Haven't bothered to read up the cafalysis after their loss, but I take it the 'bottler' tag is out and people are convinced that Poch isn't the fella for us, eh?
Higher level?
Shouldnt someone on a higher level be beating Ole and United and Wolves at home and getting 3 points at Watford?
That's why they arent level on points with Liverpool now
Serious bottler. Argentine Moyes..if we only want to develop youth and compete for top 4 with limited budget ,then he is the man , but if we wants trophies , at least Ole knows how it feels to lift a trophy.
Yep higher level imo. One swallow doesn't make a summer. Not a criticism of Ole and there's a emotionally response in wanting him to do well, which he's clearly doing but this job is too big for him to do in long term. How Poch has achieved even getting Spurs competing year in year out without spending any meaningful money makes him the best manager in the league again imo. My only reservation is some managers function in adversity and I'm unsure if Poch got 500m, could he function better or worse.....
They have bottled a title to Leicester. Bottles countless other chances to win a trophy. Bottled CL games. They even bottled it this season the moment they were in contention for the title they lost. This mentality comes from the manager. He has a world class team. The game against Chelsea is irrelevant to Poch being a bottler as he has proved that throughout his career. And mentioning depleted squads, is it not Pochs fault for running players into the ground during the Christmas period? Maybe he should use subs more often.This "bottler" narrative becomes ridiculous when you ignore all other more pertinent factors in a loss just to twist it into being what you want it to be.
Spurs currently have a heavily depleted squad that even when in full health is relatively weak. That was the prime issue today and is far more relevant to the result than the convenient pre-existing line of attack on Pochettino. Remove Salah, Mane and one of the midfielders from Liverpool's stronger squad and see how they get on. Or Pogba, Rashford and Martial from ours, which is also a stronger squad.
Just because you think something about a side that doesn't mean that everything that happens to them has to back up your argument.
He's been shafted from the Spurs board. Basically tied his hands and said "this is it" with one of Spurs best squads in their history. They had to keep improving and get new blood and quality in but for the board they just wanted to get the stadium finished as soon as they could and believe Poch could continue miracles at the club.
Give that man the United job with resources and he'd turn us into a Premier League challenging side and a team challenging for the Champions League too.
"We have three more competitions, still. We arrived in a semifinal and lost to Chelsea, one of the best teams in Europe. I can only feel proud of the performance and the way we competed."
Being "proud" of a team that loses a semifinal -- another semifinal -- is not the language of a manager who wins the biggest trophies.
Yes and no. A coach with a winner's DNA wouldn't have signed an extension, or would have negotiated harder with the board for reinforcements. I hate Mourinho, but there's no way he would have not forced concessions from the board - or he would have stropped and gotten fired
Winner's DNA. Do you guys even here yourselves?
It is always funny to read excuses for the failures of Caf's favourite son.
People talking about the missing players forget that Spurs entered today with an advantage of 1-0 win from first leg. They just needed to hold on and get at least a draw to pass. Their absent players were all in the attack it's not like they entered this match needing to win. They just needed to hold on.
Reminds me of how he treated the CL a few years ago.I find it strange that Pochettino treats the chance of winning trophies so lightly. Had Spurs won lots in recent years that would be one thing. They haven't though. So why is your reserve keeper starting?
In fairness Spurs should be in the final. The no away goals rule is BS. Still if you go into a game needing a 0-0 to progress and don't do it questions should be asked.
Fear of success. You can't lose if you don't play.I find it strange that Pochettino treats the chance of winning trophies so lightly. Had Spurs won lots in recent years that would be one thing. They haven't though. So why is your reserve keeper starting?
I agree but we should be looking at his flaws too though, especially if he is considered for the United job. If he do come here, lets hope it is Spurs mentality we're seeing and not his own. It will never be accepted at United.FFS. He’s clearly a class manager. At some point there’s just not much more you can do. He needs heavy backing in the transfer market.
Serious question, you swap Pochettino out of Tottenham and swap in Silva from Everton, Santo from Wolves or Howe from Bournemouth, would anyone even notice?
He was unlucky last night with injuries and penalties in the end but an elite coach would have found a way to win. The way Spurs folded under the Chelsea pressure in the first half was piss poor.
It's hard to judge him on that game alone but 1 final in 5 seasons is a bit shit for someone who has ambitions to manage a huge club.
I find it strange that Pochettino treats the chance of winning trophies so lightly. Had Spurs won lots in recent years that would be one thing. They haven't though. So why is your reserve keeper starting?
In fairness Spurs should be in the final. The no away goals rule is BS. Still if you go into a game needing a 0-0 to progress and don't do it questions should be asked.
Reminds me of how he treated the CL a few years ago.
Fear of success. You can't lose if you don't play.
Would you rather him or Klopp (without the biased Liverpool connections)? Just strictly as a manager.
He's done nothing. If Everton discover another Wayne Rooney in their ranks and Marco Silva gets them into the top 4 everyone will be salivating over him as well. The clamour for a man who has done well under low expectations is astounding in this place. They absolutely bottle everything that involves and expectation to win. That is a very bad trait for a manager of Manchester UnitedI believe he will prove his doubters wrong at his next club. Hopefully it's us.
It's Klopp all day long. The guy has won trophies and consistently challenged with underdogs.Would you rather him or Klopp (without the biased Liverpool connections)? Just strictly as a manager.
Doesn't this go against the narrative that he develops youth players? Remember when people said that about Moyes before we signed him? Remember all those quality youth players Moyes bedded into our first team?FFS. He’s clearly a class manager. At some point there’s just not much more you can do. He needs heavy backing in the transfer market.
Don't really understand your point as Marco Silva has not discovered another Wayne Rooney and is nowhere near top four so this is all conjecture.He's done nothing. If Everton discover another Wayne Rooney in their ranks and Marco Silva gets them into the top 4 everyone will be salivating over him as well. The clamour for a man who has done well under low expectations is astounding in this place. They absolutely bottle everything that involves and expectation to win. That is a very bad trait for a manager of Manchester United