mightberight
Full Member
Hold on, mate. Jake has to repick.
Not my fault mate - off to bed now
Hold on, mate. Jake has to repick.
Not my fault mate - off to bed now
Fair enough.
Hey mate. I think you are talking about the Test Cricket Draft. Well, it never went past the first group stage. Everyone lost interest.
Did an ODI one later on, which was completed.
he's took too.
Or it could be because Romario didn't play that much in 94/95; and after 4 titles in a row and just won European Cup, Barca was a bit demotivated?
But nonetheless, Laudrup was great player for sure. Of course, missing him was a blow for any team.
Romario said:The best player I have ever played with and the 4th best in the history of the game
Stoichkov said:From more than hundred goals that I scored I'm sure that over 50 were assisted by Michael. To play with him was extremely easy. We found each other by intuition on the field and found common football language. Look at Ivan Zamorano. Laudrup went there (Real) and Zamorano is a goalscorer. Sometimes I envy Ivan for the passes he receives. Passes on foot after you accelerated. Few people understand football like the Danish player.
Zamorano said:Un genio!, the reason why I make so many goals, is Laudrup
Thanks. So, he's more of a playmaker (ball distributor) that can dribble well? Well, United can use one for sure.
I could of took mbrs pick, I was considering him, but I won't be a prick.
Oh feck off I was looking forward for Iniesta.
I was thinking in about 30 minutes until I posted my pick about Iniesta or Redondo.. both really good picks I think.
Brwned's switch from Xavi to Valeron is partly about the dribbling, partly about the complete lack of a defensive contribution. The only touch of Xavi is regarding vision and passing.
Yes, basically. Great, great passer, supreme ball control and fantastic awareness - the kind of player you watch for one game and recognise his class. He did have this very 'languid' style though, and while I wouldn't go as far as saying he didn't contribute defensively at all it's definitely something to consider. There's actually a decent video of him here:
That's probably the 5th or 6th classic game I watched and Didi was spellbinding, I thought. Went in for Pelé but it became clear after a few minutes that Didi was the king at this stage in their careers. Can anyone elaborate on his poor time at Madrid? Why did Madrid want him when they already had Di Stéfano?
And you may well have gotten both. We weren't even sure whether to go with Redondo at 4th or 5th (hopeless). Better this way, I can start recalculating from now and you definitely got the more important one for your side as it is.
Not my fault mate - off to bed now
Can anyone elaborate on his poor time at Madrid? Why did Madrid want him when they already had Di Stéfano?
That's the problem when dominant, leader-types (let's say captains) are dropped into the same team,let alone the same area of the pitch!
I'll leave that to Brwned.You mean like this?
----Keane---Falcao
-------Di Stefano
Nice picks. I was hoping Redondo would last until my 4th pick
And I can see Gio cumming in his pants as soon as Redondo came up on the screen. Ridiculous that he lasted so long. It was a big debate with Aldo but we were actually holding out for...
I read that Valeron was injured a lot, thus couldn't maintain his excellent form for long enough period to be considered the best.
I did consider a Redondo - Xavi - Platini midfield three for its complementarity and synergy. However I wasn't willing to devote a third or fourth pick to him and it was unlikely he'd last until the middle reaches when others require him much more.
Chuffed to secure Rivaldo who, as I've said many times on this forum, had no peers between Maradona and Messi.
Chuffed to secure Rivaldo who, as I've said many times on this forum, had no peers between Maradona and Messi.
Where is it you're intending to stick Rivaldo in your team, Gio? Wide left?