Thuram is so much better than Carr that you have to take him. Especially when you haven't got much natural width down the right.
Yes I think you are right - so my first pick is Thuram. Over to Snow ...
Thuram is so much better than Carr that you have to take him. Especially when you haven't got much natural width down the right.
I've followed Verón since his early pre-European days and after. He is quite capable of pressing in a disciplined way, not a great imposing tackle on him which is surprising for a guy his size., but all in all usually is at his best when devoid of those duties. He is the that needs time and space when on the ball, if you are pressing all the time then when your team recovers the ball you are bound to have the former pressee becoming a pressor (made up words, you get the idea). That is, he is not as effective a playmaker when required to chip in with pressing, but can do it. He definitely has a lot more workrate on him than Riquelme (not that it requires much! ).
I do tend to agree with your assessment though: next game you'll probably still play Tacchinardi and the more you progress the more you will want midfielders who make a real contribution. I'm not sure you will ever play him to be honest.
Yes I think you are right - so my first pick is Thuram. Over to Snow ...
Have to disagree - imo players with vision, technique and skill like Veron are the ones that cope best with limitations in time and space. See Scholes, Xavi, Silva etc - their awareness, touch, control and passing creates time and space for themselves and their teams.
Now with Guardiola pinging balls out wide to the best pair of overlapping full-backs in the game, the team looks to have some real shape.
Now with Guardiola pinging balls out wide to the best pair of overlapping full-backs in the game, the team looks to have some real shape.
I'd say Dan's fullbacks are at least as good, if not better.
I'd say Dan's fullbacks are at least as good, if not better.
You cant possibly favour Serginho over Roberto Carlos?!
Cafu vs Thuram is not as clear cut and probably goes down to personal preference
My pick is determined heavily about how people view Lampard in a three man midfield next to Petit. He use to play next to him at first at Chelsea in a two man midfield but that wasn't in his primer. He's of course played there with England as well but not next to a Petit type.
People view Neville as my weak link. Frings did of course play there at times with Germany but it's not his preferred position. I'd trust Neville more with a tricky winger since he's shown he can do it in his old age vs Bale for instance.
Then there's Kuffour. He could play at right back as well if I choose to bring in a defender.
It's Cocu, Nedved or Cannavaro for me. It's just hard to pass up Nedved. With him my front four would be the best in the game I reckon.
I'd definitely consider Kuffour as a right back and honestly in my view Neville's a better defender than Heinze, so if I were you I'd move him to left back.
I have gone for a strong core to the team. Julio Cesar, Lucio, Gilberto Silva, Makelele, Ronaldo - all top players who, in their prime, were amongst the best around.
I have replaced Edu with Makelele in the starting lineup to match the traditional Brazilian tactic of 2 defensive midfielders, to allow the rest of the team to attack when they need to.
The width will be provided by Cafu, arguably the best right back of his generation, and on the other side Serginho. When either of these 2 go forward I have a well disciplined, World Cup winning defensive midfielder in Gilberto and the best defensive midfielder in the draft to cover for them.
Attacking-wise, the creativity of the two Juninhos and Edmundo will be able to create chances, and then I have the best striker of this generation to score the goals for me in Ronaldo.
Thuram would have been my first choice but he got picked. I honestly don't feel I need a midfielder. It's just greed to want Nedved. I'd be like Milan with their striker purchases getting him.
I'm picking Cannavaro. Your turn Rood.
Deco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cocu bro. I'm even willing to let him go to you for a measly fiver.
Completely different player.
Yeah in the sense he can do everything he does and more.
Yours for a fiver Rood la.
Ive decided that I can't turn down the opportunity to get Nedved - was always a huge fans of his and he gives me a 3rd Ballon D'or in my team and Im a proper muppet for these individual honours!
Completely different player.
I can see Rood's dilemma. Baffled by Snow's. Mate, everyone is telling you: you have the best wingers, give them someone to play with in the middle!
There's a reason why Nedved was the 10th pick and Lampard the 48th (and 48th because you picked him, otherwise he may have been hanging around longer).
Everyone? Just you mate. Lampard is a world class player. I'm pretty short on world class in defense. It's been my weakest part in this competition yet here I am.
Forlan on the left?
Not just me, Brwned told you as much. I understand your concern with shoring up your defence and Cannavaro goes a long way in doing that (no way Rood would have gone into the next round with Baggio).
You are here because you have smashing wingers, Kluivert and yes, Lampard arriving late. It's a great setup to try outscore the opposition, but not to control a game. You don't have the central midfielder that makes you tick, not one worthy of those wingers.
You are going to be facing Vieira, Mendieta and Riquelme, you will get blown out of the water with Petit, Frings and Lampard.
Anyway, I'm not here to get you worked up. I've made the same argument before trying to be constructive and you continue rejecting it without much consideration so I may as well leave you alone.
My only lingering doubt is whether to swap Luis Enrique and Seedorf there.
i.e. Luis Enrique playing box-to-box on that left side and onto Scholes or on the right side to help with Pires. My inclination is I could still expect Seedorf to track back and I have Zanetti on that side so the right man on Scholes is much more critical.
Thoughts?