Hed Zitin
New Member
Going into the season without a striker that can hold the ball up is a big change for Jose. Why change around something that's worked so well for years?
I'd rather go for Modeste.
I'd rather go for Modeste.
Going into the season without a striker that can hold the ball up is a big change for Jose. Why change around something that's worked so well for years?
I'd rather go for Modeste.
We wouldn't be, he's very good at holding the ball up, the idea that you have to be over 6 foot to hold the ball up is infuriating
He'd be a good signing, but getting him would make signing Perisic pretty pointless, so it'll be one or the other I reckon. He's decent in the air, but it isn't his main strength, so having a winger constantly pumping balls into the box wouldn't be the best use of his abilities. We'd be better off with a wide forward (Martial, etc) that he could link up with instead. Seeing as the Perisic rumours seem much more solid, I doubt we'll be in for Lacazette. Someone who's a major aerial threat seems more likely.
What? Out of his 35 goals this season, 2 were headers. Did I not make it clear enough, in literally the 2nd sentence, that I acknowledge that he's decent in the air? My point was that being an aerial threat isn't his main strength and it clearly isn't, so I'm not too sure what you're talking about.But he's a great header of the ball. It would be like seeing Kevin Phillips in the box and not crossing it. He'd probably rip the wingers head off.
Stop typecasting.
I'd much rather have him than Lukaku. His link up play is very good, great pace, great finisher... and he can play defense when needed.
He's also a good player for Rashford to learn from.
I just watched both legs of the Roma vs Lyon Europa league competitions.
Lacazette can't be our only up front signing... but he'd be a good addition for 55 million.
Off to Arsenal it seems. No idea why we aren't in for him at the price quoted. Whether he fits our 'system' or not, he's a better forward than anyone we have currently.
I'm confident we will announce Morate in the next 72 hoursOff to Arsenal it seems. No idea why we aren't in for him at the price quoted. Whether he fits our 'system' or not, he's a better forward than anyone we have currently.
Yes, I assumed that was the case. I was really wondering why that is when he is cheaper and still better than anyone we have.I'd imagine it's because we're looking to sign Morata, and Jose has indicated he doesn't want Lacazette?
either would have been excellent, but if we end with neither, I will be pissed off.I'd imagine it's because we're looking to sign Morata, and Jose has indicated he doesn't want Lacazette?
Lacazette is no big loss. Last season he got 28 goals in Ligue 1, Cavani got 35 and I don't rate Cavani! So Lacazette going to Arsenal doesn't strike any great fear in me. 45M seems reasonable enough in this window though and he's good enough for them.Off to Arsenal it seems. No idea why we aren't in for him at the price quoted. Whether he fits our 'system' or not, he's a better forward than anyone we have currently.
Lacazette is no big loss. Last season he got 28 goals in Ligue 1, Cavani got 35 and I don't rate Cavani! So Lacazette going to Arsenal doesn't strike any great fear in me. 45M seems reasonable enough in this window though and he's good enough for them.
Lacazette is no big loss. Last season he got 28 goals in Ligue 1, Cavani got 35 and I don't rate Cavani! So Lacazette going to Arsenal doesn't strike any great fear in me. 45M seems reasonable enough in this window though and he's good enough for them.
10 of the 28 goals weren't penalties. It's out of 37 goals. Get your facts straight.10 of those were penalties as well
I actually don't think it is a great goal scoring record. 7 were in the Europa League. As much as I enjoyed winning it, I can't say the quality was great. He got 2 against a poor AZ Alkmaar in a 4-1 game (it was 11-2 on aggregate!) and he got 2 against Ajax, who I thought looked pretty bad against us. I'm afraid I don't rate goals scored in France too highly.He actually got 37 goals in 45 fixtures last year which is a great scoring record. More importantly, he's averaged 30 goals a year for the past 3 years. Arsenal have got a very good player. They still need to add a bit more in the attacking department, perhaps in the way of Mahrez, as well as retain Alexis if they want to threaten for the league next year.
10 of those were penalties as well
Ligue 1 is generally a low scoring league.I actually don't think it is a great goal scoring record. 7 were in the Europa League. As much as I enjoyed winning it, I can't say the quality was great. He got 2 against a poor AZ Alkmaar in a 4-1 game (it was 11-2 on aggregate!) and he got 2 against Ajax, who I thought looked pretty bad against us. I'm afraid I don't rate goals scored in France too highly.
So 18 goals in open play? I'm not so sure that's a great record in Ligue 1! Be interesting to see how that translates to the Premier League. Clearly Cavani was the dominant scorer in France last season, and I don't think too many of us would be that keen on signing him.
I actually don't think it is a great goal scoring record. 7 were in the Europa League. As much as I enjoyed winning it, I can't say the quality was great. He got 2 against a poor AZ Alkmaar in a 4-1 game (it was 11-2 on aggregate!) and he got 2 against Ajax, who I thought looked pretty bad against us. I'm afraid I don't rate goals scored in France too highly.
So 18 goals in open play? I'm not so sure that's a great record in Ligue 1! Be interesting to see how that translates to the Premier League. Clearly Cavani was the dominant scorer in France last season, and I don't think too many of us would be that keen on signing him.
10 of the 28 goals weren't penalties. It's out of 37 goals. Get your facts straight.
Penalties in Ligue 1:10 of the 28 goals weren't penalties. It's out of 37 goals. Get your facts straight.
I fully believe it does matter. Or maybe Arsenal should have gone for Pero Pejic - he got 28 league goals for Kukesi last season and would have been a lot cheaper. 28 goals is 28 goals right? Same league goals as Lacazette, so exact same level eh? That's how it works?Doesn't matter where the goals came whether in the league or Europe, they still count the same. He's demonstrated consistency by way of averaging 30 goals a year for the past three years, so it's clear he's not some one season wonder. He'll get at least 25 or more for Arsenal next year which if they lose Alexis will be vital in making up for his production.
I fully believe it does matter. Or maybe Arsenal should have gone for Pero Pejic - he got 28 league goals for Kukesi last season and would have been a lot cheaper. 28 goals is 28 goals right? Same league goals as Lacazette, so exact same level eh? That's how it works?
You say he will "get at least 25 (goals) or more for Arsenal next year (season)" with such certainty. Well, it looks like he's signing, so we shall see...
I know what you're saying, but I'm not so sure goals in France translate well to the Premier League. In fact if we're talking big European leagues I would have France a tier below England, Spain and Germany. I do believe he's better than what they have though so, not a bad signing for them. We've got Champions League next season though and title aspirations, so I believe we need better than Lacazette. I also believe Morata is a better player than Lacazette. But time will tell!We're talking within the framework of big European leagues - as in England, Spain, Italy, Germany, and France.
I would've been very happy if we bought Lacazette and am confident he will be a massive player for Arsenal. Although he alone won't be the difference maker. They still have to buy more attackers to offset the possibility of losing Giroud and Alexis. Lacazette, much like Morata, is just entering his prime career years so they are buying him at just the right time.
I know what you're saying, but I'm not so sure goals in France translate well to the Premier League. In fact if we're talking big European leagues I would have France a tier below England, Spain and Germany. I do believe he's better than what they have though so, not a bad signing for them. We've got Champions League next season though and title aspirations, so I believe we need better than Lacazette. I also believe Morata is a better player than Lacazette. But time will tell!
I fully believe it does matter. Or maybe Arsenal should have gone for Pero Pejic - he got 28 league goals for Kukesi last season and would have been a lot cheaper. 28 goals is 28 goals right? Same league goals as Lacazette, so exact same level eh? That's how it works?
You say he will "get at least 25 (goals) or more for Arsenal next year (season)" with such certainty. Well, it looks like he's signing, so we shall see...
Football is a simple game, but in any case your way of looking at it isn't complex either! If his performance in France is not one of the things you would look at I don't know what you would. On what other basis would you sign him? The post you quoted was in response to someone saying with apparent certainty that he will get 25 goals or more for Arsenal next season. I'm saying that just beside he's scored in France doesn't guarantee him goals in England, I don't see why you've got an issue with that. Quite simply, we don't know, there are no guarantees. And I do maintain French football is a level below the English game. It really is that simple...let's not complicate the beautiful game eh?Extremely simple well of looking at things. France is actually quite a defensive league the only couple of strikers that have ridiculous goalscoring records over the last few years in that league are Cavani and Ibra - both playing for the best team in PSG. Arsenal create a lot of chances and based on what he's done in the French league it's fair to predict that he will score quite a few goals. Of course like all signings from other league that have never played in the Premier League it 's a risk. There are other things you can look at to suggest whilst Lacazette might not do it in the Premiership but his goalscoring record based on what he did in France isn't one.
Lacazette suits EPL football down to the ground. Wenger football even more. Its nothing but a good signing for Arsenal. They are getting a good, consistent goal scorer with potential to be a great one, if Wenger can improve him further.
We won't. He wouldn't suit us under our current boss. No way he's suit us better than Moratta. That's wishful thinking.I think we are going to regret not buying this guy. In my opinion he will get more goals than Morata, will cost less and will work better with the way we play.
..........
France aren't really a big league, they're definitely not, can't be grouped with the top 4, they have strong teams at the top of the scale with Monaco and PSG but the overall league quality is so dire it makes me sad, i hate to disagree with you because well, it's you.We're talking within the framework of big European leagues - as in England, Spain, Italy, Germany, and France.
I would've been very happy if we bought Lacazette and am confident he will be a massive player for Arsenal. Although he alone won't be the difference maker. They still have to buy more attackers to offset the possibility of losing Giroud and Alexis. Lacazette, much like Morata, is just entering his prime career years so they are buying him at just the right time.