- Joined
- Jun 1, 2008
- Messages
- 16,565
Heaven forbid we sign a 21 year old English defender who is rock-solid defensively. Especially after seeing Young and Dalot defend the last couple of months.
This is so overstated its getting ridiculous.
Meunier would be a sensible signing.
I would like to see Dalot and a new LB as first choice, sell Shaw.
Then we would have 3 full backs for 2 positions, Dalot, Meunier and new LB. And if there were injuries, I think Matic could play at LB, Lindelof at RB etc.
Meunier would be a sensible signing.
I would like to see Dalot and a new LB as first choice, sell Shaw.
Then we would have 3 full backs for 2 positions, Dalot, Meunier and new LB. And if there were injuries, I think Matic could play at LB, Lindelof at RB etc.
Shaw was only player of the year because the rest of the team and defence were awful. Shaw is a good player but we need an upgrade on him, he was poor in possession and his final ball was also poor.
Shaw was only player of the year because the rest of the team and defence were awful. Shaw is a good player but we need an upgrade on him, he was poor in possession and his final ball was also poor.
Ask any Palace fan and they will tell you: comfortable with the ball is about the last thing you would say about AWB.
It's not said enough frankly.
We've had two awful footballers at RB and RCB for half a decade or more now (not that the left sided defenders have been much better). Isn't it time we followed the examples of modern day successes and got defenders who are actually comfortable with the ball at their feet?
Ask any Palace fan and they will tell you: comfortable with the ball is about the last thing you would say about AWB.
What a bunch of BS
Shaw really isn't poor in possession.Shaw was only player of the year because the rest of the team and defence were awful. Shaw is a good player but we need an upgrade on him, he was poor in possession and his final ball was also poor.
Shaw really isn't poor in possession.
So poor crossing doesnt count as poor in possession? My bad, he has no end product so by default can still be classed as poor in possession, maybe should have labelled it as poor end product. Im not suggesting we need to replace him now, we are need of replacements in other areas first of all.
Hello. He is comfortable on the ball.
Not so great when he has to beat the opposing fullback and whip in a cross but he dribbles well and keeps things simple for us, usually giving it back to Zaha or Townsend. To be fair he is told to do that, our width comes down the left with PVA pushing up (because he can’t defend to save his life, so Roy doesn’t have a choice).
I hope you sign Meunier.
Ask any Palace fan and they will tell you: comfortable with the ball is about the last thing you would say about AWB.
brilliant.Hello. He is comfortable on the ball.
Im not comparing him to AWB at all, just that his final ball isnt whats needed. I consider poor in possession to include his decision making when he gets to the business end of the pitch, not necessarily giving the ball away, but his thought process behind his choices is somewhat limited.
He has 4 league assists to AWB 3 so not that much better, but wasnt comparing the 2 of them as they are not the same position, was just giving an opinion on Shaw.
Not sure AWB is what we need, but would be an improvement on Young.
Shaw was only player of the year because the rest of the team and defence were awful. Shaw is a good player but we need an upgrade on him, he was poor in possession and his final ball was also poor.
Poor in possession is not the same as poor with possession. 2 different concepts entirely. His passing may be good but his decision making is not, all I was trying to say
I'm not arguing with anyone just putting an opinion out there. Hope this helps
Good post, agree with your sentiment.The fee has no relativity to if AWB is a success or not. Facts are facts, he's been one of the best defenders (let alone fullbacks) in the league this season. This consequently makes him one of the best in europe additionally.
We have an overaged abysmal fullback who is leading the position in Ashley Young, his back up (Dalot) is a young prodigy who has looked utterly clueless in the fullback role but promising further up the pitch.
Why is AWB going to cost within the range of 50-70 million ? He's young / proven / contractually tied. All this nonsense that everyone is spouting about his attacking play, he will be coached here, be playing under a different system and with a higher quality of players these are conditions that can provide a foundation of improvement (Robertson). You also have to consider that Van Aanholt is consistent in stretching runs into the opposition's box so tactically Roy could be telling AWB to hold his position with more discipline.
Whenever in recent history has a fullback been relied heavily upon to facilitate possession the way a midfielder does (which constitutes possession play). Luke Shaw has received untold criticism for resembling the habits of a central midfielder in a wider role. Fullbacks have a very small margin to operate in, they cannot influence the play as integrally as a midfielder or striker dropping off (Trent AA is the only exception considering he's so gifted technically, clearly this is a tactical ploy of klopps something not every team has the luxury of). The concensus from fans is all our emphasis of attack will go through the fullback, this is utter nonsense it's the midfield who dictate the tempo, fullbacks can overlap an intervened winger essentially to cross or shoot nothing more.
Look at who we have down the right side: Mata / Lingard. Neither of these two are disciplined to stay wide, neither of them contribute effectively defensively and both are relatively slow out of possession. If you take all that into account and then put an attacking fullback behind these two, your left with a hole that simply put cannot be satisfied.
All this nonsense that everyone is spouting about his attacking play, he will be coached here, be playing under a different system and with a higher quality of players these are conditions that can provide a foundation of improvement (Robertson).
With Tuanzebe coming back as well.My preferred option at RB, him along with De Ligt and we’d have a solid defence.
Wtf is "poor hips" thing? I have read it earlier as well on here. Was it you who posted that nonsense as well?Dalot is not a RB or a RW. He would be ok as wing back, but only when we play that formation. Frankly I can't believer others don't see his deficiencies. Experience won't change the poor hips and athletic shortcomings as a fullback and he can't run at players well enough to play an attacking position.
It's not said enough frankly.
We've had two awful footballers at RB and RCB for half a decade or more now (not that the left sided defenders have been much better). Isn't it time we followed the examples of modern day successes and got defenders who are actually comfortable with the ball at their feet?
Ask any Palace fan and they will tell you: comfortable with the ball is about the last thing you would say about AWB.
He's on some clueless crusade. One of the few who overstate AWB's lack of attacking ability. It's as if young players moving to a club with better players and a new system wont improveWow, you really didn't see AWB this season didn't you?
The guy has 1.7 successful dribble per match, second only to Zaha in all of Crystal palace squad.
https://www.whoscored.com/Teams/162/Show/England-Crystal-Palace
Cant see yourselves or Arsenal bidding 50m. Why would Liverpool? Doubt City will with Walker - but possible. Chelsea are a possibility but look to be transfer banned.He is very talented and if clubs get a sniff he is available then I'd imagine everybody in the top 6 going in for him.
He is very talented and if clubs get a sniff he is available then I'd imagine everybody in the top 6 going in for him.
Liverpool don't need him. They are out.
City possibly but Walker still got years in him yet. Doubt City will be in for him.
Spurs could do with a RB but they won't spend £60m on a right back. No chance.
Arsenal? Forget it.
Chelsea don't need him. They have Azpi.
There's only United really who both need a player in his position and would sanction the move due to his price tag. If he's allowed to leave it will be to join us.
For a Guardiola team he won't be better than Walker IMO.I could see City going for him. He might oust Walker from the first XI.
I could see City going for him. He might oust Walker from the first XI.