Blasphemy
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
- Messages
- 2,004
For some reason I thought he was from AntwerpFrench is his first language. Since he's from Brussels, he'll probably understand a bit of Dutch as well, though I'm not sure how much.
For some reason I thought he was from AntwerpFrench is his first language. Since he's from Brussels, he'll probably understand a bit of Dutch as well, though I'm not sure how much.
Neither Ronaldo nor Bale slowed down as they filled out. If anything they're quicker. Plus much harder to knock off the ball.
Anyway. Who's the quickest player in our squad right now? Is he skinny or built?
Ronaldo can dribble just like he always could, he just chooses not to. Why take a few seconds performing a dribble when you can just blow past someone with pace, or avoid them entirely with intelligent movement? He's all about efficiency.
I don't want to resort to Youtube, but that's exactly what I'm going to do. If you look at his highlights vids for 2012/13 or 2013/14 there are examples of him weaving through multiple players. Sure he doesn't do it on a game by game basis but he still has it in his arsenal.In his early years Ronaldo would weave his way past people like Iniesta or Messi do, he can't do that anymore for reasons @Brightonian says.
Have you ever watched a rugby player or NFL running back side step a tackle? They're built like fecking tanks and can turn on a sixpence. Absolutely no correlation between having a strong upper body and an inability to quickly change direction. Not unless you get into the realms of ludicrously pumped up body-builders and the like.
Not to resort to Youtube, but that's exactly what I'm going to do. If you look at his highlights vids for 2012/13 or 2013/14 there are examples of him weaving through multiple players. Sure he doesn't do it on a game by game basis but he still has it in his arsenal.
I'm sorry, but it's pretty much an accepted fact that in football a low centre of gravity makes dribbling easier. Rugby is a completely pointless counter-example, because the ball you're trying to move is in your arms, not at your feet. Entirely different range of motions required.
It's not just about being able to quickly change direction whilst keeping your feet. It's about being able to quickly change direction whilst maintaining so much control and range of movement in your feet that you can continue to very delicately manipulate the ball. That is much easier with a low centre of gravity, which is why almost all the best dribblers have always had one.
He can do it occasionally, yes - he's undoubtedly still a great dribbler by most other players' standards. But between 06 and 08 for us he was doing it in pretty much every game, and beating three or four players at a time. His physique would make that more difficult now even if he hadn't moved to a different style of play.
In his early years Ronaldo would weave his way past people like Iniesta or Messi do,
The whole centre of gravity thing makes sense in the context of short vs tall players.
Not in muscular vs skinny players of identical height. First of all, a player that puts on muscle will gain weight on his upper and lower body. Second of all, even if he puts on a bit more muscle on his upper body than he does on his lower body will it really make that much difference to his overall centre of gravity? Finally, the improved core strength and power in the legs will make it easier, rather than harder, to make a rapid change of direction.
You've completely fudged my point about rugby players, by the way. Either this alleged increased height of their centre of gravity makes it harder to change direction quickly or it doesn't. The stuff about being more muscular somehow making it harder to maintain "so much control and range of movement in your feet" doesn't make sense on any level.
If he can do it at all, the fact he does it less frequently than before (allegedly) can only be because he chooses to do it less frequently, not because he is unable to.
Yes, it completely does. I'll try again. When a football player bulks up, he's adding muscle all over his body but given that professional football players already have very well developed legs it will mostly be upper body muscle. That's very obviously true of Ronaldo - compare pictures of him in 06 to pictures of him now - the change is in the much broader chest, generally more muscular upper body. The legs are much the same, because he was already pretty sorted in that department.
In his early years Ronaldo would weave his way past people like Iniesta or Messi do, he can't do that anymore for reasons @Brightonian says.
Playing football doesn't really make your legs muscular in the way squatting or deadlifting does. Playing football makes your legs great for endurance but it won't make them ultra strong. Roberto Carlos didn't get those thighs by taking free kicks that's for sure.
Where did I say that playing football builds up your legs? I said that most pro footballers have very built up legs, because having very well developed legs gives you a massive advantage in terms of being good at football. Obviously they get them by doing a lot of gym work.
I think you can actually get faster by bulking up. It just depends on your training and your goals.
After yesterday's game you would have thought that the pace discussion is done now
I don't think scoring goals will improve your pace, it only slowed down the likes of van Persie and Rooney.
White text
Come on Amar you can do better than this
Yes, it completely does. I'll try again. When a football player bulks up, he's adding muscle all over his body but given that professional football players already have very well developed legs it will mostly be upper body muscle. That's very obviously true of Ronaldo - compare pictures of him in 06 to pictures of him now - the change is in the much broader chest, generally more muscular upper body. The legs are much the same, because he was already pretty sorted in that department.
Adding a lot of upper body muscle like that does significantly change centre of gravity. The difference between a low and high centre of gravity, remember, is a very slight one. A significant bulking up will very much change it.
Thirdly: the reason the rugby example isn't relevant is because being the sort of dribbler who can weave through three or four players the way he used to is not just about speed and agility. Yes, top-heavy rugby players can have excellent speed and agility, can turn on a sixpence etc etc. But we're talking about moving with the ball here, not just running. I don't want to get too technical, but the science behind it is essentially the level principle. When a player runs with the ball, their centre of gravity is their effective fulcrum. If they have a low centre of gravity, the distance between their feet, trying to manipulate the ball, and their centre of gravity is small. This allows a greater amount of control over those movements per unit of muscular strength. The higher their centre of gravity, the harder it is to exercise fine control over the ball. It's actually easier to kick the ball hard - that's why when you shoot at goal you do it with a straight leg - but harder to produce delicate movements.
An extreme but illustrative example would be this: holding your arm out straight, moving neither your wrist nor your elbow, try and write something neatly. It's obviously much harder than doing so using your wrist as the fulcrum for the movement. The movement in the tip of the pen/pencil is the equivalent of the movement required of a footballer's feet.
Is anywhere already discussing the fact that Meyler won't face any punishment for his stamp?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...Premier-League-defeat-against-Man-United.html
Thank you as always!
I have literally been waiting for the video since the game ended. Thanks
Great video mate. Januzaj was head and shoulders above the rest, what a talent.
For whose interested in his match compilation I was bored today and decided to do a compilation for the first time.
Edit : Didn't see that the master made one as well.
Awesome videos, mate. You deserve a cheeky tag line.
Yep that pass, Fellaini didnt need to break his stride at all, it was just a brilliant pass and yes it deserved a finish from that pass. No complaints as im happy a more long term player scored :PYou talking about the build up for the second goal? I loved his little pass with the outside of his boot, it was absolutely perfect, right into the path of the crazy haired buffoon. It was criminal Fellaini didn't finish that chance as the run + pass deserved an assist. Still, I was glad Wilson got a brace, so there's that.
"I watch him a lot and try to do the same things that he does," he explained. "He is a very good player. I always look at him and watch his games as well and try to do what he is doing and remember what he did at Manchester United.
"I have to work hard in the gym like he did because, when he came here, he wasn't strong. But after a year or so he became really strong and could push people away. I'm getting a bit stronger now due to the gym work."
On Ronaldo: