FriedClams
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2021
- Messages
- 4,041
You do realise the one you’ve linked by me was a joke right
yes, just stood out as quite funny to me
You do realise the one you’ve linked by me was a joke right
I'm confused...
Im still not sure why my quote of my preference to keep Ronaldo over Figo has any relevance here, in 2005 Ronaldo was doing quite well if i recall... but thanks for clarifying.a poster implied that fans were saying similar things about Ronaldo back in 2003 as we were about garnacho yesterday
Im still not sure why my quote of my preference to keep Ronaldo over Figo has any relevance here, in 2005 Ronaldo was doing quite well if i recall... but thanks for clarifying.
Garnacho might be ok enough on the right, but I think if you put Antony on the left wing he’d probably keep running straight off the pitch as he’s incapable of turning the other way. Kinda like Zoolander.I think it was a night where the fullback had his number on the whole. I wonder why they didn’t consider swapping wings or something
Because he has to learn how to get the better of the defender in these situations, moving him out of that situation won't do anything positive for his development.I think it was a night where the fullback had his number on the whole. I wonder why they didn’t consider swapping wings or something
Yes he has to learn but we also have to win. Hence he was subbed.Because he has to learn how to get the better of the defender in these situations, moving him out of that situation won't do anything positive for his development.
This - I don't think his decision making was particularly wrong - it's just a night in which he struggled to do even the things that come naturally to him.It wasn't his decision making that let him down the most. It was his technical ability. He was the most dispossessed player on the pitch today with only Rashford rivalling him in unsuccessful touches. Even his passing wasn't great. Look at Shaw's yellow card. That was a direct result of a wayward pass from Garnacho. It was a straight abysmal performance.
Is it possible this place was a lot more positive then than it is now after the dark ages the club has endured?it was just to highlight some of the things people were saying. Reading more posts from back then, people were way more convinced about Ronaldo than garnacho
I think there's just a huge difference in talent levels. Ronaldo was very technically proficient whereas, I am not so sure that Garnacho is or definitely isn't at the same level. People probably are more critical these days though which is reflective of society as a whole.Is it possible this place was a lot more positive then than it is now after the dark ages the club has endured?
Everyone’s too busy piling in on Antony. They were both very poor, offered very little and poor decision making. Sancho should be taking one of their places.If he's going to start then he's going to have to be held to the same level of scrutiny as everyone else. Two games in a row where he's been shite. Hopefully next game he's back on the bench.
He’s an impact sub it’s time to bench him get Rashford out wide and Martial / Sancho up top . It’s not rocket science