Heard that Paddy closed the bet. Could that mean anything?
- Status
Yeah that you cannot put a bet on Sanchez moving anywhere from now on.
Nope
We can't do business until the NYSE opens.
Lingard has better stats than both Sanchez and Martial.
Crerand?
Last season.... LAST season...
Actually they've only closed the betting on Utd.
Oh shit it's on!!!
Best odds now are all at Sky:
2/5 United
3/1 City
9/2 Arsenal
2/5 United
3/1 City
9/2 Arsenal
The odds mean nothing.
This.
So? Both players have had a better season than Sanchez. What you're saying doesn't disprove Reece's point.
Who wants to copy and paste the usual explanation as to how betting markets get closed on transfer markets?
The TL; DR version is that a few daft twats lumping on hundred quid is often enough.
The TL; DR version is that a few daft twats lumping on hundred quid is often enough.
Sorry, what does this mean?
Bookies aren’t going to let people take easy money if he’s a cert to go somewhere.
Some clowns on this thread going on about Martial this evening. People getting way to giddy about a potential Sanchez transfer. Martial turned 22 in December and could be the best around in a few years. Football fans in general are getting way more short sighted, this forum isn't an exception either. Lack of patience over younger players is disgusting, it really is. I would love Sanchez to come but ain't the end of the world if he doesn't. Players like Pogba, Lukaku, Rashford and Martial are the future.
This thread is so hot I may not have read every angle, but my take on this is simple, Sanchez is clearly leaving Arsenal, we can match any fee, wage and agent add-ons anyone else can offer, therefore why on earth do people think we need to through Martial/Mhiki into a deal ?
Who cares about Mourinho's mind games, Conti's interest or Pep's love in !
He would give us something we don't have, ffs make it happen.
Who cares about Mourinho's mind games, Conti's interest or Pep's love in !
He would give us something we don't have, ffs make it happen.
If anyone was actually betting on this, I'd advise people to put their money in Sanchez moving to City, especially at 3/1 odds.
Did anyone see what Rio said on BT today ?
Anyone think he has a point ?
Anyone think he has a point ?
True. I'm just saying that stats aren't the be-all-and-end-all to a footballing debate. I'd love Sanchez here and believe he'd be better than both Lingard and (present day) Martial.
A front three of Martial, Lukaku and Sanchez would be fantastic. Narrow, but fantastic. We'd just need to tweak the midfield to accommodate.
It means I’d you put a tenner on him joining Man Utd you’d lose a tenner.
Still don’t think it makes sense. We’ve got players who play in the same position as Sanchez and who’ve been playing well. It’s the right side of attack where we need someone.
Can someone please explain those odds?
It's only for January. I think it's either United now or City in the summer.
Don't even think he's after Martial much.
Martial is ahead of Rashers in the pecking order, where does that leave him?
Can even seeing Martial elevating his game due to the move.
Martial is ahead of Rashers in the pecking order, where does that leave him?
Can even seeing Martial elevating his game due to the move.
Has to be worth putting money on Sanchez to city, seems certain to be leaving Arsenal this month so your either quids in or out of pocket but happy utd have got their man!
It means I’d you put a tenner on him joining Man Utd you’d lose a tenner.
Still don’t think it makes sense. We’ve got players who play in the same position as Sanchez and who’ve been playing well. It’s the right side of attack where we need someone.
7/2 to city.. feck lads I'd stick a wedge in that now. £100/200....
Go on then do it
Jeez, I don't know much about alot, but I know about the betting markets, and on this they will know nothing more than you and I, good mathmatical guess work based on the current information out there, like all the other markets they price up.
If 'The Times' run a story about Chelsea bidding more than us then the prices will change quickly, but we'll all known the info by then aswell.
If 'The Times' run a story about Chelsea bidding more than us then the prices will change quickly, but we'll all known the info by then aswell.
Agree with this.
Don't want to sound condescending but recently some of the stupidest and most clueless posts I've seen came from newbies. Used to be better with the clear parting and distinction between newbies and main forum, now it feels like there is no filter. Quite unfortunate.
The odds. United example: If your bet is correct, you'll take back 2 in case you had put in 5
Goddamit.
How much is that in decimal odds?.
Not a thing.
It's a good way to hedge against disappointment if City signs him. Like betting on our opponents in a big match.
3.5?
What did he say?
- Status