Alexis Sanchez | Udinese: No Deal Yet

Status
Not open for further replies.
It seems we just can't seem to secure the top talents in Europe... ever. We got Hernandez but that's because no one else was after him.

Very disappointing but we move on.

This summer, I can't see us getting the star signing we've been yearning for since Ronaldo left.
I cant remember us ever signing players from the top tier. Its always been players from the likes of Villa and Spurs, who are ready to step up to the top table or a young, unknown gem from a foreign country that we mould into a star. Have we ever signed someone from Real, Barca, Inter or AC etc? I know we got Hargreaves from Bayern, but I cant recall any other transfer from that level of club or a player as widely hyped as Sanchez is.

I'd love if we did, dont get me wrong. Its really frustrating at times trying to suppress my inner muppet, especially when I see my friends getting excited about transfers of big name players (relative to their club size anyway) and we end up with a sensible, shrewd purchase that has no real wow factor. Come May its more often than not me who is happier than they are, but it'd be nice to have a transfer window where I could get really excited about a transfer.
 
If we dont make any significant changes, we're going to have to hope Chelsea beat Barca over 2 legs next season in the CL. In my opinion, they're the only team capable of winning against them this way.
 
They will get Fabregas as well.


Extending the gigantic gulf between them and everyone else.

Got to admire the way they do it.

Fabregas was theirs in the 1st place. I dont see how he can get a regular game but cracking addition to their squad
 
The thing is, he probably would never have become that player without the shenanigans of the 2006 World Cup. That focused him into being the best he could be, without that he probably would be at Madrid, but more along the lines of what Robinho was for them, than what he is now.

Whats more, Guardiola hasnt shown anything like the capacity to replicate what he did with the La Masia graduates, to the players he buys. I really do think this will be a Zlatan MkII, only worse because with Zlatan you could see the need for him. Sanchez doesnt ostensibly look like he could add to the dynamic in any of the front three positions. He dribbles extremely well, yes. But the rest of his game isnt on par with either Villa (Finishing, and general movement) nor Pedro (intelligence, cunning, vision), and he is nowhere near on par with Messi. He is an outstanding prospect but at the moment, that is what he is. He certainly wont instantly take up a starting position for Barca, despite his price. Just look at Chyrgrynsky who cost 25m and almost immediately sent back to Shakhtar...

Its a strange move for both Barca and Sanchez IMHO. They have a need for midfield reinforcement as Xavi realistically has 3 seasons left at the top. He already seems to be passing on the reigns to Messi in being the fulcrum of the side anyhow. Sanchez will not solve that. Fabregas will, and Rossi has the cunning to operate the Iniesta role perfectly, leaving Iniesta free to take up Xavi's mantle. Sanchez just seems like overkill.

Good post. There are definitely queries over Guardiola's ability to get/develop the best out of his big-buys. And there being a lack of end-product (and thus the need for him to be developed and have his game grow) in Sanchez's game was the impression I got, but like I said I haven't seen him enough to be confident in formulating a proper opinion on him.

You never know, in two years time Sanchez could be on the market at a cut-price.

However I do disagree regarding Ronaldo - I don't think he needed the 2006 WC 'incidents' to provide the impetus for him to go on and become (to be) one of the games' all-time greats. To me he always came across as an extremely driven, determined and professional player. And whilst I believe Ferguson and United provided the perfect platform for him to become said player, I believe he would have eventually got there no matter which club he originally signed for. Though maybe a manager of Ferguson was able to keep him grounded, as no doubt a player like him, with his money, looks, fame and ability would have a LOT of potential pitfalls he could have stumbled into.

I remember some back when people on here were demanding he be sold, as he was simply a show-pony unable to put pressure on the board during games. I remember the continuous unfavourable comparisons to Rooney too, and was one of the (very) few who argued for Ronaldo. I thought he had it in him to develop into the worlds' best player - and unfortunately he proved me right, and then some.
 
Fabregas was theirs in the 1st place. I dont see how he can get a regular game but cracking addition to their squad

They haven't signed him yet. Though I would have thought Iniesta would move up into a more advanced position to make way for Fabregas - but now with Sanchez signing that option looks extemely unlikely.

Mark my words when he does eventually sign for them he will become one of the games great midfielders, he'll piss all over everyone in Spain - the amount of time on the ball, and the sheer domination of possession Barcelona will have will enable him to pass the proverbial shite out of all comers.
 
They will get Fabregas as well.


Extending the gigantic gulf between them and everyone else.

Got to admire the way they do it.

I'm not denying that, my issue is how are those two going to take going from Bona fide players of World Class repute, to essentially being Squad players? Sanchez is giving up a guaranteed starting spot in almost every other team in the world to go to Barca. He is a fantastic dribbler, but its not like Pedro and Villa cant dribble either, and whats more they have much more to their bow than Sanchez. I really cant see him getting an extended run of games as Pedro, despite not being as eyecatching, performs a crucial role in that Barca side. Its his movement, along with Villa's, which opens up the space in the final third, and on top of that, when he gets a chance he invariably takes it. Sanchez simply doesnt.

Fabregas is a different case cos he's Barca through and through and probably knows that he will get Xavi's role when he ultimately reites. But the impact of reduced pitch time may be telling on him once he gets that chance.
 
They haven't signed him yet. Though I would have thought Iniesta would move up into a more advanced position to make way for Fabregas - but now with Sanchez signing that option looks extemely unlikely.

Mark my words when he does eventually sign for them he will become one of the games great midfielders, he'll piss all over everyone in Spain - the amount of time on the ball, and the sheer domination of possession Barcelona will have will enable him to pass the proverbial shite out of all comers.

He will sign for them very soon.
 
If we dont make any significant changes, we're going to have to hope Chelsea beat Barca over 2 legs next season in the CL. In my opinion, they're the only team capable of winning against them this way.

If we make the right additions I believe we'd be able to do it too. We've shown we can definitely match them on our day, unfortunately for everyone though is theirs is practically every day.

Third time lucky and all that too...
 
He will sign for them very soon.

When Wenger decides to cash in, yes. 'Soon' is subjective though.

Fabregas may ask for a move behind closed doors, but he will never come out and publicly say he wants out - he seems to love the club and Wenger too much to do that. Say what you want about him but he's been a class act in that regard. He came out the other day and said it's up to Wenger.

The problem for Barcelona is they continue to do themselves no favours... Their frankly ridiculous and insulting valuations of Fabregas will never pique Wenger's interest. Wenger knows there will be blood if we sell our Captain and best player, who is contracted for many more years, for anything less than a king's ransom... A ransom in which Barcelona have been known to pay in the past for the players they want - see Ibrahimovic, Villa, Chygrynsky, Alves, Sanchez, etc, etc... All of which are inferior players to Fabregas.

What Barcelona are obviously waiting for is for Fabregas to force the issue publicly, which he won't do (I believe). I think Wenger owes it to him to allow him to move eventually - and I expect that will be in another season or two when Ramsey and Wilshere are able to fully take up his mantle.
 
Good post. There are definitely queries over Guardiola's ability to get/develop the best out of his big-buys. And there being a lack of end-product (and thus the need for him to be developed and have his game grow) in Sanchez's game was the impression I got, but like I said I haven't seen him enough to be confident in formulating a proper opinion on him.

You never know, in two years time Sanchez could be on the market at a cut-price.

However I do disagree regarding Ronaldo - I don't think he needed the 2006 WC 'incidents' to provide the impetus for him to go on and become (to be) one of the games' all-time greats. To me he always came across as an extremely driven, determined and professional player. And whilst I believe Ferguson and United provided the perfect platform for him to become said player, I believe he would have eventually got there no matter which club he originally signed for. Though maybe a manager of Ferguson was able to keep him grounded, as no doubt a player like him, with his money, looks, fame and ability would have a LOT of potential pitfalls he could have stumbled into.

I remember some back when people on here were demanding he be sold, as he was simply a show-pony unable to put pressure on the board during games. I remember the continuous unfavourable comparisons to Rooney too, and was one of the (very) few who argued for Ronaldo. I thought he had it in him to develop into the worlds' best player - and unfortunately he proved me right, and then some.

I dunno, we'll have to agree to disagree on that score, mate. I wont deny he looked extremely promising, but that promise was at best looking like it was 3-4 seasons away from coming to fruition, and at worst, never looking likely of coming to the fore. For instance, he improved season on season in his first three, but the rate of improvement wasn't anything to be excited about. 6 goals in his first. 9 in his 2nd, and 12 in his 3rd. Assists-wise, I dont know the exact figures, but from memory I'm assuming he would have been around the 6-7 mark. Nothing marking him out as being legendary IMHO. Then immediately after the summer break he came back and got 23 goals and something like 21 assists. A ridiculous tally, especially when regard is had to his previous tallies.

In that season after the World Cup, he genuinely was on the same platform as Kaka and Ronaldinho. In his previous seasons, you wouldn't struggle to name 5 better, more complete players than him, who were playing in the Premier League at that time.

I genuinely think that hate campaign after the World Cup was the catalyst to his development and without it, I dont think we would have seen the same player. I really do think we'd have the ego of today's Ronaldo without the goals to back it up IMHO...
 
i support united but if barca came in for me and i had genuine world class talent, even i would have to think twice not going with blaugrana.

Their pull is THAT strong. I don't begrudge any player for picking them when I as a united fan would think about going with them as well.
 
not all that arsed that barca is getting this lad. they were already streets better than us, the marginal increase to their team is minimal.

I'd be more worried if they actually got thiago silva.

As for us..never understood how sanchez fit in for us. I've only had my eyes on sneijder all of these years.

sneijder plus another midfielder would be ideal.
 
No but signing for the most complete side in Europe is a soft option.

Why wouldn't a player want to join the team that has the best chance of being successful both domestically and in Europe?
 
I cant remember us ever signing players from the top tier. Its always been players from the likes of Villa and Spurs, who are ready to step up to the top table or a young, unknown gem from a foreign country that we mould into a star. Have we ever signed someone from Real, Barca, Inter or AC etc? I know we got Hargreaves from Bayern, but I cant recall any other transfer from that level of club or a player as widely hyped as Sanchez is.

I'd love if we did, dont get me wrong. Its really frustrating at times trying to suppress my inner muppet, especially when I see my friends getting excited about transfers of big name players (relative to their club size anyway) and we end up with a sensible, shrewd purchase that has no real wow factor. Come May its more often than not me who is happier than they are, but it'd be nice to have a transfer window where I could get really excited about a transfer.

That's because we don't buy top tier players, we make them. We did try with Veron and look where that led.

On your final point - the club evaluate potential transfers at far greater depth than the youtube muppets in the transfer forum (well Bebe aside). We could've bought Karim Benzema rather than Javier Hernandez, which would have initially disappointed many in here, only to be wiping the egg off their faces later in the season. In the greater scheme of things, the transfer enthusiasts here and the ones who call them selves journalists know very litte about why we buy specific players and what Fergie has in mind when he gives the thumbs up to proceed - so - getting disappointed about the absence of big names is really worth it. I'm ecstatic about the likes of Smalling, Hernandez, Jones, and hope we add another quality player of their ilk (for me that would be Mario Goetze), rather than empty our coffers to buy a 30m quid player, which for us, historically, has been a risky proposition. It worked for Rio and Rooney, not so much for Veron and Berba.
 
Sanchez and Messi with Pedro or Villa up front, fecking hell.
 
i support united but if barca came in for me and i had genuine world class talent, even i would have to think twice not going with blaugrana.

Their pull is THAT strong. I don't begrudge any player for picking them when I as a united fan would think about going with them as well.

I can understand Sanchez going to Barca instead of United.

But as a United fan you would go to Barca as well?:nono:

Its not like United are a second rate club and If you can improve United and help them to better than Barca why?:o
 
I can understand Sanchez going to Barca instead of United.

But as a United fan you would go to Barca as well?:nono:

Its not like United are a second rate club and If you can improve United and help them to better than Barca why?:o

We need a couple of world class midfielders to catch up with Barca, not a winger/second striker/whatever position Sanchez can play.

I don't see this as a huge loss. We've got two of the best wingers already and a couple of world class strikers.
 
We need a couple of world class midfielders to catch up with Barca, not a winger/second striker/whatever position Sanchez can play.

I don't see this as a huge loss. We've got two of the best wingers already and a couple of world class strikers.

I agree.

I was replying to his post that "even a United fan like us would choose Barca over United"
 
I think he wouldn't have become one of the best players in the league had he come here.


I don't think both Modric and Sneijder could close the gap between us and Barca.


We're all obssesed with Barca but its because we dont like being second best and we all wantt Fergie to get another CL before he retires.
 
No but signing for the most complete side in Europe is a soft option.

It's not a soft option. He is signing for a club who play in a league that will probably suit his strengths and they play the best football. He has already said he wishes to play in Spain. He'll earn the same money he'd earn anywhere else bar City or Chelsea. He gets to play with the likes of Messi and Xavi every week. Signing for Barcelona isn't far off being a no brainer.

Signing for Barcelona was obviously the best option for him in his opinion. It does not make it a soft option.
 
It's not a soft option. He is signing for a club who play in a league that will probably suit his strengths and they play the best football. He has already said he wishes to play in Spain. He'll earn the same money he'd earn anywhere else bar City or Chelsea. He gets to play with the likes of Messi and Xavi every week. Signing for Barcelona isn't far off being a no brainer.

Signing for Barcelona was obviously the best option for him in his opinion. It does not make it a soft option.

He'll earn even more.

Barcelona and Real Madrid take over as world's best-paid teams | Football | guardian.co.uk
 
I do agree with the guy a few pages back though. A south American will 90% choose Barca over us right now. It was always likely to be the case really.
 
If Sanchez lives up to the "hype" of being up there with Messi/Ronaldo in a couple of seasons, this Barca team is going to dominate for some time yet.

I can't see it though. I don't think he will get enough playing time next season to start with, especially at this stage of his career when he needs it.
 
i support united but if barca came in for me and i had genuine world class talent, even i would have to think twice not going with blaugrana.

Their pull is THAT strong. I don't begrudge any player for picking them when I as a united fan would think about going with them as well.

:lol:

Or maybe your your pull towards United is not that strong?

What would actually make you want to go to Barca instead of United?

I'm genuinely baffled.
 
Udinese - No Sanchez deal
Barca yet to agree terms for Chile international ace
Udinese have stated no deal has been brokered with Barcelona for Alexis Sanchez amid weekend reports the starlet would be flying in to finalise the transfer.

The 22-year-old forward is currently training with the Chilean national squad ahead of next month's Copa America, but was thought to be ready to leave the camp to rubber-stamp the transfer.

The Catalan giants have reportedly offered €28million (£24.6m) up front along with a €11m (£9.6m) bonus and promising youngster Jonathan Soriano in exchange.

However, Udinese president Giampaolo Pozzo insists Sanchez remains the club's player as Barcelona's offer remains well short of the club's asking price.

"Sanchez is still an Udinese player," he told Sky Sport 24 Italia. "I'm sorry about this 'saga'. We wanted to keep him for another year to help us with the UEFA Champions League qualifiers.

"But unfortunately we're not a big club in Europe, so when top clubs put their eyes on our player you cannot do anything. But the right offer has not yet arrived.

"Barcelona's offer is not yet the right price, and everyone knows it: both Barcelona and other big clubs. Between us and Barcelona we are still far away."
Huzzah!!!! The thread lives on!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.