antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
Tottenham got him. He liked their money as well as the oil money
Too late by then though
Tottenham got him. He liked their money as well as the oil money
Sorry still choosing a right back. Several of my picks have gone. This is a load of Arce
If you're picking a right back....can i go ahead and post mine so I can leave? Not a defender so shouldn't hold you up.
It really is slim pickens in the right back department. The reason for me picking one now instead of a center back.
I remember that save at 2.15 well, stunning!
Zen - you've ruined everything
The peak can't be much more than 2-3 seasons. Otherwise players like Guti are better than Aimar.
10th best keeper? Really? Guy who won CL and the WC with years apart as 1st choice. He used to be good you know before he got hit on the head or something that made him forget how to catch a ball in his latter Milan years.
As a goalkeeper over the course of his peak(not just one season), Dida is about 10th best in this for me, maybe even lower, far too erratic throughout his time at Milan and Brazil. If you are going by such a short time span to judge their peak, than you have another even better keeper left also.
I'll take it anyway I get it. Jeg snakker også Dansk. Kan jeg måske også får dit stemme fordi jeg snakker det samme sprog som du gør?
Du er Dansk ikke?
The peak can't be much more than 2-3 seasons. Otherwise players like Guti are better than Aimar.
10th best keeper? Really? Guy who won CL and the WC with years apart as 1st choice. He used to be good you know before he got hit on the head or something that made him forget how to catch a ball in his latter Milan years.
He wasn't first choice in 2002.
He was at Milan
My list has 3-4 goalkeepers I'd rather than Dida. Maybe five. But fair enough, he certainly was a good goalkeeper, to debate otherwise is a bit foolish.
That sounds about right. My reason I chose him above those others are his achievements and personal recognition he's gotten from his peers.
That being said the stand out goalkeepers had already been taken a long time ago and at least 9 goalkeepers will be picked before my last pick. Dida would have been one of them. So would all the goalkeepers of similar quality. Doesn't really matter which one of the I picked.
Dida was nominated for a Ballon d'or after his 02/03 season with Milan. That season he saved 3 penalties that won the game for Milan vs Juventus in the CL final.
The season after that he did really well. And as well after that. .
Goalkeepers is probably the least important in a draft anyway. Don't think I've ever seen a goalkeeper having a vote changing impact.
How do you know this?
Apart from the fact that more votes take place than individual user comments in a match thread, how do you know that subconsciously people don't see it and mark them down?
It makes as much difference as any other position, to me.
Dida was first choice at Milan as soon as he arrived. They bought him for that reason. They bought him after the WC and his first season was the 2002/2003 season.
Well mainly due to the fact that I've never seen anyone write "Oh he has a worse goalkeeper so he won't get my vote.
It's always other positions, hell even when people had the best goalkeepers like Schmeichel no one commented on it. Obviously it's impossible to read minds but I've never seen any comments about goalkeepers. I'm sure if it had any vote winning effect I'm sure we'd have seen a comment by now.
Well mainly due to the fact that I've never seen anyone write "Oh he has a worse goalkeeper so he won't get my vote.
It's always other positions, hell even when people had the best goalkeepers like Schmeichel no one commented on it. Obviously it's impossible to read minds but I've never seen any comments about goalkeepers. I'm sure if it had any vote winning effect I'm sure we'd have seen a comment by now.
I'd have to judge each on their individual merits. I don't know what was in front of Schmeichel in any previous games.
I just don't think its ever ignored. Yes, all keepers have their good days, but I think if two teams are good and one has an outstanding keeper, I'm leaning that way for a clean sheet.
Just my opinion, I can't read minds either.
To be honest, I assessed keepers as relevant in the last retro tourno:
Step 1) "On their day any keeper can play a blinder", so I don't underrate the evidently lesser keeper and move on straight to Step 2.
Step 2) Is either keeper error-prone? In that case I have an ever so slight bias for the other team. If undecided, that may make the whole difference.
Step 3) If I'm completely on the fence on who may win the game I apply the logic that in knockout stages draws are decided by penalties. At that point Dida would be handy.