All Time Chain Draft - QF2: antohan vs diarm

With all players at their peaks who would win?


  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
The amount of times anto has said he doesn't care about the match threads but then proceeds to argue like his life depends on it.....

Just can't help himself :lol:
 
How many of the people voting for Antohan have actually witnessed his players play? Diarm gets my vote because I have a rough idea of how his team might play together, having seen most of his players play during my lifetime.
 
Ugh. Not the "no one deserves to lose so lets see penalties" thing again. Results should be hidden so they don't influence your own vote.

No, as I said before I had decided to vote for anto since last night. But diarm has done a fantastic job and that held me up reading his debates. As I may be offline soon, decided to plonk my vote now.
 
How many of the people voting for Antohan have actually witnessed his players play? Diarm gets my vote because I have a rough idea of how his team might play together, having seen most of his players play during my lifetime.
The problem with that approach is, that you won't ever learn anything new about the game and it's fecking boring to play it that way. For me (and for many others?), these 'kinda silly' draft games are mostly a ride through the history of the game, through decades of fantastic football stories, of great drama. It's about learning what players in previous decades, in lesser known competitions achieved and it's what leads to some of the best football discussion on the internet. You get to read from people all around the world of different ages who followed different teams and different players. Obviously it's sometimes impossible to put it all together perfectly in your mind, when trying to make a decision who to vote for. But so what. Let it inspire you, have an open mind and maybe look into some of the players yourself, if you're not sure about it.

Don't dismiss greats of the game from previous decade just because you don't know them. They deserve better. If you're not convinced they're actually that great after reading into them, that's a different story.
 
So we're getting close to the final straight. Neck and Neck at the minute and clearly it's a close match.

In such a game, I just feel I have more match winners. Any one of Klinsmann, Völler, Baggio, Schuster, Tardelli and Scholes can and have, stepped up to the plate to make the decisive difference in these crucial tight games.

  • Klinsmann against Holland in 1990. With Germany down to 10 men for over an hour, he took the game by the scruff of the neck, scoring and dragging his side to an unlikely victory.
  • Voller at the world cup in 86. Scoring the winner in the semi final and equalising in the 80th minute of the final against Argentina. Then in 1990, he won the 85th minute penalty that saw Germany lift the cup.
  • Baggio at USA 94. Take your pick from the winners and magical moments he produced in almost every game.
  • Schuster - His performances at the Euros in 1980. The game and his goal against Real Madrid in 1982. Time and time again the golden haired god stepped up and delivered.
  • Scholes and his epic winner against Barcelona in that semi final. His pass to Rooney against AC Milan. The countless times he provided the killer pass or the wonder volley to decide a game.
  • Tardelli - That goal to win the world cup final of 1982. That iconic celebration. A man with a thunderous shot and a heart of fire.
These are all iconic, memorable moments ingrained into the fabric of the game. The players in this team will deliver. Especially against a side that has spent the majority of a game chasing the ball and is tiring. My side has allowed the ball do the work, to do the talking, and now they are ready to do something special.
 
I know all the mails are going out now. Begging for votes and telling you all how terrible I've been in this thread. I got the mail in the first round but I didn't change my vote. You don't have to either! Just read through the thread and you'll see that it's been more than a fair debate!
 
Oh boy.. I came to vote.. but it is dead heat in here.. 15 -15.. don't like the pressure of deciding this either way.
 
I know all the mails are going out now. Begging for votes and telling you all how terrible I've been in this thread. I got the mail in the first round but I didn't change my vote. You don't have to either! Just read through the thread and you'll see that it's been more than a fair debate!

What's all this about?!
 
Oh boy.. I came to vote.. but it is dead heat in here.. 15 -15.. don't like the pressure of deciding this either way.

By scale, there are only a couple of minutes left on the clock. Who's going to step up and pinch it? The side who has been passing the ball around and owning possession all game or the side who has been chasing the ball and closing down all this space all game?

When the first side has Scholes, Tardelli, Schuster, Baggio, Voller and Klinsmann I think there's only one answer.
 
Oh boy.. I came to vote.. but it is dead heat in here.. 15 -15.. don't like the pressure of deciding this either way.
I hate it too when I leave voting for late and then realise how big an impact my vote has. More often then not, I chicken out :lol:. But I'm sure you're much more brave than I am.
 
tumblr_mg2p8w7hkZ1s0hia6o1_250.gif
 
It's the hidden game behind the game. The lobbying! I don't mind it though. Obviously all is fair in love and drafts.
We also love the blame and shame thing. Obviously there's discussion going on in private conversations. Everyone knows it and it's no problem as long as it's not only about winning votes, which would be a bit silly.
 
I know all the mails are going out now. Begging for votes and telling you all how terrible I've been in this thread. I got the mail in the first round but I didn't change my vote. You don't have to either! Just read through the thread and you'll see that it's been more than a fair debate!

No mails, I PMd people right in front of your nose at the end of page 5.

I PMd a few non-voting regulars last time simply because every time I bumped the thread I lost a vote!

Anyhow, I've told you already, have it. I'm done with it for good. There's no point getting excited about the great stories to be told in a draft format if all it will end up in is people pleading ignorance and going for the angle that "you should go with what you know".

I told @Joga Bonito this draft was destined for that once Kazi looked a dead-man walking, Pat_Mustard was bound to get zero credit for Law and one of us two would knock each other out.

The only positive I take out of this is that after doing the hard slog of introducing Schuster in drafts he now seems to get the sort of appreciation he deserves.

Anyhow, over and out, if it goes to penos everything to the left. Sorted.
 
We also love the blame and shame thing. Obviously there's discussion going on in private conversations. Everyone knows it and it's no problem as long as it's not only about winning votes, which would be a bit silly.

I'll say no more. Just enjoying a cracking debate and want to invite it all out into the open! :D Just over a minute to play of normal time! Is Baggio about to break some South American hearts or are we going to penalties?
 
No mails, I PMd people right in front of your nose at the end of page 5.

I PMd a few non-voting regulars last time simply because every time I bumped the thread I lost a vote!

Anyhow, I've told you already, have it. I'm done with it for good. There's no point getting excited about the great stories to be told in a draft format if all it will end up in is people pleading ignorance and going for the angle that "you should go with what you know".

I told @Joga Bonito this draft was destined for that once Kazi looked a dead-man walking, Pat_Mustard was bound to get zero credit for Law and one of us two would knock each other out.

The only positive I take out of this is that after doing the hard slog of introducing Schuster in drafts he now seems to get the sort of appreciation he deserves.

Anyhow, over and out, if it goes to penos everything to the left. Sorted.

Don't be that guy. You've created an awesome side and you beat what I thought was the best side in the draft in the first round. You have to live and die by the same rules and if I came out and laid down for your team of golden oldies the game wouldn't be any more fun.

I haven't attacked any of your players in the way you've attacked a couple of mine and am just giving as good as I'm getting. You can't have your cake and eat it.
 
I PMd a few non-voting regulars last time simply because every time I bumped the thread I lost a vote!

:(. Wasn't expecting that from you. Knew you'd do anything to win but out in the open, not like that.
 
Christ anto, why not just tag them in here? Thought we put this can of worms to rest.
It's not on what the PM's contain...but more on doing it out of visibility, however innocuous they may be.

They were all regulars I noticed had commented but not voted, or voted based on something I had clarified later: Balu, harms, diarm, that was all. I trust all fo them to be their own men and make up their minds.

Again, @diarm doing a great job of mud-slinging when I've already told him to go on to the semi. I'm done. I suppose I'll have to ask for a ban for you to believe it, so I will.
 
Don't be that guy. You've created an awesome side and you beat what I thought was the best side in the draft in the first round. You have to live and die by the same rules and if I came out and laid down for your team of golden oldies the game wouldn't be any more fun.

I haven't attacked any of your players in the way you've attacked a couple of mine and am just giving as good as I'm getting. You can't have your cake and eat it.

I've said a long time ago I didn't want any of that any more. It's just not fun after a while. You are the one saying Schiaffino and Gunnar Nordahl can't rape Beppe Baresi and Sol Campbell. That's not attacking your players, it is being truthful, they are well out of their depth here.

For the record, I've had nothing but praise for Tardelli, Schuster, Klinsi and Voller throughout the game. I even told you @Joga Bonito was right you should switch to 4-2-2-2.

:(. Wasn't expecting that from you. Knew you'd do anything to win but out in the open, not like that.

See above^^^ Harms never voted anyway, Balu I'm not sure, diarm voted you. You lost because everyone loves an underdog, same as here.
 
They were all regulars I noticed had commented but not voted, or voted based on something I had clarified later: Balu, harms, diarm, that was all. I trust all fo them to be their own men and make up their minds.

Again, @diarm doing a great job of mud-slinging when I've already told him to go on to the semi. I'm done. I suppose I'll have to ask for a ban for you to believe it, so I will.
I've said a long time ago I didn't want any of that any more. It's just not fun after a while. You are the one saying Schiaffino and Gunnar Nordahl can't rape Beppe Baresi and Sol Campbell. That's not attacking your players, it is being truthful, they are well out of their depth here.

For the record, I've had nothing but praise for Tardelli, Schuster, Klinsi and Voller throughout the game. I even told you @Joga Bonito was right you should switch to 4-2-2-2.



See above^^^ Harms never voted anyway, Balu I'm not sure, diarm voted you. You lost because everyone loves an underdog, same as here.

Anto, take a deep breath. Both of you have done an exemplary job. Nothing more can be expected from either. Let this settle and voters decide.

Relax!
 
Anyhow, it's done. Goodbye.

Enjoy your youtube clips of players you have all seen a zillion times anyway and all the lip service to great players until you get your hands on vote-winners.

For the record, if Cutch went out I wasn't going Falcao-Conti (a great draft-winning move), I was going Liedholm-Rivera and then Hamrin-Zoff. There was a story there, a suberb story actually.
 
They were all regulars I noticed had commented but not voted, or voted based on something I had clarified later: Balu, harms, diarm, that was all. I trust all fo them to be their own men and make up their minds.
Wait, what? I didn't even get what you meant. You were talking about something entirely different in the text and therefore I thought it's just another conversation between us.

To be fair, it's slightly controversial. You really shouldn't have done it.

And it hurts me deeply that you only start conversations with me when you want something :(.

See above^^^ Harms never voted anyway, Balu I'm not sure, diarm voted you. You lost because everyone loves an underdog, same as here.
Didn't vote either, you suck at cheating :lol:.
 
I've said a long time ago I didn't want any of that any more. It's just not fun after a while. You are the one saying Schiaffino and Gunnar Nordahl can't rape Beppe Baresi and Sol Campbell. That's not attacking your players, it is being truthful, they are well out of their depth here.

No but you are continuing to make Campbell out to be much worse than he is when in fact, his strengths line up quite well against the strengths of Nordahl. He's strong and quick enough that I simply don't see how the Swede is going to "rape" him.
 
Wait, what? I didn't even get what you meant. You were talking about something entirely different in the text and therefore I thought it's just another conversation between us.

To be fair, it's slightly controversial. You really shouldn't have done it.

And it hurts me deeply that you only start conversations with me when you want something :(.

Didn't vote either, you suck at cheating :lol:.

Don't be hurt, that was indeed meant as a convo, the question on why you weren't voting was just a kick off. I do enjoy our chats, one of the few things I would miss really.
 
Anto, take a deep breath. Both of you have done an exemplary job. Nothing more can be expected from either. Let this settle and voters decide.

Relax!

Yeah I feel awful about how this is ending after really enjoying a great game. Come on @antohan , it isn't over yet and don't leave it like this.
 
Don't be hurt, that was indeed meant as a convo, the question on why you weren't voting was just a kick off. I do enjoy our chats, one of the few things I would miss really.
I knew I should have included white text somewhere, it was obviously a joke ffs. You really need a holiday to relax a bit, good that one is coming up ;).
 
No but you are continuing to make Campbell out to be much worse than he is when in fact, his strengths line up quite well against the strengths of Nordahl. He's strong and quick enough that I simply don't see how the Swede is going to "rape" him.

STOP IT, seriously, Sol Campbell and Giuseppe Baresi with Neville next to them have no chance whatsoever against Schiaffino, Nordahl and Facchetti. I'm not attacking anyone here or saying what is convenient, anyone denying it is just being downright dishonest.
 
STOP IT, seriously, Sol Campbell and Giuseppe Baresi with Neville next to them have no chance whatsoever against Schiaffino, Nordahl and Facchetti. I'm not attacking anyone here or saying what is convenient, anyone denying it is just being downright dishonest.

Good man. That's more like it.

I totally disagree of course but I'm glad you're back up on your feet. They'll be singing songs to their grandkids in the hills about how Big Sol had Gunnar in his pocket today. A story for the ages!
 
I knew I should have included white text somewhere, it was obviously a joke ffs. You really need a holiday to relax a bit, good that one is coming up ;).

I knew you weren't serious, but after reading 7 pages of people having a go I have this ridiculous accusations to boot, so wanted to clear it up. Had it not been for that comment about email campaigns I wouldn't have posted again.

I actually withdrew when I was still ahead. Nothing to do with scorelines. I'm done, period.
 
Good man. That's more like it.

I totally disagree of course but I'm glad you're back up on your feet. They'll be singing songs to their grandkids in the hills about how Big Sol had Gunnar in his pocket today. A story for the ages!

You really are a soft lad, aren't you? There's no agenda in that, it's a simple fact.

As I said earlier, I'm not sure why people like @Annahnomoss bring up the Nordahl stuff when clearly he isn't performing at the same level as Christian Vieri. To the dustbin of drafts with him. Should have just gone stright to Liedholm and played Altafini, clearly. Didn't quite go with the story though.
 
Good man. That's more like it.

I totally disagree of course but I'm glad you're back up on your feet. They'll be singing songs to their grandkids in the hills about how Big Sol had Gunnar in his pocket today. A story for the ages!
I like your spirit, well played. Congrats and really looking forward how you'll improve the team.
 
Anyhow, good win @diarm, as I said earlier you clearly wanted it badly and frankly I don't have even a remote interest in carrying on with this.