paceme
Golly Gilmore
You then keep Charlton's shots but his array of passing is wasted with no one to aim for.
Just have him drop into midfield when he can during a game. He's not glued to the ground I assume.
You then keep Charlton's shots but his array of passing is wasted with no one to aim for.
Just have him drop into midfield when he can during a game. He's not glued to the ground I assume.
The point still remains that Charlton used to play with 2-3 forwards ahead of him, and here it is just the one chap to aim for. It's just a bit odd.
Is it going to be noted what season(s) these (in fact all) players are being ascribed?
Yup, like the diamond formation.
Charlton played with 2 ahead of him in '66 right? Hurst and Hunt. Ramsey played a 4132 formation.
Either way, he's one of the best of all time & offers me some flexibility when picking my formation.
No doubt, I was just commenting on your suggestion with one upfront. It's not the ideal setting to get the best out of Charlton, that's all.
-----Maradona--------9
-------------Charlton
---------CM-----------CM
----------------DM
That would arguably get the best out of Charlton then.
-----Maradona--------9
-------------Charlton
---------CM-----------CM
----------------DM
That would arguably get the best out of Charlton then.
-----Maradona--------9
-------------Charlton
---------CM-----------CM
----------------DM
That would arguably get the best out of Charlton then.
I love that formation but others don't seem to!
Not really sure
Me too. Lack of width is a problem though, right? Not a vote winner...
Not really sure, as like Charlton, Maradona was also a great passer, and one of the greatest at that. Getting the best out of him would having at least a couple of players who are willing to make runs and get at the end of his through balls.
Me too. Lack of width is a problem though, right? Not a vote winner...
Hey! Welcome mate!
Tbf Charlton can offer width, he played out wide a good few times when younger.
....
No, it won't be registered somewhere. Voters ultimately vote on what they see and have experienced. Some will see Madrid Ronaldo, some Red Ronaldo. It is an issue with many players and it tends to be the subject of much debate within the gamematch thread. Some people read that debate, participate and form an opinion (particularly if a manager is talking out of his arse); most vote based on the picture.
Another classic issue is players who have played for far too long. Don't remember who now but one player was massively underrated based on past-it form in England. Matthaus may have a similar issue as his latter form didn't justify the hype, let alone his arrogance (he was about 40 though!).
It will be interesting how this pans out. Some on here are surprised Ronaldinho goes in Round 2, while I would have him as one of the top 10 sure vote-winners. What sort of reception will Puskas/Di Stefano get? How deep can you go into those talent pools? From my experience when the United draft was done, my instinct was to ignore players I didn't know. That is, no plus, no minus, neutral. Most times I ended up not voting though.
Indeed, which is why I can see him in one of those CM roles. The choice of the other CM and the DM become very important though. You can't just drop anyone in there.
i was going to pick eusebio but didn't as i had pele.. would have been a great pick though.
What's all this about assistants?
It's good to have someone helping out, not only for the picks but also for having someone to pick the player when you are offline.