand how you can be in the Rashford thread bigging up his talent, and then come in here being so reluctant to give any positive feedback for Martial after tonight's game. Martial was clearly the better performer today. Seems like you've already made your mind up.
Considering your need to throw out "Martial FC" in this thread and others, I'm sure it's not much of a surprise, and on ignore you go.
I didn't put words in your mouth. I said you were in the Rashford thread bigging up his talent. Which you were. Just seemed like odd timing in terms of the manner of your posts. Especially the childish 'Martial FC' comment.Attitude and age are the main reasons. One half doesn't change my opinion on Martial's attitude. If he actually cracks on then it will, like it should be.
And don't put words in my mouth please. Awful trait. I said Rashford had a poor game in his thread.
Wade in with condescending lol emoji and no discussion and then can't handle a justified position that is hardly out there, then ignores
Please. You're the definition of Martial FC!
I didn't put words in your mouth. I said you were in the Rashford thread biggie up his talent. Which you were. Just seemed like odd timing in terms of the manner of your posts. Especially the childish 'Martial FC' comment.
Dude I've not been posting on here that long and I don't really see how your previous posts matter. I was talking about your comments after tonight's game in the respective players threads. Just seemed bizarre that you had to drag Martials name into a post about Rashford in what came across as a negative way. Seems like someone else might be a bit obsessed with the guy.I bigged up his talent and gave quite justified reasons for why people are going over top with their complaints.
I've bigged up Martial's talent before too, plenty of times, but believe all complaints about him have been justified.
I simply stated that I don't believe Martial's talents were on show tonight but said he played ok. Hardly a scathing review.
This is exactly what people are talking about when they say Martial FC. You're like hounds.
There's nothing particularly bad or a crazy line of thinking here.
Just thinking along the lines of the most basic things, which we’ve seen plenty of evidence of before. First thing that comes to mind is how the ball normally sticks to him when he’s recieving a pass. Rashford was very unlucky with his touch today in comparison. If only Martial had the grit and attitude to get on those balls like the one Rashford put in the post- and out. Can’t we just merge their skillsets and have ourselves a proper baller?What did he do in that game that proved undeniable talent though?
I know he has talent, but I'm not seeing it tonight.
Because he played well for 20 minutes against Young Boys? Mate, come on. He's been shite for 9 months. He has to earn his place. If he bags a brace from the bench on Saturday then we'll talk.He should start on the LW position on Saturday, Alexis can either go on the RW, or on the bench. Knowing Jose, it’s only a wet dream.
Dude I've not been posting on here that long and I don't really see how your previous posts matter. I was talking about your comments after tonight's game in the respective players threads. Just seemed bizarre that you had to drag Martials name into a post about Rashford in what came across as a negative way. Seems like someone else might be a bit obsessed with the guy.
Would also be interested in what I've said which makes me part of this mythical 'Martial FC' club you keep referring to?
Just thinking along the lines of the most basic things, which we’ve seen plenty of evidence of before. First thing that comes to mind is how the ball normally sticks to him when he’s recieving a pass. Rashford was very unlucky with his touch today in comparison. If only Martial had the grit and attitude to get on those balls like the one Rashford put in the post- and out. Can’t we just merge their skillsets and have ourselves a proper baller?
How was he shocking in the first half - he actually did defensive work today.
That is a good thing & things people seem to care about when no one actually gets in to the game.
He did well for a start after some time.
Okay then, fair enough - hate the term personally but that's just me. Personally thought Martials talent was pretty obvious in today's match if not hit and miss. What was more encouraging was his work ethic and desire to defend when he needed to. Seemed to lack confidence when running at his fullback tonight.If you'd read the post you should see it wasn't a negative about Martial. It was having a go at those that can't handle criticism of him (which is what Martial FC has always been a joke about rather than a slight on Martial), and comparing the similar situations of being out of form and played on the wrong side but no one mentioning that about Rashford, and instead acting like he has no talent.
It's painful when it gets down to explaining this stuff.
Agreed! And yeah, he does have excellent control to be fair. Nice for someone to actually respond like a normal person instead of trying to start an argument about him