Ander Herrera is a Manchester United Player!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see. So we'll have to deposit Herrera his buyout fee + whatever the tax rate is on that sum of money (or if we don't add it on, he'll have to pay it).

Pretty much Herrera has to pay the money himself to buyout his contract. That money is liable for tax. So he pays it himself or give him the difference.

Javi Martinez was liable for €6m, he was never requested to pay it.

Not sure about why he wasn't, but i believe Bayern did keep that money aside just in case he was? How ever Spain are cracking down on tax in football. e.g.: Messi.
 
Moyes had 15 season of experience, Woodward none, you can understand the naivety of one but not the other.

You can't top a top position then say you have no experience. You will naturally have certain expectations of a person in the position. If their experience means they aren't up to it then they should have not been appointed. It doesn't give them a freedom from criticism.
 
Maybe so, but BBC have said exactly the same. BBC won't say it unless they have verified with more than one source that it is correct as is their procedure.
well the bbc gives me more hope,
but been confident of signing a player and acualy sign him are very diffrent things. for all we know it is just bravado form some one inside united saying, yeah were still confident of getting our man, just becuase if they didnt say that this morning they would very daft, when everyone was expecting them to announce today.
 
:lol: Move away from the computer. You're really losing your shit now.

Out of interest, what do you think they do with all the money they get from signing players? Make all the seats in their stadium out of solid gold?

Agree - seems to know all the facts about this deal without applying any logic or common sense.
 
Does the Bosman ruling only apply the The FA, or is it a European thing?

Can he not piss on THEIR cornflakes instead and just pay off his wages and feck them over?
 
Whats the more stupid option:

1. Make a bid in attempt to avoid the issues with the buy-out route, have it rejected and then move on with activating the buy-out.
or
2. Move on with activating the buy-out without making a bid, accepting it will cost more time and money to do so when there is a possibility, however slight, that we could of just had a bid accepted and saved all the hassle.

Do you know who Bilbao are and their reputation for selling players :lol:

I think that it was a waste of time to make the bid, like I said it was nothing but a formality.
 
Pretty much Herrera has to pay the money himself to buyout his contract. That money is liable for tax. So he pays it himself or give him the difference.



Not sure about why he wasn't, but i believe Bayern did keep that money aside just in case he was?

Do we have any idea how much the tax rate is and what it means in regards to the buy out fee?
 
They're retweeting about how they are one of the most tweeted topics in the Manchester area. Then they tweet in English. Next they favourite a Liverpool supporter tweeting "hahaha" at the situation.

Athletic are loving the attention.
 
:lol: Move away from the computer. You're really losing your shit now.

Out of interest, what do you think they do with the money they get from signing players? Make all the seats in their stadium out of solid gold?
Invest it in their academy? In the past few years it went into the new San Mames. Again, what I'm saying is not a theory, it's fact. Bilbao only sign Basque players. 40 million isn't much use to them as a team due to their limited pool.
 
Seems very immature and small-time from Bilbao, knowing the player wants the move and has made the likely very difficult move of informing the club.
 
Pretty much Herrera has to pay the money himself to buyout his contract. That money is liable for tax. So he pays it himself or give him the difference.



Not sure about why he wasn't, but i believe Bayern did keep that money aside just in case he was? How ever Spain are cracking down on tax in football. e.g.: Messi.
Yep, they did, but he was never called to pay it. Although I heard if he was ever to move back to Spain he would have to pay that fee plus another fee for the buying club.
 
I'm sort of loving Bilbao's stance on this. I don't know many professional football clubs who would take the piss so much on social media. It's hilarious.
 
Does the Bosman ruling only apply the The FA, or is it a European thing?

Can he not piss on THEIR cornflakes instead and just pay off his wages and feck them over?

Bosman is an EU ruling with regard to the free movement of persons. It protected players from essentially being treated like a product rather than a person with rights. Any EU countries should be subject to it.
 
That's not bullshit, Herrera will pay that tax, well United will instead him.
I havn't seen anything about it anywhere but here.You would think if we were set to potentially pay an extra 14m in tax, some of the journalists might have seen fit to report that.
 
Very unlikely

If the reports are right, United are paying 3 of the 7 million since he reduced his demand by 4.

Obvioulsy he could pay the entirety of the tax but that would be weird.
 
You don't take a player, put him on a flight from Spain, put him through a medical, tour him round our training ground with Bobby Charlton, have his team photos taken without being damn sure it's finalized. I'm just saying, if this fails, it's all on Woodward. It could be all conjecture and posturing from Bilbao, and hopefully it is, but if United pull out we will be a joke.

I would be worried about if we even have the money, if this falls through
 
I havn't seen anything about it anywhere but here.You would think if we were set to potentially pay an extra 14m in tax, some of the journalists might have seen fit to report that.

We gave him 36m to pay the buy out clause there is a taxation on that, that's very simple.
 
I'm sort of loving Bilbao's stance on this. I don't know many professional football clubs who would take the piss so much on social media. It's hilarious.

It'd be hilarious if they were actually taking the piss, but you get the impression that they've all gathered around a single laptop in the boardroom after hours of negotiations about what the tweet should contain and then posted it with the sternest of faces. They aren't trolling. It might be interpreted as such, like Arsene Wenger's bid of £40m + £1 for Suarez but it all appears to be their actual stance. I just can't work out if it's highly professional or the complete opposite.
 
Pretty much Herrera has to pay the money himself to buyout his contract. That money is liable for tax. So he pays it himself or give him the difference..

That's a possible interpretation of an ambiguous contract law clause, that has historically not been treated in that way by the tax authorities. The other interpretation says a club can pay the money on the player's behalf.

Not sure about why he wasn't, but i believe Bayern did keep that money aside just in case he was? How ever Spain are cracking down on tax in football. e.g.: Messi.

The contract clause is ambiguous. Bayern acted as a responsible business and set aside money for a possible legal challenge, which so far hasn't come.
 
In what way is us paying tax beneficial to Bilbao?
Not really that complicated, is it? By increasing the effective price of the player they decrease the chance of it being bought. There's also the elusive (and probably not that important to them) issue of more tax income to their region :).

Making it has hard as possible for an unwanted deal to proceed is pretty self-explanatory. Even if they are aware that they won't be able to prevent the transfer it's logical that they will make it as hard as possible to the buyer. It also makes less likely that buying clubs want to go through this hassle very often, thus limiting the appeal of their players.
 
Lads, the minute you guys mentioned them favouring that Liverpool tweet they prompetly unfavoured it. They're reading the cafe. :nervous:
 
I'm sort of loving Bilbao's stance on this. I don't know many professional football clubs who would take the piss so much on social media. It's hilarious.

It tells a lot about the club to be honest. It's all about pride and there stance on things. I'm not sure it's a good image to have to be honest. Bilbao fans will be loving it, but I hope there's something we can do to feck them over and make the look stupid, I really do.
 
Oh look we've bid £29m for a player and the usual doom and gloom arseholes are back to wondering if we even have any money. Great.
 
It might go though some hiccups, as i've said lawyers need to close it down. But there is no reason not to make a medical in-between.
well thier is becuase when laywers get involved in can take weeks and weeks, in which time the player could get injured, the deal could fall through.....

also the simple fact of been disrespectful, having a player who belongs to another club having a medical with us with no agreement in place, which makes the club look daft and unprofessional.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.