Robbie Boy
Full Member
Reagan Poole
He's on international duty.
Bissaka was sent back from loan at one point hence you can't use this argument.
I can see us negotiating his price for another month then scrapping it and deciding to give "Youngy" another season as a main starter.
I can see us negotiating his price for another month then scrapping it and deciding to give "Youngy" another season as a main starter.
I can see us negotiating his price for another month then scrapping it and deciding to give "Youngy" another season as a main starter.
I don't know why a club our size squabbles over this kind of money, especially for a young player that we may have for a decade. If we're willing to pay the extra £15m in add ons just pay it now and crack on with the next deal.
Get the feeling Ed can't win. Overpay people call him a joke, haggle people call him a joke.
We already are getting milked dry every time, and already overpay for every transfer we do, bar James.We won't be our size for very long by just paying whatever we're told to. If you set that precedent we'll get milked dry every time, and the same people complaining about wrapping deals up quickly will say we overpaid.
We won't be our size for very long by just paying whatever we're told to. If you set that precedent we'll get milked dry every time, and the same people complaining about wrapping deals up quickly will say we overpaid.
But why does it take him a week to come up with a new offer? We have been discussing this signing for weeks now, first it was preparing a bid, then first bid, now 2nd bid.... all within 4 weeks or soGet the feeling Ed can't win. Overpay people call him a joke, haggle people call him a joke.
Get the feeling Ed can't win. Overpay people call him a joke, haggle people call him a joke.
I'm not sure I'd consider an extra 10 million (25% increase) as "insulting"...People realise we have books to balance as well right?True story however offering 35 + 5 and it being rejected only to return with 35 + 15 is slightly insulting (if true). Palace clearly want more up front not hypothetical money should we ever get out of our slump (which you can see why they'd be sceptical)
Get the feeling Ed can't win. Overpay people call him a joke, haggle people call him a joke.
We won't be our size for very long by just paying whatever we're told to. If you set that precedent we'll get milked dry every time, and the same people complaining about wrapping deals up quickly will say we overpaid.
But why does it take him a week to come up with a new offer? We have been discussing this signing for weeks now, first it was preparing a bid, then first bid, now 2nd bid.... all within 4 weeks or so
I don't know why a club our size squabbles over this kind of money, especially for a young player that we may have for a decade. If we're willing to pay the extra £15m in add ons just pay it now and crack on with the next deal.
Because the add ons protect us if he flops.
Surely that's obvious? If we had taken that approach to Martial we would have paid £470m or whatever it was the papers said he cost us up front rather than just £35m + add ons for milestones he never achieved.
Is it maybe our lack of experience with this sort of thing that makes it seem like a pointless gap, when in actual fact there are things going on that we're unaware of?
I get really dubious about critisicing things like this because I've never been involved in the process. There's a good chance my ignorance makes it seem like someone is incompetent.
I know from personal experience how lengthy minor processes can be to get put through at work. Someone puts a proposal for something fairly basic forward but it gets rejected for may number of reasons. They don't just quickly scribble out any amendments and return the same day. The changes to the proposal take time, you usually have to re-evaluate the risks and financial implications, get sign off from other places yet again because the new proposal will be different etc. It can take a while.
I don't imagine Ed is sat there, picks up the phone, speaks to Palace, makes an offer, puts the phone down once its rejected, then has a think and calls back half hour later and bangs another 10 million on. I assume there is some form of process for an offer being drafted baring in mind things like agent, commercial and marketing implications etc. All of this potentially needs reviewing, amending in places etc, particularly if you're dealing with conditional add ons. Once the original offer is rejected, it probabaly needs reconsidering and going back through legal, finance, whoever to be re-drafted, signed off on any increases or changes and then proposed again.
I've seen fans saying things like this for years, from all different clubs and I'd lean towards our ignorance than so many clubs and ceos simply being useless. I could be totally wrong, if anyone has a decent level of experience in anything even remotely close to this type of negotiation, I'd be interested to hear their thoughts. People talk about this sort of thing like it's Fifa style negotiating and Monopoly money is used.
I get that if we’re a small club but quibbling over £15m for a young player that we could have for a decade seems daft in my opinion especially when Young is the other option.
True story however offering 35 + 5 and it being rejected only to return with 35 + 15 is slightly insulting (if true). Palace clearly want more up front not hypothetical money should we ever get out of our slump (which you can see why they'd be sceptical)
Is Woodward trying to figure out all the different ways he can add numbers to get to 50?
First off, we don't know if it takes a week. Second, I know clubs make cash-flow assessments before making a bid. For an organisation that rakes in ~€700m annually, it's not an easy task. Third, making bid after bid is a bad negotiating tactic, it shows you are desperate.But why does it take him a week to come up with a new offer? We have been discussing this signing for weeks now, first it was preparing a bid, then first bid, now 2nd bid.... all within 4 weeks or so
Is it maybe our lack of experience with this sort of thing that makes it seem like a pointless gap, when in actual fact there are things going on that we're unaware of?
I get really dubious about critisicing things like this because I've never been involved in the process. There's a good chance my ignorance makes it seem like someone is incompetent.
I know from personal experience how lengthy minor processes can be to get put through at work. Someone puts a proposal for something fairly basic forward but it gets rejected for may number of reasons. They don't just quickly scribble out any amendments and return the same day. The changes to the proposal take time, you usually have to re-evaluate the risks and financial implications, get sign off from other places yet again because the new proposal will be different etc. It can take a while.
I don't imagine Ed is sat there, picks up the phone, speaks to Palace, makes an offer, puts the phone down once its rejected, then has a think and calls back half hour later and bangs another 10 million on. I assume there is some form of process for an offer being drafted baring in mind things like agent, commercial and marketing implications etc. All of this potentially needs reviewing, amending in places etc, particularly if you're dealing with conditional add ons. Once the original offer is rejected, it probabaly needs reconsidering and going back through legal, finance, whoever to be re-drafted, signed off on any increases or changes and then proposed again.
I've seen fans saying things like this for years, from all different clubs and I'd lean towards our ignorance than so many clubs and ceos simply being useless. I could be totally wrong, if anyone has a decent level of experience in anything even remotely close to this type of negotiation, I'd be interested to hear their thoughts. People talk about this sort of thing like it's Fifa style negotiating and Monopoly money is used.
Yeah, it's only £15mil...I don't know why a club our size squabbles over this kind of money, especially for a young player that we may have for a decade. If we're willing to pay the extra £15m in add ons just pay it now and crack on with the next deal.
If that's the case then why do clubs like Real finish transfers without fuss?
I think it shows that we’re very aware of the fact he’s had one good season thus far. We’re fine with the 50m part, it’s a reasonable price to pay in this market, we just want a bit of insurance in case he turns out to be a dud.I don't know why a club our size squabbles over this kind of money, especially for a young player that we may have for a decade. If we're willing to pay the extra £15m in add ons just pay it now and crack on with the next deal.
I'm not sure I'd consider an extra 10 million (25% increase) as "insulting"...People realise we have books to balance as well right?
Real Madrid have for the longest time been in the most ideal negotiating position. "Smaller" clubs bizarrely tend to bend over backwards for them because they are the only side their player wants to join and they don't want to stand in the way of a player's dream. Club's ask for a fair price and Real pay up.
Ajax are going to sell a few players this summer with very little negotiation also, they respect their players and ask for fair prices when they could do a Crystal Palace and demand 100m+ for MDL.
United's biggest issue is dealing with English clubs, they are all too rich and too stubborn.